Han Chinese relationship life

Typical Han Chinese have no real personal life, but all relationship life. (“Typical” means they are well recognized as Han Chinese by other Han Chinese. Personal life, by comparing to relationship life, means the life they can enjoy as the natural one. Relationship life mean Han Chinese can only enjoy their lives in some relationship, while not the lives, which can be separated from others’. For example, if a person can enjoy a personal life, he/she doesn’t have to be in some relationship, but if a person can only enjoy a relationship life, he/she has to be in some relationship. Please distinguish between the relationship of friendship and the relationship between the upper and the lower or other unbalanced relationship.)

It is very important to understand Han Chinese behaviors in society.

If all the members of a society have their real personal life and enjoy their personal life and think the society is a way to live the life they want, they will have a different view on social relationship. And they can act under the conditions of a good society. But if they can only enjoy the unbalanced relationship, there would be different reasons for their behaviors. And the behaviors would make the society not functional enough to benefit the entire group.

But typical Han Chinese don’t have their real personal life, they all have relationship life. It affects Han Chinese views on social relationship and their social behaviors.

It is the fact, which can be experienced or observed. It is also the reason, which can be used to explain some Han Chinese phenomena, such as Han Chinese are irresponsible and lack of real moral values in society, extremely hypocritical, and think they must get to be in higher rank or have somebody in lower rank to have their enjoyable life. It is also one of the reasons why Han Chinese like children and like more generations in a family. And it is also the reason why, despite their number, they are probably the world most loneliness-fear people.

The “inferior” Japanese

Han Chinese think it proves Japanese inferior that almost all of Japanese soldiers fought to death in the Battle of Saipan. And it proves Han Chinese themselves are superior to “the dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters” because Han Chinese knew they should surrender to their enemy to be alive. And it also proves “the great Han Chinese” are much wiser than Japanese that they knew they should comfort their enemy.

“No Chinaman is good!”

How does the world comment on Han Chinese?

Usually, the foreign researchers in universities got good impression on China, because they got very limited experience. They think Chinese are friendly and china is beautiful.

Most of the foreigners from the countries out of Eastern Asia, if they are doing business with Han Chinese, and if they are just getting to know Han Chinese, would comment, “Some of Chinese are very good.”  “I think most of Chinese are good.”   “Chinese are not as bad as what our government warned us at all. They (their government) told lies!”   “China is very good!”(thumb up)   “How can I become a Chinese citizen?”

But, after they got to know Han Chinese more, some of them would say, “Chinese are poorly qualified.”   “They are irresponsible.”   “We got taught lessons. We can’t trust them(Chinese) any more.”  “We have to be very cautious to do business with them(Chinese).”

Those journalists or sociologists would make more negative comments. But instead of criticizing Han Chinese people, they would rather attack the communist regime.

Western tourists would make more negative comments on Chinese people, “They charge us 10 times higher than they charge Chinese.” “The service is so different from what they introduced.”

The people living in the South Eastern Asia or North Eastern Asia would call Han Chinese “Chinaman” or “Chinapig!” because they have known Han Chinese for a long time and know well.

All of the “mature” Han Chinese immigrants (overseas Han Chinese) comment on Han Chinese, “No Chinaman is good.”

All of the “mature” Han Chinese (living in china, Taiwan, or Hong Kong) would say, “Don’t trust them(Han Chinese)! They are the most virulent.” And themselves are also Han Chinese, and get alerted to by other Han Chinese.

The comments by different people are so diverse. But usually, people who know Han Chinese more make more negative comments.

———————-

* The above is based on my personal experience. I didn’t do a social statistics.

** “mature” means knowing or experiencing Han Chinese well enough.

the “pig/dog” and the “dear from the same womb”

Another interesting and contradictory phenomenon is that Han Chinese call other Han Chinese “dog/pig”, or “non native”, or “wanderer”, but also call other Han Chinese and sometimes non-Han-Chinese “dear from-the-same-wombs”.

Why?

It can also be simply explained.

If Han Chinese want to rule you and if you are willing or possibly you are willing to accept their rule, you are their “dear from-the-same-wombs”.

But if you are already under their rule, or if you are not under their rule and you are unwilling to accept their rule, you are the “pig/dog”.

So, you can know when you will be called “pig/dog” and when you will be called “dear from the same womb” by Han Chinese.

Pig/dog and the superior ethnic group

You would find it very interesting and contradictory that Han Chinese themselves call each other “Pig/dog” and at the same time they force everybody to think Han Chinese ethnic group “the superior ethnic group”.

Why?

That phenomenon can be easily explained.

It is because Han Chinese personality is one-sided and their pursuit of being arrogant.

Then, the partial personality and their pursuit make them look down on each other and offensively call each other “pig/dog” to make themselves be the superior and can be arrogant, and the same reasons make them have to force everybody to think Han Chinese ethnic group “superior”, and then they can be arrogant in the world.

So, Han Chinese make themselves “the superior pig ethnic group”.

Won’t Han Chinese kneel again because of those Han Chinese patriots?

Won’t Han Chinese kneel again because of those Han Chinese patriots?

Han Chinese patriots,

• will they fight for the truth to strengthen their country?
• will they fight for the truth to improve the quality of Han Chinese ethnic group?
• will they find the right values?
• will they fight for the right values to develop?
• would they rather die in battle field than surrender before they saw their foreign enemy?
• will they stop fighting against their “dear from-the-same-wombs” (they also call other Han Chinese pigs, or dogs, or stupid pussies)?
• will they fight for their dear pigs, or dear dogs, or dear stupid pussies?
• will their dear stupid pussies like them and fight with them against their foreign enemy?
• will Han Chinese never kneel again because of those Han Chinese patriots?

But, what are Han Chinese patriots really fighting for? They fight for

• their evils
• their flaws
• their psychological illness
• their dishonor
• their lies
• their shame
• their inferiority
• their barbarism
• their arrogance
• their beautified appearance
• their state of normality, which is lower than beasts
• whatever their enemies think wrong

What are Han Chinese patriots fighting against? They fight against

• those who criticize Han Chinese (both outsiders or insiders)
• those who reveal the truth, or the facts (both outsiders or insiders)
• those who hurt Han Chinese arrogance (both outsiders or insiders)
• those who ask Han Chinese for fairness
• whatever their enemies think right

But, by learning their history and their behavior, we can’t expect they would fight against their enemies in battle field as much as they fight against their criticizers.

What are Han Chinese patriots themselves?

• They can never be expected to be normal, or fair, or polite, or civilized (though they rebuke others because they don’t think others civilized as much as themselves), or as brave as themselves when they offend others.
• They are totally low lives, lower than beasts.
• They concern less or nothing about their real interests, but concern being able to be arrogant or not.

Will Han Chinese kneel again because of those patriots?

Manchu Qing Empire and some policies to rule Han Chinese

Manchu conquest and Manchu rule shows that

• Han Chinese can be conquered with violence.
• In entire Han Chinese written history, they had never fought for freedom, but fought for arrogance.  And they can also live under others’ arrogance after they got defeated.
• The ruler can raise a ruling class to support his power, and Han Chinese don’t fight against the ruling class, but dream they can one day become the member of the class.
• The ruler should violently oppress any rebellion and treat rebels cruelly.
• The ruler should give some opportunities to a few ambitious Han Chinese to let them enjoy upper rank and arrogance, and more importantly to fool other Han Chinese.
• The ruler should keep Han Chinese relationship to make them keep Han Chinese traits to restrict them and control them.
• The ruler should at least let Han Chinese live a basic life.
• The ruler should give Han Chinese chances to be arrogant in international relationship or events to make them release their mental pressure and to be proud of themselves. When Han Chinese are proud of themselves, they are proud of their country, and they don’t concern much about who rules them.

Then, the entire Han Chinese group will forget who rules them, and they have no enough motivation to fight against their ruler, and probably they got satisfied and fight for the ruler to fight for their own arrogance, and the rulers don’t have to worry about a Han Chinese revolt.

When you compare Manchu rulers with today’s communism party, would you think they are similar?

The low ranked job of looking for reasons

Traditionally, the job of looking for reasons is low ranked and get despised by Han Chinese, because those “idiots” can’t threaten others violently but offer theory (not facts) to prove something true or false, right or wrong.

So, what job would be higher ranked? The job can make people treat others with force.

——————-

Remark,

Most of Han Chinese reason seekers are theory learners. They don’t look for facts to prove or disprove theory. They are not truth seekers.

One sided right/obligation

One sided right/obligation is one of the critical Han Chinese traits. It interacts with Han Chinese relationship, Han Chinese personality, attitude, behavior, or thinking.

Generally, if we want to answer the question, how do Han Chinese treat others, we can say they treat others one-sidedly. If we want to answer, why do they treat each other one sidedly, we can say it is because their personality, thinking, and pursuit is one sided. If we want to answer, why are Han Chinese such people, we can say it is because they grew up and live in one sided relationship.

So, it is natural for Han Chinese to think right and obligation one-sided.

Han Chinese cannibalism

The word of cannibalism is not completely proper to describe Han Chinese. But it isn’t a wrong word to describe them.

Han Chinese cannibalism,

• The relationship between the old and the young, between the parents and the children

Han Chinese don’t produce offspring to act as a living thing, but treat their offspring as their live stock. Their moral principles of paying respect to the old and xiao make them consider the old or the parents much more than the young or the children, even one-sided. It is totally opposite to the natural characteristic of a living thing, which requires the old or the parents to consider the young or the children more.

• The relationship between Han Chinese and Han Chinese, or the relationship between Han Chinese and others

Han Chinese don’t consider other side’s interests and only calculate their one sided maximum benefit in the relationship between themselves and others.

Evil Han Chinese ethnic group

Why don’t I say some Han Chinese are evil? Why do I say the entire Han Chinese group is evil?

The reason is very simple. Han Chinese people means Han Chinese relationship. Han Chinese relationship causes Han Chinese people. There would be no Han Chinese if there’s no Han Chinese relationship. Then, would there be any Han Chinese with no Han Chinese traits in Han Chinese relationship?

Probably, there are a few “abnormal” Han Chinese in Han Chinese relationship. They are not typical Han Chinese. But they are thought “abnormal” and their number is tiny.

And it is just the fact, which can be discovered.

Abnormality and freedom

If you are a westerner, you can have some reasonable rights and you have the right to ask others not to violate them. Except that, you can’t restrict others, because others are free if they treat others fairly.

You can never restrict others to have the same personality, thoughts, or personal decision as yours. It is simply because others have the right of freedom. And others would never be wrong if they don’t violate your rights.

But Han Chinese are different. They use the word of “abnormal” very often to describe others. Then, what’s the normal one? The most normal one must be the same as the Han Chinese who describes others abnormal.

————-

So, what is hidden under the phenomena?

At least, there are two reasons for Han Chinese to describe different others abnormal.

1. Han Chinese themselves can’t enjoy freedom of thoughts/personality/personal life because of the pressure from others.
2. Han Chinese have serious psychological barriers.

And the above two can be discovered as facts.

Han-Chineseism

Han-Chineseism

1. If it isn’t a family relationship, I pursue my maximum instant benefit without considering others’ interests or my interests at another time (absolutely one sided and instant)
2. If it is my family relationship, I control my behavior to be restricted within the family rule.
3. Sometimes, the above two get mixed together. But usually, the above two are separated.

The “Han-Chineseism” can be used to explain most of Han Chinese controllable attitude/behavior/reason/response, but not all of them can be explain only because of this.

Psychological barriers, the pressure they are under, and the life pattern in their Han Chinese relationship also cause Han Chinese phenomena.

Han Chinese stupidity or evil

Are Han Chinese the smartest in the universe because of their Han-Chineseism?

Han Chinese mistakenly think they can be free from restriction when they make benefit with others. They don’t know the relationship between others’ interests and their own interests. They don’t know the relationship between truth and their interests. They don’t know the conditions of their own interests. Then, when they think themselves the smartest to make the maximum benefit for themselves without considering others’ interests or without considering facts (truth), or without considering benefit in a long time, they are actually the stupidest.

That’s Han Chinese stupidity or evil.

The only Han Chinese consistency

If you put what Han Chinese said and what they did together, you would find that there’s no consistency.

If you put what Han Chinese said or did at different times together, you would not find any consistency.

If you think Han Chinese have the conduct of “if conditions, then what human should do”, you would fail to find any consistency of their conduct.

It seems Han Chinese have no any predictable attitude/behavior/response/reason. But it isn’t true. There’s Han Chinese consistency, and that’s the only one.

The only Han Chinese consistency:

“If you and me are in a family relationship, usually I should adhere to the family behavior rules.”

“If you are not in the family relationship with me, and if I can make the maximum instant benefit for myself, or if I can avoid larger instant loss, whatever my attitude/behavior/response/reason is right. ” It is absolutely one sided and temporary.

Then, we can find the Han Chinese consistency or Han-Chineseism to understand what they say and what they do when they are in conflict with others (their dear from-the-same-wombs, or other ethnic minorities, or foreigners).

Why do Han Chinese offend Japanese in peace time? Because they want to be the upper group.

Why did Han Chinese comfort Japanese troops? Because they wanted to live longer.

Why is it wrong at this time, while it was right before? Because Han Chinese can benefit themselves more by stating it wrong at this time.

Why don’t Han Chinese have the same moral values as those they ask others to have? Because they can benefit themselves more by doing that.

Why is what Han Chinese do different from the image they use to impress others? Because they think they can benefit themselves more by doing that.

No consistency?

Absolutely consistent!

To be arrogant first inside then outside

Traditionally, Han Chinese have their pursuit and great strategy of being arrogant first inside then outside.

So, when they have their enemies both inside and outside, they fight against inside enemy first. If they have a chance, they would side with their foreign enemies. And after one of the Han Chinese powers won the infighting, the winner starts to be arrogant and uses other Han Chinese as tools (at the same time, they also make inside tensions). Once the upper Han Chinese think they are powerful enough to pursue to be arrogant internationally, they don’t hesitate because they have “risen”. But they have the problem of internal tensions. When they provoke other countries or get invaded by other countries, their power is disproportional to their resource. When they get defeated, the arrogance pursuers don’t pursue honor enough to fight to death, but all reasonably naturally surrender to their enemy to be the lower classed. (When they pursue to be arrogant, they also think it natural to surrender if they get defeated, and think they can pursue to be arrogant at another time when their enemy becomes weaker.)

Such Han Chinese behaviors can be found throughout their written history.

Concern rank difference much more than concern mutual benefit in Han Chinese relationship

In Han Chinese relationship, typical Han Chinese concern rank difference much more than concern mutual benefit. If you think the relationship is for people to benefit both sides more than when they are alone, you can’t be in a good relationship with Han Chinese. Han Chinese use relationship as a tool to make two kinds of benefit, the higher rank and offending the lower.

So there are tension and fighting in Han Chinese relationship all the time. They fight for higher rank and for the chance to use the other side as a tool to benefit themselves, at the same time, they fight against the other side to avoid falling to be the prey.

If you think you establish a relationship with others just to make both sides benefit more, that’s simply not a Han Chinese relationship.

The demonstration of Han Chinese politeness

How do Han Chinese demonstrate their politeness?

They call each other “Superior Zhang (老张)”, “Boss Zhang”, “Manager Zhang”, “Mayor Zhang”, “Handsome man Zhang”, “Beauty Zhang”, “Superior brother Zhang”, “Inferior brother Zhang”, and “Inferior Zhang (小张)”, because that shows ranking difference, and they think it polite.

They rarely call others, “Hi Mike” or “Hi Mary”, because that can’t show who is the superior or who is the inferior, and Han Chinese think it rude.

Han Chinese are concerned about ranking difference, but they aren’t concerned about equality or friendliness.

How to describe Han Chinese in a simple way

If I want to describe Han Chinese in a simple way, all of the below are true.

• Han Chinese is a group, of which the members are in the relationship between the upper and the lower all the time.
• Han Chinese distinguish between who can be the upper and who should the lower when they get to know each others, while not concern friendliness or fairness.
• Han Chinese can’t really know what fairness is.
• Han Chinese have the unbalanced personality in their unbalanced relationship.
• The unbalance causes most of the Han Chinese traits.
• Han Chinese use moral values as their tool to offend others, and free themselves from obligation.
• The only universal moral value for all of Han Chinese is that “human” should pursue to be arrogant, even if they have to kneel.
• Han Chinese put moral values lower than the upper ranked Han Chinese, and higher than the lower ranked Han Chinese.
• Han Chinese have most of its values opposite to natural human values.
• Han Chinese moral values are for unbalanced relationship, while not for natural human relationship. Their moral values don’t benefit either side in the relationship.
• The higher ranked Han Chinese have the attitudes/behaviors poorer than the lower ranked Han Chinese’s.
• Han Chinese are unbalanced and evil, but they are arrogant and look down on whomever they don’t fear.
• Han Chinese know what “truth” should purposely be, but don’t know what truth is.
• Han Chinese don’t know what facts are. They don’t know how to treat facts either.
• You can never understand Han Chinese with your natural human personality.
• Han Chinese don’t know your rights or my rights, but know who can be the upper and who should be the lower. And that’s the conduct of their behavior. That’s why they treat others and why they accept the treatment by others.

Those changing and those never changed

Those Han Chinese are changing all the time

• changing attitudes towards others
• changing values
• changing behaviors
• changing reasons

What are Han Chinese values, attitudes, behaviors, or reasons? It depends.

Whether Han Chinese fear you or not, Whether they think you are the lower or not, whether you are friendly or not, whether you violent or not, …, all affect Han Chinese attitudes, values, behaviors and reasons. (And you can control them if you know Han Chinese enough.)

———–

Those Han Chinese have never changed, and will not change if they are still Han Chinese

• the pursuit of being arrogant
• the pursuit of looking down on others
• the pursuit of being able to be inconsiderate
• the pursuit of being the higher ranked
• the pursuit of being others’ master
• the pursuit of releasing mental stress to others to enjoy the pleasure
• fighting for being able to look down on others and being able to treat others as the lower

No need to mention communists, Confucians, or most of Han Chinese in all their written history. The members of Han Chinese Democracy Movement, who want to fight for democracy, are the same. “I know we should fight for democracy (Democracy is good, but you don’t know), so I am the upper, so I can be arrogant, so I can look down on you, and I feel so good.”

Han Chinese even looked down on their masters in Mongol Empire and Manchu Empire. They also pursued to be arrogant when they knelt. And they looked down on the entire world in Manchu Qing Empire before Opium War. And today, they think they have risen. They can be arrogant again.

I am right because I can violently offend you.

Why are Han Chinese wrong? Why are Han Chinese right?

Han Chinese reasons,

I am right (and you are wrong) because I can violently offend you.

You are right (and I am wrong) because you can violently offend me.

————-

If you don’t know the above, you don’t know Han Chinese at all.

Han Chinese discrimination

Han Chinese categorize everybody into the higher and the lower. When there shouldn’t be the higher and the lower, or if others get categorized wrongly, or if there’s anybody categorized into the lower or the bad with the features nothing to do with the lower or bad, it causes discrimination.

Whom is thought by Han Chinese to be the lowly qualified, or morally lower, or inferior, or have to be the low ranked?

• the younger (by comparing to the older or elder)
• children (by comparing to parents)
• who is of the lower ranked ancestor (by comparing to the ancestry of the higher ranked)
• villagers (by comparing to city citizens)
• the cautious (by comparing to the reckless)
• the honest (by comparing to the virulent)
• the kind (by comparing to the cruel)
• the peaceful (by comparing to the violent)
• the friendly (by comparing to the unfriendly)
• the humble (by comparing to the arrogant)
• the polite (by comparing to the rude)
• the victim (by comparing to the offender)
• the harmless (by comparing to the dangerous)
• the consistent (by comparing to the inconsistent)
• the one who doesn’t fool others (by comparing to the one who fools others)
• the considerate (by comparing to the inconsiderate)
• the one who treats others fairly (by comparing to the one who treats others unfairly)
• the easier to be attacked (by comparing to the harder to be attacked)
• Japanese in peace time (by comparing to Japanese troops in war time)
• the monsters from the seas(洋鬼子) in peace time (by comparing to the upper from the seas(洋大人) after Han Chinese got defeated in war time)
• any ethnic group else (by comparing to Han Chinese)
• the one who can be offended by Han Chinese (by comparing to the one who can’t be offended by Han Chinese)
• the one who can forgive (by comparing to the one who can take revenge)
• the one who can make Han Chinese have loss (by comparing to the one who can’t make Han Chinese have loss)
• the one who can make Han Chinese fear (by comparing to the one who can’t make Han Chinese fear)

Han Chinese Evolution

When those in the upper rank or the low life in the upper rank become lower life in the upper rank, and limit the lower ranked ones to become higher-qualified, that makes people both in the higher rank or in the lower rank become lower further.

Many say that there’s no development in Han Chinese history. Roughly, it is true. Han Chinese even became morally worse in their history.

If we realize that Han Chinese means Han Chinese relationship, it is not hard for us to understand their history (from Qin Empire till today’s communism Empire).

Every Han Chinese is in Han Chinese relationship, which is between the upper and the lower. And every Han Chinese has to be restricted by Han Chinese relationship moral codes, which serves the upper and offends the lower. And the upper doesn’t think they should adhere to the same moral values, because they want to be different and to be the higher. Then, when they treat the lower, their attitudes or behaviors are like beasts’. They even act more savage than beasts. So, Han Chinese must be in the relationship between the higher and the lower. And the upper has more savage attitudes/behaviors and the lower can’t be thought better than the upper. It causes the quality of the entire group goes down. When the declining quality threatens most or all of Han Chinese lives, the relationship can’t be stable, and it collapses. After a period of turmoil, new relationship between the upper and the lower got established. And another cycle begins. That’s Han Chinese dynasty cycle.

Such Han Chinese characteristics happens to Han Chinese personal relationship, also happens to the relationship between Han Chinese ruler and the people.

Today, mainland China is still heavily influenced by Han Chinese tradition and communism. It is little influenced by western civilization. And it goes more like a traditional Han Chinese Dynasty. Other Han Chinese countries or areas are influenced by western civilization more, and when Han Chinese struggling between the western values and the traditional Han Chinese relationship, the state can be better than that in mainland China, but no match for western world.

.

Impolite, uncivilized, and fair

Examples (I name two Han Chinese PA and PB.)

PA shouts at PB arrogantly rudely, and PB answers angrily because of PA’s rudeness. But PA rebukes PB that PB should be polite, civilized or should be well educated. If PB remind PA of his/her rudeness, PA would order PB to stop quarreling and rebuke PB more.

Analysis

You would think PA should blame and rebuke him/herself while not PB. Why is the reality opposite to what should happen? Why is the value reversed by Han Chinese?

Usually, when you get blamed or rebuked by Han Chinese that you are impolite or uncivilized, it doesn’t mean you are really impolite or uncivilized, but you failed to make others think you can be arrogant. Nobody blame you impolite or uncivilized if you can make others think you are in the right rank and treat others in the manners fit the rank difference. But if you think people should treat each other politely, you will absolutely get rebuked that you are impolite or uncivilized or not well educated.

Han Chinese moral value of politeness or civilizedness has nothing to do with fairness or friendliness. Their moral values are one sided as the tool for the superior to offend the inferior, or for the offender to attack the vulneerable with blaming the victim. If you think moral duties should be under the precondition of fairness, You can never understand Han Chinese moral duties or the phenomenon that the should-be-blamed Han Chinese blame the should-not-be-blamed one.

Han Chinese war and peace

When Yue got defeated by Wu, Goujian was a peace lover, and a comfort man. And Xishi, the famous beauty, was a comfort woman. When Yue became more powerful than Wu, and when Wu had problems because Fuchai trusted Goujian and got fooled, Goujian wanted war and launched an attack.

When Liu Bang’s force was weaker than Xiang Yu’s, Liu let Xiang know he wanted peace by burning the Jian path. When Liu thought his force was stronger than Xiang’s, he wanted war.

When Han Dynasty was not powerful enough to win a war against Xiongnu, Han Chinese loved peace, and sent their beauty, Wang Zhaojun, to comfort Chanyu. When Han Chinese thought them powerful enough to defeat Xiongnu, they started a war.

(And none of the above examples are thought morally evil by today’s Han Chinese, but thought Han Chinese wisdom and learned.)

When Mongol calvary came, Han Chinese wanted peace, and they lived in Mongol Empire as the forth class and served Mongols as slaves and as comfort women.

When Manchu army came, they finally wanted peace by shaving their hair.

When Japanese army came, they served their enemy as comfort men and comfort women and so strongly desired for peace.

But today, Han Chinese think they are powerful again and they have been yelling “iron and blood”. They have been yelling “invade Japan to annex Japan after a Tokyo massacre and a great rape”. Han Chinese want war so much! They want war so urgently!

This is not Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace, but Han Chinese version of war and peace.

If you are a peace lover, please know Han Chinese more before you make peace with them.

A Falun Gong dynasty?

Falun Gong members have been tortured or killed by communist regime.

But probably, Falun Gong and its supporters are dreaming a Falun Gong dynasty, or at least, a dynasty influenced by Falun Gong.

But if you doubt whether Falun Gong can make people enjoy freedom or democracy, and if you want to discuss or argue with Falun Gong on some issues, you can’t expect you will be treated as if you can enjoy your freedom of speech, or freedom of your faith, or freedom of your ideas, your values, etc. Because if you disagree with Falun Gong, you would get responded, “You disagree with us? Do you know we are being killed! We are fighting against the oppressing evil communist regime! You want to make more of us be killed? Or you want to fight for the evil communists?” Then, your disagreement must be wrong.

It happens all the time when you want to discuss/disagree/debate/argue with the members of Falun Gong.

If Falun Gong really rules China, will it better than the communist regime? If it can enjoy the freedom of religion, can anybody enjoy any kind of freedom? Can any kind of truth be found?

Falun Gong is Han Chinese Falun Gong, which is characterized with Han Chinese traits.

You don’t know you should forgive?!

If Han Chinese are forced to admit that they treated you unfairly, they have another moral value to restrict you, “You don’t know you should forgive?”

Can it apply to themselves?

Today, they forgive the Mongol and Manchu minorities, and call them brothers, dear from-the-same-wombs. But in international relationship, they didn’t forgive Xiongnu, they didn’t forgive Mongols, they didn’t forgive Manchu, they didn’t forgive Japanese. They even manufacture evidence to prove how bad Japanese are.

In the relationship between Han Chinese themselves, they forgive the predominant side because they fear they would get hurt more if they don’t forgive, they forgive the upper because they think they should forgive. But if themselves are the predominant one, or if they think they are the upper, they hurt you more if you hurt them because the unbalance of hurt can only benefit themselves. And if they have to admit they hurt you after they did, they assign the moral value of forgiveness to you.

Forgive or not, it’s the typical Han Chinese relativity. The moral value is one-sided and exists as the tool to offend.

Contract obligation

Many Han Chinese like to sign contracts with others, because they can use contracts to restrict the other side. But they don’t restrict themselves. Whatever reasons, true or false, fair or not, consistent or not, can be used to avoid contract obligation by Han Chinese. But if you don’t fulfill the contract obligation, you get blamed or rebuked by them. It is Han Chinese smartness. And they have no sense when they do that way.

Why? It is because Han Chinese have been practicing the one-sided right/obligation in their traditional beautiful moral values. The practice makes all of those typical Han Chinese have their “Han Chinese moral sense” of one-sided right/obligation.

Please be careful when you sign a contract with Han Chinese.

How do Han Chinese define noble?

http://yamaguchy.netfirms.com/7897401/abbott/bonapart_15.html
How did Napoleon define noble?
…
In crossing a swollen stream, the captain of a company was swept away by the torrent.  A soldier, whom that captain had degraded in consequence of some fault of discipline, plunged into, the stream and saved the life of the drowning officer.  Napoleon heard of it.  Immediately he sent for the soldier. “You are a brave man,” said he.  “Your captain had degraded you.  And he had reason to do so.  In saving his life, you have proved that there is no rancor in your breast. This is noble.  You are now at quits.  But, as for me, I am not at quits toward you.  I appoint you quarter-master, and make you chevalier of the Legion of Honor.  To your captain you owe this promotion.  Go and thank him.”
…

How do Han Chinese define “noble”?
We are noble, because you can find the letter of “n” in the word of “Chinese”. And they define “nasty”. The “n” means nasty, because you can find the letter of “n” in the word of “Japanese”.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%E8%8B%B1%E8%AF%AD+chinese+noble+japanese+nasty&btnG=Search

———————–
(The same happens when Han Chinese define a behavior good or not. If it is Han Chinese behavior, it is good. If it is other ethnic group’s behavior, it is immoral.
If it is my behavior, and if you don’t scare me, the behavior is good. If it is your behavior, and if I don’t get scared by you, the behavior is bad. And if you scare me? Whatever you do is good, whatever I do is bad.)

The above is a basic Han Chinese trait.

Smartness and stupidity

Many Han Chinese think themselves are smart or the smartest in the world. And they think westerners quite stupid. But why did they lose to their rivals in their history? They think the problem is because it was easy for Han Chinese to fight against each other and other ethnic groups took advantage of it. Their failed history doesn’t mean they are not smart.

So what’s the Han Chinese definition of smartness or stupidity?

If you can play tricks to hurt others, or if you can make others accept unfair treatment, you are smart, because you can make others lose benefit to you. If you keep your promise, or if you treat others friendly or fairly, you are deadly stupid, because it is easy for you to lose benefit.

But why did the smart group get defeated or conquered by other ethnic groups? “It is because we are too smart.” That’s Han Chinese answer. So, the conquest by foreigners doesn’t prove Han Chinese stupid, but proves Han Chinese smarter.

—————

The truth is Han Chinese are extremely evil because they can’t take advantage of the power of human intelligence or society. But the westerners can by adhering to their values, and by examining their values.

Why do Han Chinese have such behaviors/values? And why do they explain their history in that way?

It is because Han Chinese relationship is one-sided. You can never find any equal opportunity in their relationship in their moral codes. And the one-sided relationship forces all of them to fight over the higher position. And if they can hurt others to benefit themselves, they think themselves superior. No wondering such relationship makes people have the values/behaviors opposite to the normal ones. And their relationship can’t make them stronger than those in normal human relationships. The relationship also makes them have fewer chances to take advantage of human intelligence, because rank difference affects life much more.

When Han Chinese are still in such a relationship, they are still in the state fitting the relationship. They can’t realize their evil, but explain their failed history by stating that they were “too smart”. Or, they simply don’t admit any failure in their history. That’s smarter.

The evil rebukes the good

Usually, those, who treat others fairly, solemnly, responsibly, earnestly, and seriously, get blamed or rebuked by the irresponsible ones.

Why? It is because the attitude of earnestness proves them the lower and unfit Han Chinese circumstance. And those irresponsible ones think themselves the upper. The upper rebukes the lower.

The superior ethnic group! That’s their superiority. That’s why they are not inferior. But the truth is they are so inferior!

From the upper to the lower

Because of Han Chinese unbalanced right/obligation in their unbalanced relationship, everybody wants to be the upper. But their history shows that it makes them become the lower in geopolitics, morality, or in quality.

The Han Chinese “upper” is not the fact of “upper”, but they make others think them the upper, don’t make others think them the lower. Because of Han Chinese right/obligation in their upper/lower relationship, they make others think them the upper by offending, humiliating others, violating others’ rights, assigning others responsibilities, robbing more opportunities. That makes them morally low. And it makes them politically weak. It is one of the reasons why they got conquered and ruled by their vastly outnumbered rivals. And since they think the learners the lower, the arrogant ignorant ones the upper, it lowers the entire group’s quality.

Don’t think it humiliating to ask the lower

One of the Han Chinese traditional beautiful moral values is “Don’t think it humiliating to ask the lower for knowledge”(不耻下问).

So, how to comment on the action of asking others for knowledge? Is it just because people want to know more to uncover the truth?

Yes, for normal people. But no, for Han Chinese.

Han Chinese think the learner must be the lower and the teacher must be the upper. They think they get humiliated if they ask others for knowledge. And since nobody wants to be the lower, it is difficult for Han Chinese to ask others for knowledge. So they need such a beautiful moral value.

But moral value means people are somewhat unwilling to do. So, the reality is Han Chinese “pretend to know anything when they don’t know”(不懂装懂) and they don’t ask others to avoid becoming the lower, or to be the ignorant arrogant (to make others think them the upper, or don’t make others think them the lower), or when themselves have done something ignorantly, they arrogantly rebuke others “Why didn’t you tell me it earlier?!”.

That is what exactly Han Chinese are.

Han Chinese reasons for “Japanese inferiority”

Han Chinese have the reasons for Japanese inferiority,

• because they were our students,
• or because their ancestors were from the area where today’s china is.

So, Japanese are inferior to Han Chinese

• because they were taught by us Han Chinese, (the superior made the inferior)
• or because their ancestors were of Han Chinese ancestry. (we are superior because of the ancestry, and Japanese are inferior because of the same ancestry.)

(because the Japanese inferiority is Han-Chinese-Made.)

It is why Japanese are inferior and why Han Chinese are superior.

————-

Are Han Chinese insane? They must be! Or else, how to understand all of their reasons?

————-

That’s typical Han Chinese. They can use the same reasons to prove others inferior and prove themselves superior, and they don’t have any conflict in their mind. This is a very important Han Chinese trait. Nobody can really explain Han Chinese behavior if they don’t know Han Chinese have the trait. (If you want to know why, it is because of Han Chinese unbalanced personality state under unbalanced pressure in the unbalanced relationship. A Han Chinese reason is true, not because of the fact, or fairness, or properness, but because of what rank they want to be in in the unbalanced relationship with others. The reason is true because Han Chinese suppose they are in some certain rank in the unbalanced relationship with others, and because of the rank difference or their desire for more or less interest, the reason should be true, while nothing to do with the fact or fairness. Han Chinese don’t look for facts based reasons to conduct their thinking or behavior, but look for reasons to prove their unbalanced state true. If you use “unbalance” to measure them, they are true in their Han Chinese purpose based unbalanced reasoning system, but obviously false or contradictory in a facts based reasoning system.)

How do Han Chinese think about theory?

Usually, Han Chinese think theory holy. They don’t know theory comes from facts. When they can’t use some theory to explain the new found facts, they don’t know they should look for a new theory to fit the new set of fact.

When teachers teach students some theory, usually they tell students how great the theory creator is and how it can be applied. So, when students learn theory, they learn holy books. The theory is true because the creator is great, probably as great as the God. If they learn some theory well, they are arrogant, as arrogant as the theory creator, the “God” in their mind, and they look down on anybody who don’t learn the theory as well as they do. If there’s anybody doubting the theory, it would offend them. “Who are you? Do you learn well? Learn it well enough before you doubt it!” “I think it is enough for you to learn it well. You want to doubt it? Look into a mirror to see who you are!”

Han Chinese have been telling the world how superior they are, but what they do proves they are so inferior!

You need help? You the lower!

If you ask Han Chinese for help, usually, you get the consequence of being despised.

“You need help? You can’t do? You don’t know? You the inferior! You the lower!”

That’s the price you have to pay when you ask Han Chinese for help. (Please don’t be confused. Sometime you can see them smiling when they help you, but it doesn’t mean they don’t despise you.)

Han Chinese right/obligation

What right/obligation do Han Chinese know?

Han Chinese don’t know your any right

• because you are a human,
• or because you are the member of the same country,
• or because you are in some relationship with them.

But they want to know your right or obligation

• because “are you the upper or the lower in the relationship?”
• or because “who is easier to get offended, you or me?”
• or because “who fears the other side more?” or “who is easier to be frightened?”

So, if Han Chinese want to avoid obligation, but have right and assign responsibility to others, they want to be the upper in the relationship, or they violently offend others, or they prove them the fearless, to be the upper.

He thinks me a vegetarian?!

A Han Chinese got angry and threatened, “He thinks me a vegetarian?!”

If you are not happy with others, properly, you should think if it is fair or not to either side. If not fair, you can seek fairness or justice. And whatever else you want to seek, what you can seek can not be beyond fairness.

But how do Han Chinese understand others’ behavior and the reasons? And how do Han Chinese think how they should do to response to others’ behavior?

Han Chinese think, if others made them unhappy, it must be because others think them easier to be offended, or because others think them the lower. And the only way to stop others making them unhappy is to let others know they are not that easy to be offended, or they can’t be treated as the lower. It is why Han Chinese say they are not vegetarians (which don’t eat meat), but carnivore (which eat meat) to warn others that they can attack.

Fairness? Justice? Oh, sorry, that is not in Han Chinese mind. Han Chinese relationship is established because there are the higher and the lower, the attacker and the surrender.

The robber and the coward, the value and the price

Nature is different from human. Nature affects human life. It is technically controlable (if scientists have already discover the secret), but the natural principles are unchangable. It is because human has a controlling part to control its wish, will, idea, attitude, and behavior towards others, while nature has none. If you find something naturally harmful, you should avoid it. You can’t fight against the nature or punish the nature to change its natural property. But if you find somebody treat you unfairly and threaten you that he/she will treat you more unfairly if you stand up to fight againt him/her, and if you treat him/her as the nature, you appease the criminal or enemy, and you will get treated more unfairly definitely, because those people think they can get more by hurting you more. So, there’s fighting between human groups or personels, but only techniques being used to control nature.
You can’t reverse them. If you treat human as nature, or if you treat nature as human, you will harm yourself.

We reveal the natural principles to develop techniques to control nature for our life. And we change others’ controlling part to change their attitude/behavior towards us. But what’s the relationsihp between you and others? What should right/obligation be assigned to all the parties because of the relationship? And  what can we do and how can we do if some part failed to fulfill the obligation?
There are multi ways to solve the conflicts between humans. Sometimes, negociation works. Sometimes, violent fighting works. Which one is better? It doesn’t depend on your wish, but depend on the other side. How other side changes his/her attitude/behavior towards you, the conditions, limits your choice to reach your wish or goal in the conlict. It doesn’t depends on your wish good or not.

Usually, Han Chinese don’t let others choose between this fair one or that fair one, but let others choose between the unfair and the unfairer. And usually, Han Chinese do make choice between the bad and the worse, while not make choice between fairness and fairness, or between goodness and goodness, or between honor and death.
Please don’t think the people, who accept the choice between the bad and the worse, are good-willed people, or kind people, or peace-loving people, or better world pursuer, or only stupid. They are also evil, because they think people should surrender to the predominant offender. And once they are predominant, they do offend others by letting others choose between the bad and the worse. Real good people don’t tolerate the violent offender by offering peace in any case.

Those people, who choose between the unfair and the unfairer, don’t need honor, or don’t fight for right values. They are cowards, offenders, and they are stupid.

Response to your explanation

If you disagree with Han Chinese, and if you tell them the reasons why you disagree or what you think they should do, Han Chinese would not ask if what you say is true or false, fair or not, but usually they would response to you by asking, “Who are you? (It means ” Are you the upper?”)” or, blaming you, “You are arrogant!”, or warning you, “If you say again, I will do more (against your will)”, or simply threatening, “Slap you!”

Why? It is because they think you must be the lower if you explain. No higher ranked Han Chinese do that way. Higher ranked Han Chinese shout, threaten, blame and rebuke to be arrogant, rude and violent. And in that case, the disagreed Han Chinese would accept like the lower accepts the upper.

And how do Han Chinese response to your behavior when you let them think you are a violent reckless attacker? Usually they satisfy you to avoid a fighting. But if you make them think you are peaceful and kind, they would threaten you by saying, “slap you”, or “beat you”, or “kill you”, …

You can never expect your reasons to be considered by Han Chinese only because the reasons are true or fair. Han Chinese accept anything from the higher ranked other Han Chinese, but they don’t think truth or fairness high enough.

Four super Han Chinese weapons

There are four super Han Chinese weapons.

Weapon 1, Military attack

Military attack if Han Chinese think they would be predominant in battlefield

Weapon 2, Shouting “human rights!”
Shouting “human rights!” and whatever values sounding beautiful if they are weaker and if they find their rivals are civilized enough to treat them fairly, or no need to worry about a barbarian attack. And they can cry and blame you that you are not civilized enough if they get punished because of their own unfair action.

weapon 3, surrender, kneel, and comfort
If they get militarily attacked by their predominant rivals in battlefield, Han Chinese surrender, kneel, and comfort to “be alive and rise at another time” .

Weapon 4, take advantage of their most powerful reproductive organs
They have the most powerful reproductive organs in the world. Han Chinese can use the powerful weapon to make “humans” protected with human rights. And when their number grows and grows, they become the majority. And they start to be the arrogant master of the world. And human rights itself becomes a problem at that time.

Can you use “human rights” to defeat Han Chinese when they use their super weapons?

If can’t, how do you think about your values such as human rights when your rival is Han Chinese?

===========

(Human rights, should it be “human skin rights”?)

Victim or Offender? (Han Chinese and Japanese)

Han Chinese have been crying and complaining that they were the victims of “the lower dog-fathered Japanese monsters”(狗日的小日本鬼子).
Those who have been doing that call themselves patriots.
They have been collecting or creating “evidence” to prove how inferior or how evil Japanese are.
They have been proving how good and how superior Han Chinese are.
So, they punish Japanese by attacking Japanese companies, which invest in china, to take revenge on the trade partners in peace time. And they insult and discriminate Japanese by proving that Japanese are inferior to Han Chinese.

Are they the victims or the offenders?
Are they patriots or actually hypocritical, rogue, arrogant offenders?
Why haven’t they kept their honor in war time, or kept their dignity in peace time?

When Han Chinese got offended

“I’ll hire thugs to beat you!”
“Don’t you fear I would beat you?”
“I gave you mianzi, or else, I have hired thugs to beat you!”
“I don’t want to escalate it, or else, I have hired thugs to beat you!”
What Han Chinese consider is not justice, fairness, properness, but threat, fear or not, beat or not, who I am, who you are, …

Fight for arrogance and fight against arrogance

Han Chinese are famous for their infighting. But why do they fight and what do they fight for?

Han Chinese fight against each other for arrogance and against others’ arrogance.

No Han Chinese are equal in their relationship. Han Chinese create any relationship based on inequality. Then, it means actually the relationship is between the offender and the victim. And Han Chinese make moral codes to solve the relationship problems between the upper and the lower. But naturally nobody wants to be the lower, the victim. Every Han Chinese wants to be the upper, the offender. When the relationship is already formed, they live in the unbalanced order to wait for their turn to be the upper. But if the relationship is not formed, all of them want to try their arrogance over others. It causes fighting. Everybody wants to lower others and make themselves the upper. It is what Han Chinese fight for and fight against. It is also why they fight against each others.

Categorizing animals and categorizing human

Usually, if animals look alike, they can be categorized into the same group. But if you categorize human in the same way, you would at high risk to make mistakes.

Why?

It is because human can be largely consciously controlled. And the consciously controlling part can be developed into very different characteristics. And individually, it has nothing to do with their appearance. (Probably there is difference between groups because of genetic difference. But it isn’t the case individually.)

So, when we categorize human, we should learn their values, conducts, reasons, how they response, their experiences, desires, knowledge, the way of thinking, the way of solving conflicts, how they control themselves, how they consider different parties’ interests, the feelings they experience when they are in some case, their pursuits, their personal history, … If we categorize human in that way, we would at lower risk than we categorize human because of their appearance.

How to apply my theory to Han Chinese?

If you know how I make the theory, you can know the conditions for you to apply my theory.

1. Han Chinese have Han Chinese traits. But there’s no single theory can explain all of the main Han Chinese traits. If you want to find some theory to explain all of the main Han Chinese traits, you can only expect a theory group. For example, Han Chinese behaviors show them lacking of enough wisdom, or lacking of enough moral values, but “relativity” can only be used to explain part of Han Chinese traits and it is not the cause, which makes Han Chinese. “One-sidedness” can be used to explain most of Han Chinese behaviors, but it is not the reason for all of Han Chinese traits. So, readers should look for a group of theory to explain all of Han Chinese behaviors, and they should sort out what theory can be used to explain what traits, and what reasons for what traits.
2. A theory is only a theory. It isn’t the direct facts. Any theory can only help us to understand the object. But it can never be the object itself. And when we find more independent facts of the object, we should examine our theory immediately. So, please pay more attention to the phenomena.
3. The facts of some object are not the object itself. They are the information in our mind. They are related to the object. But are they reflecting the object and only reflecting the object? We should keep that question in our mind all the time.
4. What Han Chinese can I explain with my theory? Actually, this question is not correct. I don’t research all of the people called Han Chinese or of Han Chinese ethnicity. What I research is Han Chinese traits, the people’s characteristics or its historical characteristics, which obviously doesn’t belong to other people or their histories. Since I research Han Chinese traits, what the difference between Han Chinese traits and Han Chinese people and their history? Han Chinese before Confucianism had already had most of today’s Han Chinese traits. And few of Han Chinese could escape from Han Chinese traits in or after Han Dynasty. And the same happens to today’s Han Chinese, because Han Chinese traits are not the traits developed personally, but developed in the relationship. So, the Han Chinese traits also means the traits developed in typical Han Chinese relationship and later the new Han Chinese causing the same Han Chinese relationship with others, which is characterized with one-sidedness, no universal values, dishonesty, psychological barriers, lacking of thinking power, inconsistence, hypocrisy, abnormality, inhumanity, etc. And they have their historical traits of hard to make progress, getting conquered by vastly outnumbered rivals, not being able to learn from lessons, being extremely arrogant, etc.
5. Please also distinguish between general traits and personal distinctions. What I research here is Han Chinese general traits. And I list them in the contents.
6. I sum up the conditions. When you read my theory, please keep in mind the Han Chinese relationship, the Han Chinese behaviors matching the Han Chinese relationship, and Han Chinese history. You can try to understand them and explain them.

Are you human if you don’t love your own government?

Han Chinese patriots fight for their patriotism and rebuke those Chinese who criticize china, “Are you human if you don’t love your own government?”

So, those patriots shouldn’t think Mao Zedong or communists human because obviously they didn’t love their own government, the Kuomintang government.

Those patriots shouldn’t think Han Chinese human because some of them didn’t love their own government, the Manchu Imperial government.

(Can’t Han Chinese values be applied to themselves? If no, do Han Chinese have any value?  Do they have the only value of restricting-others-and-freeing-myself?)

We are superior. But we have reasons to be inferior.

Han Chinese work hard to make their voice be heard through out the world, “We, Han Chinese, have been superior. We have five thousand years history of writing.”

But when they get asked to establish democracy, they would tell you that it’s not good to today’s Han Chinese.

How about freedom then? They have answered by asking, “Freedom? Freedom of murder?” They think Han Chinese can only be murderers if they have freedom.

How about law, justice, and fairness? Han Chinese would explain, “It takes the western world hundreds of years to establish today’s law system and social fairness. We just started it.”

When Han Chinese prove their superiority, they have all the reasons to be inferior.

Why do Han Chinese have to be a liar?

Why do Han Chinese have to tell a lie?

Han Chinese are under the pressure to consider what themselves or others want to hear, or what they should say if they want to impress others away from truth, or what they should say if they want to control others’ attitude towards them.

They are never under the pressure to consider fact. On the contrary, they morally beautify the famous liars or the hypocritical people in their history and they admire them. And they think they must tell lies to be a big man or a great man.

What if you don’t tell a lie?

If you don’t tell lies, Han Chinese think you are rude, or you are stupid, or you are offensive, or you are uneducated, or you are uncivilized, or you are inferior…

Then, more force to make Han Chinese tell truth, or more force to make them tell lies?

Han Chinese cruelty

Execution by one thousand cut, tearing animals alive, enjoying son’s flesh after cooked, …

Han Chinese have been described cruel. And they are really extremely cold and cruel.

Why?

It is because Han Chinese adhere to their cruel moral codes.

When Han Chinese consider one side, they don’t consider the other side in the same way in their moral codes. No Han Chinese moral duties are fair to both sides in their relationship. All of Han Chinese moral values are unfair to those who should put the moral obligations on themselves, and moral values are only designed for those who can enjoy the values. Actually there are moral master and moral slave in Han Chinese relationship. Han Chinese have their moral values not because they pursue fairness, but because they want to show who should be the upper and who should serve the upper. And after being under the pressure of moral duties and after being pressured by the beautified evil moral codes, the moral slave, the moral victim, becomes extremely cold and cruel once they have a chance to become the moral master.

Han Chinese think their moral codes beautiful. But they don’t realize that their moral duties are one sided, unbalanced, and the moral consideration is also one sided.

Han Chinese have no universal human moral duties, or moral consideration for all the parties in their relationship, but have the upper’s moral rights and the lower’s moral duties.  The one sided personality leads to their cruelty.

You are in China!

When western people come to china, they would complain. But they would get answered, “You are in china!”

You can’t complain because you are in china. Your values can’t be applied to china. China has its own values. You should follow Han Chinese values because you are in china! There are no general human values or universal values for Han Chinese to follow, but there are chinese values different from non-chinese values. So, Han Chinese think themselves different from the outside world. So, Han Chinese think themselves is another species in the world. But if you, the outsider, think that way, you would immediately get labeled with “racist”. You can’t argue, because you are in china. Han Chinese relativity doesn’t need the same conditions for the same statement.

Han Chinese want to be out of the restriction by human general values. But you should treat them as the same human as other human groups. So contradictory! Yes, because that’s in china.

Please don’t get confused. Please don’t think Han Chinese only treat foreigners that way. They treat their dear from-the-same-wombs the same way!

Whatever I, Han Chinese, am, whatever behavior I have, I can’t get criticized. I am absolutely right or superior under any condition. You think me wrong? It is because you are wrong or you are inferior. Or because you are criminal, you are attacking me.

Insider and outsider

If you are called the insider by Han Chinese, you should be treated rudely and you should not resist. Or else, you act like the outsider.

Han Chinese insiders have the right to treat other insiders rudely and have the right to restrict other insiders’ resistance. And Han Chinese have no right to resist to the rudeness by other insiders, but should put the obligation of non-resistance to rudeness on themselves.

And Han Chinese would get treated much better by outsiders than by their other insiders.

If you are called the outsider by Han Chinese, and if you are violent, you would get discriminated secretly, but get treated friendly.

Why can’t Han Chinese be normal?

Question: why can’t Han Chinese have normal values, or follow the normal values, or balance all the parties, or balance all interests, or balance all factors?

Simpler question: why can’t Han Chinese be normal?

Suppose that Han Chinese want to be normal. But why can’t they be?

The answer lies in psychological research.

What makes people evaluate the same thing differently?

What makes people feel “holy” (actually it is compulsory)?

What makes people have strong attitude/behavior tendency?

What makes people feel themselves uncontrollable?

What makes people have action before themselves know?

What makes people can’t be aware of the world in others’ mind?

What makes people can’t understand the values others hold?

What makes people live in the same planet but actually live in different psychological state and view the world differently?

What makes people different?

Obviously, these are not the questions, which can be easily answered. But I have to answer them if I want to explain Han Chinese.

What I have discovered is that Han Chinese unbalanced relationship, Han Chinese unbalanced psychological state, psychological barriers, the past life Han Chinese experienced, and the values Han Chinese have been taught or demanded to have and practice, make Han Chinese different from other ethnic groups, and make them different from any normal people.

Why should the world know Han Chinese more

I guess outsiders would know Han Chinese weak points more than Han Chinese themselves, otherwise, outsiders could not have defeated or conquered or ruled Han Chinese.

But up till now, Han Chinese still portrait themselves “the eastern mysterious”. It means they don’t think outsiders have already known them, or at least they don’t think outsiders have known the reasons for the state of Han Chinese, or they don’t think outsiders know how valuable the Han Chinese values are.

Here, I publish what I have discovered by analyzing my experience when I lived and worked with Han Chinese. If you would get shocked when you read the contents, and if your life is directly or indirectly affected by Han Chinese, I think you should know Han Chinese more and it would be helpful to your life.

Han Chinese is somewhat unknown. Please know them more before you regret.

Why Do I Research Han Chinese?

There are many people in the world interested in freedom, democracy, human rights, human evolution, human future, better life, etc. But surprisingly, few people are interested in what Han Chinese are or how they can be or how they affect our life. Probably, it is because Han Chinese are unwilling to know themselves, and it is not easy for the outsiders to know Han Chinese, or outsiders just don’t concern it. And there is a question for all of the outsiders to answer. Is it a racist action to research Han Chinese, especially when the outsiders find the negative instincts of Han Chinese? And probably because of this, outsiders are not interested in researching Han Chinese.

But Han Chinese exist in the world. And they have the largest population. And my experience tells me that Han Chinese seriously affect my life. I have the strong motivation to know what Han Chinese are and how they can be. And all of those serious strategists, politicians, and thinkers should know Han Chinese more exactly. It is also helpful for those, who are or will be in some relationship with Han Chinese, to know more about them.

We can research anything in our life, because we should do if those things affect our life.

The object and the research goals

The object is Han Chinese native speakers, whose mother language is Han Chinese language. This object is slightly different from Ethnic Han Chinese.

The goals,

• to discover the true Han Chinese

Human is special. If you research snakes, snakes don’t use language to tell you false information about themselves to fool you, or they don’t pretend to have another behavior different from that they really have when they are in the real circumstance, or they don’t have unconscious part different from conscious part. But human has all of these.
So, it is also one of the first steps to distinguish between true Han Chinese and false Han Chinese, between the surface Han Chinese and the inside Han Chinese.

• to discover Han Chinese principles, the laws governing Han Chinese when they are in the conflicts

What and how do Han Chinese do in conflicts? I try to sort out the principles of their attitudes/behaviors.

• to give a theory to explain how Han Chinese can be Han Chinese

Here, I don’t consider the affection by genetic difference, but only answer the question, why Han Chinese grow to have different traits from those of other ethnics if by supposing it isn’t because of genetic difference?

• to evaluate Han Chinese instincts

I think the world is over advertised by Han Chinese. Han Chinese have done too much to tell others how superior, how great, or how good they are. So, I think it necessary to evaluate Han Chinese instincts exactly. It is also why we can learn and make progress.

• to alert the world to Han Chinese instincts

Just want to let the world know the exact affection by Han Chinese or by their instincts.

The reasons for people to live in the same country

Why should people live in the same country or should be “united”?

Han Chinese think it is because of history. Because

1. our ancestors had ever lived in the same country
2. we are ancestry of the same

So, Han Chinese think all of Han Chinese in the universe should live in the same country, and they call it uniting.

And they think all of the territories occupied by Han Chinese should be the part of China.

And they think it is why Tibet, Southern Mongolia, Taiwan, Manchuria, …, should be part of China.

But their reasons can’t be used to explain why they didn’t want to live in Mongol Empire, or Manchu Empire, or Russian Empire, or Japanese Empire, …. And they should be united into Mongolia, Russia, Japan, … if their reasons are true.

Mongol ethnic dear from the same wombs

Today, some  Mongols live in Southern Mongolia. They are called “our Mongol ethnic dear from-the-same-wombs” by Han Chinese.

When Mongols remind Han Chinese of wars between the two groups, Han Chinese explain, “That is the fighting between brothers.”

So, Han Chinese attacked their Mongol bothers and later got conquered/ruled by their Mongol brothers, and they got killed, enslaved, raped by their Mongol brothers. That’s the brother-behavior. (How do Han Chinese define “brother” then? Does brother mean from the same womb but fighting against each other? It is exactly the Han Chinese behavior!)

The same happens to the relationship between Manchu and Han Chinese.

But it is different when Han Chinese treat Japanese. Han Chinese work hard to make evidence to prove Japanese are ancestry of the ancient people from today’s China, and Japanese had been educated by Han Chinese, and draw conclusion that Japan should be part of China and Japanese should be the lower citizens in China. At the same time, Han Chinese describe Japanese with their superior imagination to discriminate or slander Japanese.

Then, how to understand the relationship between Han Chinese and Japanese? The ancestors and the descendants? The teacher and the student? The superior and the inferior? The upper and the lower? The master and the rebelling slave? The owner and the possession? The good and the evil?

So, how can Japanese be good in Han Chinese mind? To bow to Han Chinese to be the inferior and to serve Han Chinese, and Japanese even should get ruled by Han Chinese, and Japan should be the part of China? Then, will Han Chinese immediately call them “our Japanese ethnic dear from-the-same-wombs”? And will anything happened to them become “We comforted our dear brothers”?

The Value of research

The value of research is to find the truth (fact or value) to avoid fooling ourselves, and to seek the principles of the object to take advantage of the object if the principles exist.

So, only if there are Han Chinese facts existing, or if Han Chinese traits or behaviors affecting themselves or others’ life, or if there’s any principle of Han Chinese value/attitude/behavior/reason to be found, it is valuable to research Han Chinese.

I suppose there are Han Chinese facts existing and Han Chinese are one of the factors affecting themselves or our life.

But is there any Han Chinese principle to be found?

The answer to this question can only be given in the procedure I analyze Han Chinese.

How to exist as a living thing

If the conditions of being alive get met, the genes can be kept alive. But there are many ways to be alive.

You can live like a master, you can also live like a slave.

You can live like an owner, you can also live like the livestock.

You can live with more rights and fewer obligations, you can also live with fewer rights and more obligations.

You can live as the ruler, you can also live as the ruled.

Wild animals, domesticated animals, livestock, pets, slaves, masters, owners, low ranked, high ranked, the ruled, the rulers, …, all exist as living things. But which one do you want to live as? If we make the mentioned above all have human face, they would all be your choice.

Sometimes, it is not easy to make the choice. You can live as a slave to keep your genes alive. But sometimes, probably you would like to live with freedom and honor, or else, you’d rather die.

Here, I suppose, people should think it the better way to live with supremacy or dominance, or else, they would rather let their genes disappear from the earth. It is another word to say competition.