“Why did I give birth to a person like you?!”

My mother has never thought she and me can be equal. She can restrict me, but I cannot restrict her. And we cannot argue or debate. If I have any opinion different from hers, she just thinks it proves that I am the poorly qualified, and I must be the lower ranked, and it is because I occupy the lower rank why my opinion is different from hers. She thinks I should make her happy. It is why it is valuable for her to have children. But she has never thought she should do anything to make me happy. And when I made her angry, she would cry, “Why did I give birth to a person like you?!”

She asked a very good question!
She should ask it. And it is her who should answer it. I really don’t know why she gave birth to me. But she should know.

But, what a pity! That question should have been asked before she had sex with my father. I don’t think any animal asks why it will have sex before it does. But I see all of the normal animals take careful of their children without any selfish purpose. Only human, especially the parents of the Han Chinese species, give birth to children or raise children with selfish purpose. Han Chinese really need to ask themselves why they have sex before they do. Even if they only think it for one second, it is much better than they have sex without thinking.

And they should ask another question, a more important question, what relationship should be between themselves and their children?

Why Do Han Chinese Look So Serious?

Where: china
When: 21st century

When I walked in the street with some westerners, they asked, “Why do Chinese look so serious?”
A good question.
Most of Han Chinese have to look serious when there meet strangers. If they don’t look serious, they would get punished. Most of Han Chinese think those people inferior if they don’t look serious. And Han Chinese think they have a chance to release their mental pressure to the inferior. And they will treat the inferior rudely arrogantly.
So, it is very important for Han Chinese to show others the coldness and seriousness to get secured. (They want to let others know “I don’t trust you and I am ready to defend myself if you attack me”.)
————
Another question frequently asked by westerners is “Why do Chinese like to wear a suit?”
It can’t be explained by exploring Chinese physical feelings when they are in a suit, but can be partly explained if we notice that Chinese concern how others think them (the superior or the inferior). They want to make others’ attitudes by wearing a suit more than their other concerns.

When Han Chinese Life As A Burden

When Han Chinese describe how hard their life is, they would say, “I have the old in the higher rank, and the young in the lower rank.”(上有老，下有小)
That’s Han Chinese life.

“A Village Whore!”

Where: china
When: 21st century

Usually, beijing natives treat non beijing natives very rudely and arrogantly. But what would happen if they see others are rude? (How do rude arrogant beijing natives interpret others’ rudeness?) And how should they do if fairly?

I was invited to a dinner in a restaurant.
One of the guests, a non beijing native woman, treated the waiters arrogantly rudely.
Another female guest, a beijing native, looked down on that woman, “A whore!” “A village whore!”

Questions,
Why didn’t that beijing woman say “Bad attitude!” “Rude!” “Unfair!” but said “A village whore!”?
Villagers must be bad? The bad people must be villagers?
And beijing natives must be good? The good people must be beijing natives? (Actually it is just opposite to the truth. Beijing natives think all of the non beijing natives are villagers, though bejing natives are partly parasites sucking others’ blood in china.)
What’s a beijing native whore, then? What’s the difference between a beijing native whore and a village whore? What’s the difference between a city whore and a village whore? And how many ranks are there for whores?
How do beijing natives interpret their own rudeness, violence, arrogance, or their sub-whore behaviors? (Morally superior or higher ranked? Or, “Your rudeness proves you are the inferior, my rudeness proves me the superior?“)

————
That’s typical Han Chinese.
They have no normal moral theory to explain bad behaviors or to reduce the rate of bad behaviors, but to use others’ fault to unfairly attack others’ identity to make others inferior (despite how inferior their own behaviors are). So, Han Chinese cannot improve their behavior quality, but create discrimination, and cause more behavior problems. And discrimination causes more social unfairness.

Such examples can be found in Han Chinese daily life.
You did something bad? It proves you are the inferior (while not because your behavior is harmful to human interests).
I did something bad? I have all the reasons to do that if I have no fear of you! And my bad behavior even proves me the superior because I can do something bad!

Example: Han Chinese Logic And Behavior

Where: china
When: the end of 20th century

I got violently attacked by an arrogant student (I name him A).
I told a teacher the story.
The teacher told another teacher (I name him B) who newly got promoted and directly handle students’ behavior problems.
Next day, I got told to talk to B.
I went to his office.
When I got in, he arrogantly looked out windows without a glance at me. Minutes later, he turned back to me and arrogantly ordered me to sit down. “Somebody said that it was you who attacked first.”
“Who said that?” It surprised me.
“Why should I tell you who said that?!” He rebuked me.
I told him what the fact was.
He shouted, “No, that’s not true.”
“You can go to the site to have a look. It is obviously not like what others have told you.” I answered.
“No need!!!” “I know the truth!” “Your view is illogical!” “It is me who handle the conflict. When I think you are the responsible, you have to be the responsible! I can punish you as I want! How to punish, as I want!”
I knew there’s nothing I could talk to him.
I left his office for another teacher (I name him C.).
When we were talking, B called C. C talked to B on the phone, ” … No, it is impossible. His wounds don’t look like made by himself. Obviously he got attacked … “
(Minutes ago, B said I attacked others. Minutes later, B said I wounded myself.)
And I could hear B said that it wasn’t true that the one who complained first was the victim. (It sounded true. But what’s the truth?)
C didn’t help B to distort the fact. But he didn’t want to solve the problem either. And he thought A was superior because he could fight.
I left C and went back to my dorm.
Two days later, one of my roommates told me that teacher B asked him to told me to surrender, “You said he distorted the truth, it is why he had distorted the truth. And he is newly promoted. New officers make three aggressive changes when they take office.(新官上任三把火) He wants to show others that he is rude violent arrogant enough to get recognized when he newly got promoted.(他要来个下马威) He wanted to make you scared. And he said if you think it was unfair, he will treat you more unfairly! You must stop making trouble!” And my roommate said other threatening words siding with teacher B and the attacker to force me to surrender. (Typical Han Chinese behavior.)
I didn’t surrender.
Later, another teacher talked to me. He told me that student A was good because he could get high scores, and A was from the north, so it was reasonable for him to violently attack others, nothing wrong with him, the only one who was wrong was the one didn’t know their habitual behavior.
That teacher admired student A because A could violently attack others. And he thought those student had the right to violent attack others if they could get high scores. (But he didn’t know usually A got high scores by cheating. And my good scores were nothing because I was not in close relationship with those teachers.)
…

Gradually, I knew why teacher B treated me in that way. It was because student A recognized his arrogance and flattered him. And B thought A was on his side. A was valuable for B to pursue arrogance, while I was not. And A could arrogantly offend others because he had a backer B.

The Change In Moral Values In My Life

1.
When I was a little boy, I got told that I should love the Party, love homeland, love the ruled (the people), pay respect to leaders, the teachers, the older (age or generation), parents, and treat others politely (actually treat others like the inferior treating the superior), and be happy to help others, and my parents told me to be lovely to make them happy. There were other moral values, such as honesty. But I have never been ask to treat each other equally, fairly, and act with dignity, and honor. (Only honesty was practiced. If I told lies, I would get punished. But the punishment was one sided. I could never ask the higher ranked to practice honesty. They taught children to be honest in a one sided way. And themselves could be dishonest and children could not blame them.)
2.
After I went to the university, the moral requirement changed. Probably it was because we were growing up, we should be taught to be mature. And the moral codes were practically changed to fit the order between the superior and the inferior. If there’s anybody staying in childhood believing in child-moral-values, he/she would be in conflicts with others who grew up to be “mature” earlier, and got labeled “immature”, and got looked down on. And the immature ones themselves would have mental conflicts. If the immature ones practiced those child-moral-values, they got blamed, hated, and stopped.
The immature students didn’t know what true moral values were, what moral values were hypocritical. And they would use those child-moral-values to be their behavior conduct and to restrict others, too.
3.
After I graduated, I was forced to be a mature man. If I was immature (adhered to child-moral-values), i was not only an immature fool, but also a useless tool of others. I would have problems when I wanted to find a job. And when I used those child-moral-values to restrict the superior or the “leaders”, I even angered them and got threatened.

————–
Han Chinese have moral values to restrict the upper or the lower with double standards. And Han Chinese all have to experience the U-turn moral-value-change in the years being raised.

Fuck your mom and fuck your wife

“Fuck your mom in the pussy!”

I don’t know how many Han Chinese or how many times they say that to others everyday. But I guess more Han Chinese say that more frequently than the Han Chinese who say “thank you” or “sorry”.
But, why do they (men or women) say,

“Mom’s!”

“Mom’s pussy!”
“Your mom’s pussy!”

“Fuck your mom!”
“Fuck your mom in the pussy!”
“I fuck your ancestor!”
“I fuck eighteen generations of your ancestor!”
And some women would say, “Fuck your dad!”
But they don’t say,
“Fuck your wife.” or “Fuck your daughter.” or “Fuck your son.” They don’t even say “Fuck you!”

Why?
What’s the difference?
Obviously, it is because of the generation difference.
Why can the generation difference be used to offend?
It is because of Han Chinese ranking difference between different generations and because the rights/obligations are different between different ranks.
So, it is definitely different between “fuck your mom” and “fuck your wife” or “fuck your daughter”. (One can be in the superior generation by fucking others’ mom or dad, and can only be in the same generation by fucking others’ wife, and can only be in the inferior generation by fucking others’ daughter or son. It cannot offend others for Han Chinese to say “fuck your daughter”. Han Chinese think it can only offend themselves to say “fuck your daughter” (to become others’ son in law to be the inferior). So, no Han Chinese say that. But a lot of Han Chinese say “fuck your mom”.)
——————————-
* Han Chinese say that to humiliatingly offend others.

As I Want!

How do Han Chinese show others their higher rank? They would shout at you, “It has to be as I say!”(我说什么就是什么), or, “I can do as I want!”(我想要怎样就怎样), or, “I can treat anybody in the way as I want!”(我想怎样对谁就怎样对谁).

So, when Mongols conquered and ruled Han Chinese, Mongols must have obeyed the orders from Han Chinese to conquer Han Chinese and to rule them.
When Manchu conquered and ruled Han Chinese, Manchu must have obeyed the orders from Han Chinese to conquer Han Chinese and to rule them.
When Liao and Jin attacked Han Chinese, Han Chinese must have ordered them to do so.
When Japanese and USSR soldiers raped Han Chinese, the rapers must have had to do, because Han Chinese ordered them to do.

Han Chinese, the considered master of the universe, think themselves higher than the God, if the God exists.

But, why have Han Chinese been crying and saying that they got invaded? Isn’t it what they ordered?

Between interests, rights and traits, culture, personality

What should we defend when we get criticized?

Simply, we should defend fairness and our interests under the condition of fairness.

Then, how to define fair or not?

• Rights/obligations fair or not. When we talk about fairness, we should consider the rights/obligations in the relationship. Then, it is the first condition of fairness that the rights/obligations in the relationship are fair, normal and proper.
• Facts. Another condition is needed when we talk about fairness. That is citing facts, while not defining the people good or bad, or any way else.
• Proper way of thinking. Fairness can be considered some true statement. And a true state depends on the way of thinking. Then, fairness also depends on properly thinking.
• Right to criticize. I think we have the right to criticize anybody. Other than thinking criticism attack, I would rather think criticism a way of learning. If we think that we have to take the same consequence others have already taken if we are under the same condition, then, we should study the consequence and its conditions. And others just offered examples. And if we are honest enough, we shouldn’t keep silent if we have found something is really harmful. If somebody just thinks that criticism equals to offending or attack, he/she must be extremely narrow minded. And those people can’t learn. We also have the right to learn if others harmful or not, and it’s also a way of protecting ourselves. Human rights can’t mean that nobody can be criticized. After all, criticism does not equal to slandering, incriminating, or framing.

So, despite how unhappy we would be when we get criticized, we should think it fair if the criticism is made under the conditions of fair rights/obligations, citing facts, proper way of thinking, and the right of the criticizer.

And we should distinguish between rights, interests and traits, culture, personality, knowledge, ideas, the way of thinking, behaviors, attitudes, … If one of them gets criticized, it doesn’t mean unfair, or it doesn’t mean your rights get violated, or your interests get damaged. Especially when your own traits, culture, personality, knowledge, ideas, the way of thinking, behaviors, attitudes, … all or partly are against your own interests, even against your protecting your rights, not only is the truthful criticism not the attack (from an enemy), but also it is helpful to your own interests.

So, good criticism is critically or pivotal to our own interests. If the criticism is also constructive, it can cause our development. But why are there people who can’t get criticized? Why are there people who can only think criticism hostile attack? What kind of people are they?

Anybody, if they are psychologically not free, can’t properly understand criticism.

Then, what conditions would make people psychologically not free?

• psychological barriers
• pressure from the unmet needs, desires or because of the wishes or needs under threat
• improperly experienced feelings
• pressuring relationship like the one between the superior and the inferior (Such relationship also causes no truth for everybody but ranking difference, partial personality, pursuing to be arrogant, and the way of thinking (because of ranking position, while not anything else.))
• improperly restricted by some habits developed compulsorily
• the experience of being criticized with being hurt (It makes people unable to distinguish between criticism and attack.)

Unfortunately, Han Chinese are under all of the conditions. And some of the conditions are only for Han Chinese. It is one of the reasons why Han Chinese haven’t been able to evolute in more than 1000 years. They just can’t learn. They can’t even learn when others point out their evils. They simply think the criticism the hostile attack. And they think the criticism mostly hurts (because of the psychological barriers which themselves don’t know) and makes them sound the inferior, what they mostly fear.

Han Chinese have been showing the world how superior they are. But the superior arrogant Han Chinese can’t even distinguish between interests and traits. “You criticize our traits? You must be fighting against our interests. You must hostile. You are even hateful. You must be our enemy.” Han Chinese traits become interests, while not the elements which affect interests. But Han Chinese think themselves the superior, superior enough to be unable to distinguish between the above two.

The same Han Chinese in different suits

Falun Gong’s trademark: truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance.

Falun Gong members or practitioners’ behaviors illustrated their trademark,

Truthfulness:

What we say must be the truth. You don’t agree with us? You told lies!!! You are a …ist. Your comment is …ism. You are hateful. You are narrow minded. You are biased. You are ignorant. You must be a communist dog. Do you think you have the right to comment on Falun Gong? We are the truth itself! And we are the victims. How can’t the victims hold the truth?

Compassion:

You should treat us kindly. Or else, you are cruel. And we will let you know what cruelty is!

Tolerance:

You disagree with us? You can’t accept our behaviors or Falun Gong theories? You reject our “kind offer” of annoying and disrupting? You slandered us! You deliberately incriminated us! You wanted to kill us! You don’t know what tolerance is! Do you know we have sentenced Jiang Zemin to death in the name of God? Jiang couldn’t tolerate Falun Gong and had the Gods shocked. And the shocked Gods just let him die.

We, Falun Gong members or practitioners, have human rights, because obviously we have human DNA. We are the victims! We should defend our human rights and the beautiful values, and we have been doing! If you say anything that shows you aren’t siding with us, you should get educated by United Nations! UN will let you know what human rights are! And we will let you know what truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance are!

———–

Communist regime also has its beautiful trademark: you can take whatever you want in a communism society, the people’s moral state will be exceedingly high, and all of the social conflicts or problems will disappear.

So, how to get into a communism heaven?

We should eliminate all of the class enemies. They are the reasons why we have been in a painful society. Let’s educate them by forcing them to work hard. And let’s kill.

Let’s take whatever we want from you. You resist? You are an anti-communism enemy! You don’t know communism means we can take whatever we want.

After the class enemy got eliminated, crimes would disappear. Because do you have any right to be violated? How can a crime be committed if nobody has any right? And when we attack somebody, it must be because he/she is a class enemy. And we simply define him/her a class enemy after we attacked him/her. Then, that isn’t a conflict inside a communism society. So, you should be careful to avoid being defined the class enemy.

And you should listen to or sing the songs to “Thank you the Party Mom for your kind milk”.

———–

Han Chinese traditional beautiful moral values: Xiaoshun (serve and obey), pay respect to the older, pay respect to the older generations, love the young, generous, loyalty, and happy to offer help.

And Han Chinese have been offering numerical examples in their 5 thousand of years of shining civilized history.

Xiaoshun:

The sons and daughters should obey parents’ orders, and even know what parents want before they tell their children, and children should serve their parents to make them happy. The children should know how hard it is for the parents to breed and raise them. If the children don’t serve the parents, the parents would rather farm pigs. The parents can eat pigs’ meat after feed them. How can the children be less valuable than the pigs?

Pay respect to the older, pay respect to the older generations:

You should know we have eaten more rice than you, we have crossed more bridges than you, we have seen or experienced more than you. Probably, we have eaten more salt than the rice you have eaten, we have crossed the bridges which length in total is longer than the length of the path you have walked on. How can’t you pay respect to us the older or us of the older generations?

And all of these are because our parents had sex earlier than your parents.

Love the young:

The young people, you should obey (听话). When having meals together, you should let us the older people eat first. If there are no enough seats, you should let us sit. You should serve us. You can’t have any idea different from ours. You should listen while not speak. You can’t reject our demanding. If you don’t obey, or you reject our demanding, or you even have different ideas from ours, we are sure we will rebuke you, educate you, or punish you. And you should appreciate us after getting rebuked. If you argue with us, I warn you that you will get slapped! Young (the inferior)!

Generous:

You should act generously when we demand you to donate. And you should not fight if your rights get violated. Are ourselves generous? Hm, we make you generous. It is generous.

Loyalty:

You should be loyal to me whatever I do. It’s loyal because it is unconditional. If you set behavior standard for the people you are loyal to, you are not loyal. You are rebellious or treacherous.

Happy to offer help:

If you refuse when I order you to work for me, I will rebuke, “Fuck your mom in her pussy! Do you know you should help others? How did your teachers educate you?!” (There’s no border between “happy to offer help” and enslave.)

———–

Chinese Democracy Movement’s trademark: democracy, and freedom.

We, democracy activists, have been fighting against evil communist regime because we want a free and democratic china. You even said we were not democratic? Do you know what democracy is? Is there anything you can know? You the blinded dog! (You should get educated, lightened, and rebuked by us. You the rude young!)

===========

Probably, there are exceptions among those groups. But most of the members of those groups behave like what I described above.

We can see how those beautiful values go to the opposite if there are no clear rights/obligations or fair consideration in the relationship. No moral value could be moral if the moral value isn’t considered impartially and fairly benefit both sides. And that’s why the extremely good becomes the extremely evil.

Han Chinese traditional beautiful moral values, communism dreams, democracy goals, and Falun Gong’s trademark, all are the same Han Chinese in different suits.  They don’t know what rights/obligations are. They can’t think in the way of fairly considering all of the parties’ rights or obligations. They don’t know what should the normal relationship be between people, between people and natural, between one’s interests and one’s traits. They don’t know what fairness is at all because there’s no rights/obligations in their minds. And the one-sided personality makes them go opposite to their beautiful words. Hypocrisy, inconsistency, contradiction, and abnormality developed in their partial relationship are their real trademark. And that has never been changed whatever suits they were in since they had their written history.

If Han Chinese are still Han Chinese, how can they have the future like westerners’?

Invaders are my envy!

After defeated by invaders,

Han Chinese comforted the invaders. But they have never comforted me.

Han Chinese have served the invaders. But they have never served me.

Han Chinese knelt to the invaders. But they have never been expected to kneel to me (I don’t want it, either).

Han Chinese treated the invaders so friendly. But they have never treated me friendly like that.

Han Chinese arrogantly rebuke me. But they didn’t rebuke their invaders.

Han Chinese educated me to make me become the person meeting their demanding. But they didn’t educate their invaders.

Han Chinese master me. But they didn’t master the invaders.

Han Chinese rule me. But they didn’t rule the invaders.

Han Chinese tell me what’s right what’s wrong. But they didn’t tell invaders that.

Han Chinese can’t accept me if there’s anything different from their demanding. But they accepted any behavior, any attitude, any idea from the invaders.

…

Oh! Really, invaders are my envy! I, the “dear-from-the-same-womb” of Han Chinese, have never enjoyed “invader-treatment”.

============

Only one arritude is the same. I don’t have to think it my envy. That is Han Chinese arrogance. They look down on me. And they even looked down on the invaders when they knelt on the gound (sure they despised their conquerors SECRETLY when they warmly smiled to invaders).

“Open Your Hands!”

Where: beijing
When: the end of 20th century

There’s an exhibition showing people what great progress Chinese Communist Party had achieved.
I got a ticket and went there.
I waited in the line to get checked (for security).
When it was my turn, I stood at the check point to let the security people to check me. A woman in uniform ordered me to do what she wanted. But she was very rude, arrogant, and unhappy. Exactly I’d say she was hateful, because she saw I was young, didn’t look violent, and more because I was apparently not a beijing native. After she checked my body, she ordered me to open my hands with discrimination, hatred and anger in beijing accent. I was not able to understand what she said immediately, because of her fast, discriminating, and hateful accent. Then she ordered me to do again hatefully without looking at me. I still could not understand what she said. All of a sudden, she thundered “Open your hands!!!” with extreme hatred and her faces looked like heated to be red. I opened my hands. She checked and shouted “Go!”.

It is my experience to enjoy the achievement of my great homeland.
It is the treatment I got from the people living in the heart of my great homeland.
It is the treatment from my dear from-the-same-womb.
And it is one of the footmarks of what Han Chinese have been telling.

The Street Of Tang People

Chinatown is called “唐人街” in Han Chinese, which means “the street of Tang people”.
But,
Tang Dynasty existed from A.D. 618 till A.D. 907.
This year is A.D. 2008.
2008-907=1101
There are main dynasties of Song, Yuan, Ming, and Qing in last 1101 years of Han Chinese history.
Why don’t Han Chinese call chinatown “the street of Song people” or “the street of Yuan people”? Aren’t Song or Yuan Han Chinese history?
Do Han Chinese forget their own shining civilized history? Why do they forget it?
Have Han Chinese had their own history lost?
Where are 1101 years of Han Chinese history gone?

Although, Han Chinese show others their 5000 years of shinning civilized history all the time to prove their superiority and despise other ethnic groups, they don’t even know whereabouts of the latest 1000 years of their own history.

Can the arrogant group answer those questions?

“German Are The Most Foolish People In The World!”

Where: china
When: 21st century
One of my working colleagues told me that his friend came back from Germany. His friend told him the breaking news about his great discovery. “German are the most foolish people in the world! They believe whatever you say!!! They are the easiest to be fooled!!!” “But, (sigh) they only trust you one time. They won’t trust you any longer once you fool them.”

“I Want To Honor You. But You Are Even Inferior Enough To Reject!”

After their rudeness, or arrogance, or offensive request getting rejected, some extremely rude arrogant Han Chinese would say “给脸不要脸!” to the victim. It means, I wanted to honor you, but you were even inferior enough to reject the pride.
They don’t think others have the right to reject them.
They think they honor others when they offend others.

So, when Mongols invaded them to “honor” them, they were superior enough to take the honor and knelt. When Manchu invaded them to “honor” them, they were superior enough to take the honor to kneel.

And, when they fought against Mongols, or Manchu, or Japanese invaders, they must have been inferior enough to reject the honoring. And is it even the reason why they didn’t fight to death in the battlefield, because they wanted to get honored?

Han Chinese are unbelievably evil. The arrogant one-sided! The arrogant insane!

“I Give You The Chance To Serve Me.”

When you ask others to do something for you, probably, you think you should say “Thank you” to others.
But in many cases, Han Chinese reverse it.
If Han Chinese think themselves superior than others, when they master others to do something for them, they say “I give you the chance to serve me. If I don’t, even if you want to serve me, you cannot.” Then, others should say “Thank you (for your giving me a chance to serve you)” after serving.

I remember that when Chinese emperors wanted to kill somebody, the victim must say “Thank you for the great giving”.

What an arrogant group!

Han Chinese is really different from, even opposite to, any other group in the known world. After all, this is a group that can look down on its masters with their knees getting down on the ground.

The Heroic Sanyuanli Anti-British Invasion

Where: Sanyuanli Village, Guangzhou, China
When: AD 1841

“In 1841 the city offered stubborn resistance to the attacking English troops, with the peasants of Sanyuanli (today a suburb of Canton) particularly …”
Han Chinese describe it as a heroic action. And it is a victory over the English invaders.

But in 1841, Han Chinese was ruled by Manchu.
They didn’t resist to Manchu rulers. They fought for their Manchu masters.

That’s Han Chinese. And they are Han Chinese “heroes”!

8=10

8=10
Can it be mathematically true?
You would say “no”.
But Han Chinese do the math everyday.
Usually, in free markets in mainland china, if the buyer wants to buy 1 Jin of some commodity, the seller gives only 8 Liangs of it. (1 Jin = 10 Liangs = 500 grams, 8 Liangs = 400 grams = 0.8 Jin ) And few feel strange. If the buyer gets angry, he/she will soon be under pressure from the seller and the bystanders, as if it was the victim who had offended the offender. The resisting buyer will get blamed “So serious!” “Narrow minded!” “You don’t want the seller to make profit?” “Give up!” “You break the market order!” …
The offender has all the reasons to offend, and along with the bystanders, they have all the reasons to oppress the resistance.

What a Han Chinese value!

“I Won’t …, Even If I Got Beaten To Death.”

“I won’t …, even if I got beaten to death.” (打死我也不…)
It is very popular.
Many Han Chinese say that everyday.
Han Chinese say that to express how much they don’t want to do something.
“I won’t go there, even if I got beaten to death.”
“I won’t buy it, even if I got beaten to death.”
“I won’t do it, even if I got beaten to death.”
…

But there are questions.
Is it their duty to get beaten? Do others have the right to beat them? Do others have the right to ask them to do something by beating them? Can they make any decision because of getting beaten or not? If getting beaten, should they obey others? If getting no beaten, should they be absolutely free?
Is it their right to do something? If yes, why don’t they say “It is my right to do …, I will fight back if anybody stops me by beating me.” Or, if it is their right not to do something, why don’t they say “It is not my duty to do …, nobody can force me to do by beating me.”
Why getting beaten or not becomes a reason for Han Chinese to decide to do something or not? Why is it related to getting beaten or not for them to do something?
Why don’t they say “Nobody has the right to beat me. Please prepare for getting beaten back if you beat me.” Why do their words indicate that others have the right to beat them?
If Han Chinese want to intervene others, do they think they have the right to beat others?

(It is not a minor problem. It is a big one, even one of the biggest Han Chinese problems. It shows the reasons for Han Chinese behavior. And it shows how Han Chinese understand the rights and obligations. And in many cases, it can be used to explain Han Chinese behaviors or attitudes towards others. It reflects Han Chinese psychological state, personality state, the state of Han Chinese relationship, and it affects Han Chinese attitude, behavior, philosophy and ethics theory or moral conduct.)

I am a bully. Who can scare me?

Who is right? Who is wrong?

What is right? What is wrong?

Why is it right? Why is it wrong?

Han Chinese have their hanchinese answer.

“I am a bully, who can scare me?”(我是流氓，我怕谁？) That’s the Han Chinese answer. And it is very famous and popular. Most of Han Chinese know that. Why? It is because Han Chinese can get scared by a bully and surrender to a bully. And when you are a bully, you can make others get scared, who can scare you, then? That’s Han Chinese.

Since a bully has nobody to scare, he/she must be right, and must has all of the rights, and must be free to do anything, because nobody can scare him/her to restrict him/her. Scared or not, becomes the reason for Han Chinese value and behavior conduct. That is one of the foundations of all of Han Chinese ethical theories. Simply speaking, if I am a bully, I can’t be wrong and I can act freely as if others are not existing or others have no any right. Right or wrong is because of having somebody to scare or not, while not because of fairness. The rights or the obligations, dignity or honor, isn’t their concern or the reason for their behaviors.

So, the people, who are in the highest rank, must be the number one bully in the ranking system and they are absolutely right. And if they get attacked by stronger foreign force, they don’t fight for honor to death. They simply surrender, because they think they should surrender to a bully, and the bully is right and Han Chinese themselves should be wrong. That’s also their personality and the behavior conduct. That is just the reality of  Han Chinese, the Han Chinese individual personality, or the Han Chinese ethnic group’s “personality”.
=============
remark,
The bully is a relative one. Relatively, the stronger is a bully, and the weaker is not. The violent one can be a bully, the peaceful one can’t. A is stronger than B, A is a bully. But if A is weaker than C, A isn’t a bully, while C is.

Hateful shouting victim and patriots

When I was in beijing, I found that most of beijing natives hated non natives, and if they had to talk to non natives, usually they shouted hatefully arrogantly like the master even tyrant and as if they were the superior, though they were not competitive when they went to schools or when they tried to find a job.

But when I remembered that they or their ancestors were victims of invaders, I couldn’t believe how they could be the victim. So arrogant, so hateful, so vicious, so violent victim? And I, others also, was asked to struggle for the rise of china. What’s the rise? The rise of arrogant offender? The rise of arrogant beasts in human skin? The rise of hatred? The rise of hateful rude “victim”? How could such arrogant rude animals become the victim? It just puzzled me a lot.

And non beijing natives were caught by their dear “from the same wombs” to Changping concentration camp. And they thought it a patriot action. Patriot? To hate and enslave and expel their dear “from the same wombs” to be patriots? So, should I fight against my dear from the same wombs to be a Han Chinese patriot, too?

How much difference between the evil and the Han Chinese Victim or Han Chinese patriots?

Why Not Working As A Comfort Woman?

I had ever read a book in beijing library. The author told a story to show how bad Kuomintang soldiers were.
…
When Kuomintang army fought against Japanese army near Tianjin
…
A wounded Kuomintang soldier went into a brothel in Tianjin city, scolding
“I, the superior man (老子), sacrificed in the front line! You enjoyed pleasure in whorehouse!”
He angrily ordered a prostitute to serve him.
After the sex service, the soldier peed.
Then he ordered the prostitute to drink up his urine.
The prostitute hesitated.
The soldier took out his gun to force the prostitute to do. And she did.
…

The author concluded that Kuomintang soldiers were that bad!

But I want to ask questions.
Had any Japanese soldier forced Chinese comfort women to drink up his urine after sex service?
If the Chinese prostitute had a chance to choose between to serve her dear from-the-same-wombs and to serve Japanese invaders, which one would she prefer?
…

Han Chinese is the ethnic group deserving all it has suffered from!

War Over Territory or War Over Arrogance? China-India War 1962-1963

War over territory or war over arrogance? China-India War 1962-1963

What I can know in china about the war
1. We won easily.
2. We gave those military devices back to India after having them repaired to despise Indian and to humiliate them.
3. Surprisingly, the territory is still in Indian hands (Arunachal Pradesh).

What’s wrong with Han Chinese?
Probably, there are many explanations. But arrogance is absolutely one of the factors affecting Han Chinese behavior.

Li Zicheng, Wu Sangui, and Manchu

The story of Li Zicheng, Wu Sangui, and Manchu , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Shanhai_Pass

I want to ask questions,

Han Chinese Wu Sangui has been portrayed traitor.
1.
But if Wu hadn’t asked Manchu for help, what could he do? Should he have waited to get attacked, or to get humiliated, or to get eliminated by his dear from-the-same-womb, Li Zicheng, to show his loyalty to Han Chinese ethnic group?
2.
If Han Chinese Li Zicheng hadn’t been a traitor of his own ethnic group, why did he attack the frontier soldier Wu by engaging most of his power relentlessly?
3.
Should Li humiliate Wu when he asked Wu to surrender? Should Li be arrogant, rude, and humiliating?
4.
If Han Chinese thought it most important to keep their honor when they were under the pressure from invaders, should they have examined their own behaviors or attitudes towards each other to keep united?
5.
Why was it so difficult or even impossible for Han Chinese to unite and fight against invaders?

—————————————————-
There is the law of Han Chinese, which governs them:
If I am the superior, I can treat the other side offensively and humiliatingly, but at the same time, I think the other side should surrender to me and to be under my rule. They don’t expect the victim to  resist.

Under that law, they act in the Han Chinese way. But the other side is naturally unwilling to surrender or cooperate after getting offended. And if the other side still has considerable power, they would resist. If there’s the third party, despite it is foreign force or not, the weak side will look for help from the third party. Then, the Han Chinese history happens.

Huang Gai’s faked surrender and the Nanking Massacre

Huang Gai’s faked surrender is crucial to allies’ victory over Cao Cao in the battle of red cliff.

But, I’d like to ask,
Can surrender be a faked one?
Can anybody use the faked surrender to fool their enemy to win the battle?
If the answer is Yes, then
Can their opponent trust them?
How to treat them if they surrender?

Then, let us come to the Nanking Massacre.
Did Han Chinese surrender to Japanese?
Even if Han Chinese had surrendered, could Japanese trust them? Would it be another faked surrender?
What could Japanese do in that case?

Any better choice other than chopping all of those untrustworthy heads off?

Superiority and inferiority

Han Chinese:

We are culturally superior. Mongols and Manchu could conquer us, but they couldn’t conquer our culture or our personality. On the contrary, they got influenced by our culture. And in the end, it is our culture that conquered Mongols and Manchu, while not us who got conquered by them. It is us Han Chinese with our superior culture and personality who became the conquerors.

We are superior to our conquerors and our rulers.

===============

But it is one of the reasons why Han Chinese are inferior. They only need superiority to be arrogant, while not learn the lessons and seek the truth to become superior. Han Chinese can’t learn.

Because we are the victims (Han Chinese)

Because we are the victim of Japanese, westerners, Manchu, Mongols, … We, Han Chinese,

want to have a “great Tokyo rape”. Why? Because we are the victims.
want to have a “Tokyo massacre”. Why? Because we are the victims.
call Japanese “the dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters”. Why? Because we are the victims.
call westerners “the monsters from the sea” or “the monsters”. Why? Because we are the victims.

have good reason to commit the copyright theft. Why? Because we are the victims.
can sign contracts to fool others to violate others’ rights. Why? Because we are the victims.
can force our dear “from the same wombs” to accept our offending in the name of patriotism. If they resist, we would rebuke them, “I fuck your mom in her pussy. Don’t you know we are the victims? Don’t you know to take the pride back?” Why? Because we are the victims.
have been proving the Mongols and Manchus are beasts. Why? Because we are the victims.

And,

You would not know that the exact reasons are because we are arrogant, rude, and proud to be the offenders, and we can immediately become the rogue if we get defeated or get punished.

To Restrict Oneself And Free Others

Han Chinese have their traditional beautiful moral value of “To restrict oneself and free others”(严以律己，宽以待人). And they show those words anywhere to let others know that they are the group of beautiful moral values.
But what does the moral value exactly mean?
Does it mean Han Chinese treat others like what they say in their moral value?
Whom do Han Chinese use it to describe? Themselves or others?
Like any other Han Chinese moral value, you cannot understand it just because of the words.
No Han Chinese describes themselves “I am the person who restricts myself and frees others.” When they describe people with those words, those people must be others. So, others restrict themselves and free other people. And the describers are the beneficial ones and praising the self-sacrificed others.
Many Han Chinese use that moral value as their motto. But the motto is not shown themselves, but shown others. It means those, who see the motto, should restrict themselves and free others.

All of Han Chinese beautiful moral values should be interpreted in that way to be the truth.

“You want to make a decision on your side alone, don’t you!”

Where: china

When: 21st century

There’s something wrong with my computer. I searched information in newspaper and found some. I made calls. And I made an agreement on the phone that I would pay 50 Yuan after my computer got fixed.

But I got charged 120 Yuan.

I argued that I had made an agreement on the phone.

“But we should charge you 120 Yuan.” answered the repairer.

I continue arguing, “You can’t change it without negotiating with me. You shouldn’t make a decision on your side alone.”

“So, you want to make a decision on your side alone, don’t you!” shouted the man.

==================

Remark:

That’s the typical Han Chinese way of argument. There’s no negotiation between two equal sides to solve problems but either this side or that side to make a one sided decision to solve the problem, just like the upper rules the lower. The voices from two sides can’t be equally heard or be fairly considered.

Han Chinese with their unbalanced psychological state just can’t have it in their mind that solutions can be found based on equal rights.

And that’s one of the reasons why Han Chinese are locked in power struggle all the time. Nobody wants to be the lower to be governed by the upper in conflicts.

What cruel loneliness do western people suffer from!

Han Chinese think western people are cruel, because they leave the old people alone. And Han Chinese use that as an evidence to prove themselves are kind, better and more civilized. And it’s the reason for them to force younger generations to go back home to make the old family member not lonely. And they don’t think it cruel unfair to the younger generations. They don’t think it abnormal or harmful to the entire group either.

You need my help? It’s the time for me to control you.

Usually, when typical Han Chinese give a hand to those who need help, they would say, “Don’t forget that we have ever helped you. You should pay back when you rise one day.” or, they would set conditions for the help, or they would act like the owners and threaten, “You don’t obey? I will abandon you!” And to control others is the main reason why Han Chinese help others.

If we don’t pay respect to the old, should we pay respect to the young?

If you argue that we shouldn’t pay respect to people only because of the age difference, or on the contratry, we shouldn’t despise people only because of the age difference, you would get rebuked by Han Chinese, “If we don’t pay respect to the old, should we pay respect to the young?” That’s what Han Chinese can find in their mind. Nothing else.

Either cede or fight. No third choice

At many intersections in china, you can see the slogan, “You should think you’d rather cede 3 minutes than fight for 1 second earlier.”(宁让三分，不抢一秒) What Han Chinese can find in their mind is either cede or fight. Han Chinese can’t find the  third choice.

It is because Han Chinese have the unbalanced mind in their unbalanced relationship. They can’t even know there’s the third choice other than the choices for the upper or the lower.

No values for anybody, anywhere or anytime

There are many Han Chinese moral values or behavior conducts. They are even “beautiful”. But one of the Han Chinese traits is that there’s no values for anybody, anywhere or anytime. So, when you got blamed, rebuked or retorted by Han Chinese, you can’t ask, “Why did I do anything wrong, I just did the same as that they (Han Chinese) did?”or, “Why is it wrong at this time, but it was right at that time?” or, “Why is it wrong here, but they (Han Chinese) didn’t think it wrong there?” And you would get rebuked, “You are you, are you the same as us?” or, “Now is now, then is then!” or, “Here is here, there is there!” You just can’t try to find any consistent reason in Han Chinese values for anybody, anywhere or anytime. And no “real Han Chinese” adhere to the values for anybody at anytime in any place. They adhere to the moral value or conduct of “How we need it”. And all of the typical Han Chinese have the only “consistent” one.

Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why did Japanese invade china? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why did Japanese fight on our land (actually, Manchu Empire’s land) against Russian colonists? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why did Japanese leave Asia? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why have we, Han Chinese, been so arrogant? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why did we work as comfort men or comfort women for Japanese invaders? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why did Japanese conquer a large part of Asia? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

why did Japanese fight to death in battle field? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why are Japanese bad? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why have Japanese products been sold all over the world? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why do Japanese have factories in china? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why do the inferior Japanese (小日本) call us china(支那)? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

Why do Japanese use Han Chinese words? Because we think Japanese are the inferior.

The dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters!

Who are we, then? We are Han Chinese the superior!

Because we are fighting against the evil.

There’s another reason for Falun Gong members to be right.

We, Falun Gong members, didn’t offend others after we offended others. Why? It is  because we were fighting against the offender, the communists.

How can Falun Gong be evil? We are fighting against the evil communists!

We are fighting against the evil! How can ourselves be evil?

——————-

(If it isn’t because of truth, fairness or justice? What can restrict Falun Gong members’  behaviors? And how can’t themselves be evil? That’s my question.)

Because we are the victims. (Falun Gong)

The members of Falun Gong,

Falun Gong is good. Why? It is because we are the victims.

Falun Gong is right. Why? It is because we are the victims.

Falun Gong can’t get criticized? Why? It is because we are the victims.

If you criticize Falun Gong, your speech must be a hateful speech. Why? It is because we are the victims.

We, the members of Falun Gong, can be arrogant and rude.  Why? It is because we are the victims.

We can force others to accept our advertisement. Why? It is because we are the victims.

We can violate others’ rights. Why? It is because we are the victims.

We can offend others. Why? It is because we are the victims.

We can arrogantly judge others and rule others. Why? It is because we are the victims.

We act as if we were the master of the universe. Why? It is because we are the victims.

Because we are the victim, we can be so arrogant, so rude and so vicious.

Facts? Truth? Fairness? Justice? We hold all of these, because we are the victims.

========================

Remark 1

How did I get to know Falun Gong?

(Although Falun Gong is just an example of my theory, instead of being interested in Han Chinese, most of the readers are interested in the information about Falun Gong much much more. And I want to talk a little more about it.)

Scientists can’t explain all of the phenomena.

I didn’t know what Falun Gong was until 1990s. I had two classmates who were the fans of Falun Gong. They tried to explain anything by citing Falun Gong theory. And one of them argued with a teacher in class. His main point of view was that scientists failed to explain everything in the world, and it meant physics failed, and some new theory was needed. Another classmate asked, “Since you said your theory could be used to explain everything, can you know what I am thinking?” That Falun Gong classmate answered, “I know you are thinking that I can’t know what you are thinking.” Another Falun Gong fan shared a room with us. I didn’t know what his theory was exactly. But I knew he had never been wrong. He just couldn’t be wrong. He was right and more than right. He was arrogant and inconsiderate. He could ask for anything and treat others in anyway, and he was not wrong. But if others behaved in the same way, others were seriously wrong. No matter what conflict he was in with others, others were wrong, he was right, despite he behaved unfairly and against his own values. And he’s the ruler of the room. He could poke his nose into others’ business and could force others to obey his rule by threatening to use force. He just confused me a lot. How could he behave against his own theory and so inconsistent?

Years later, I went to a university. There’s a place for Falun Gong practitioners to practice their Gong. They listened to Falun Gong music and danced. I knew one of them, a young man teaching engineering in that University. One day when we went to class, we accidentally started to talk about Falun Gong. It gave him a chance to give a long speech, though I was the only audience. His main point of view was the same as that I heard before. Physics failed. We needed a new theory to explain the world and guide our life. And in the end, he stated that physics more than failed, it made our life painful. We needed another way of life. I couldn’t argue with him. What I could do was to smile. After all, I thought he should have the right of speech freedom, though it was in china, under the communist regime. He saw me smiling and he knew I didn’t agree with him. He then despised me, “Young!” (Han Chinese think young means inferior.)

Defending freedom

On April 25th, 1999, over 10,000 Falun Gong members surrounded Zhongnanhai practicing their Gong. They explained that they just wanted to practice their Gong, nothing else. It confused me further. USA is the defender of freedom in the world. Can American government accept 10,000 members of some group sitting and surrounding White House to practice some sports for their health? If they wanted to fight against the communist regime, why did they say they just practiced their Gong? If they just wanted to practice their Gong, why did they surround Zhongnanhai?

I also heard that many Falun Gong members went to a TV station to protest. (That young teacher was among them and got caught to a custody.)

And later I heard that thousands of Falun Gong members went to a Press to protest an article written by He Zuoma. I got astonished. If Mr. He said something wrong in his article, I thought the right way to protest was to offer facts to disprove his point of view. Why did so many Falun Gong members go to that Press? Did it mean they would be right because they protested? Did it mean they would be right because they could show their numbers? And did Falun Gong members thought others had any right to comment or have different thoughts, even if the thoughts were wrong? If Falun Gong members wanted freedom, did they know others should also enjoy the same freedom as that themselves wanted? It was because of that event, I started to think that Falun Gong was another oppressive group. I couldn’t expect any freedom under a Falun Gong regime if they succeeded.

Fighting against the evil communist regime

Soon after the Zhongnanhai Dafa Practice, Falun Gong Group got banned in china. But we still directly “communicated” with Falun Gong. How? We could get fax from overseas Falun Gong Group. All of the contents in those faxes were anti communist regime or “truth telling” to tell others how cruel communists were, and some of them also advertised how good Falun Gong was. But why did Falun Gong members think we were in need of their fax? Why did they think we wanted to get their fax at midnight? Why did they think we needed their spam? Falun Gong fax became one of the most annoying spam faxes.

When I chatted on the interest, I also got a lot of spam information from Falun Gong members. Those Falun Gong members sent their information to me to interrupt the conversation. And it made me not be able to continue the conversation. Did Falun Gong members think it polite? Where’s my freedom of conversation on the internet? It made me to fear Falun Gong more than I feared communist regime. I could see police in internet cafes. But if Falun Gong ruled the country, could we enjoy more freedom of talking on the internet?

And, if you are really interested in Falun Gong, you would not forget the woman, who disrupted President Bush’s meeting communist president Hu. I know Falun Gong were fighting against communist regime, but didn’t they think there’s no better way to fight other than to disrupt others?

I must be a communist dog because I disagreed to what Falun Gong members did.

And I must be helping the communist regime to kill more Falun Gong members. I must be … (more words for Falun Gong members to define me, or to explain me, or to describe me.)

Truth, Kindness, Tolerance

Falun Gong’s trademark, “Truthfulness, Kindness (compassion), Tolerance”. But how true? How kind? How tolerant? It’s amazing to see themselves opposite to their own slogan!

Sentencing Jiang Zemin to death

Jiang Zemin was sentenced to death in the name of God according to one of the posts on Falun Gong website. So, the victim sentenced the offender to death. The victim is the judge. The victim judge sentenced the offender. Victim? I see them the ruler. The ruler victim?
And the death sentence in the name of God?
And I remember their slogan of “Truthfulness, Kindness, Tolerance”. Tolerance?
So terrible!

Hypocrisy, Double-standards, and One-sided

If you disagree with Falun Gong, Falun Gong members or practitioners think you must be hateful, intolerant, and virulent, and you must be smearing, slandering, and helping the communist regime prosecute them and deceiving others. Why? Because they are the victims. But are Falun Gong members or practitioners extremely intolerant, hateful, and smearing others to make others the victims of them the “victims”?  And they are killing their killers in the name of the Gods in their imaginations. What if they were really in power one day? How hypocritical those “victims” are! How vicious those “victims” are! They talk about justice, but everything is one-sided there. They never need to examine themselves.

Strengthening the communist regime

Falun Gong has been fighting against communist regime. It’s the fact. And another fact is that communist regime has never been as “popular” as it today since the end of 1970s. Why? One of the reasons is that Falun Gong scared many. Chinese have to choose between communist regime and the possible Falun Gong regime (or possibly Chinese democracy movement regime, or Confucianism regime). Chinese have to think what life they would have to live under a possible Falun Gong regime. And they have to support communist regime (willingly or reluctantly) to avoid the worse one.

Remark 2

I don’t think my words can make Falun Gong members suffer more. But I really worry about my own life if I have to live under a Falun Gong regime, because of my own experience.

Peter the Great, and Deng the Old

Petr Alekseevich is called Peter the Great.

Deng Xiaoping is called Deng the Old.

Petr Alekseevich is called the Great because people think he modernized Russia in 18th century.

Deng Xiaoping is called the Old because people think he modernized china (more or less) in 20th century.

In a Han Chinese mind, the title of the Old is similar to the title of the Great, and can only be given to those old great people.

So, western people have to adhere to those values, which can make them great, to get titled the Great, no matter what age they would be at.

So, Han Chinese have to live longer to be titled the Old.

When foreign enemies invade, those people, who title others the Great, can’t think it great to live longer without honor. But those people, who title others the Old, can’t think they would get titled the Old if they fight to death in battle field. What they should do is to surrender and live longer, long enough to get titled the Old.

And you can explain part of Han Chinese history.

Cede and fight

One of the Han Chinese traditonal beautiful moral values is to cede.

One of the Han Chinese phenomena is infighting.

Why?

Why can’t cession make Han Chinese more peaceful, but more aggressive?

It is because of their beautiful moral value of ceding.

Nobody naturally wants to cede. Then, who should cede?  Why doesn’t the other side cede? Doesn’t the other side think it beautiful moral value? If yes, how can the other side accept the cession? Not contradictory?

The fact is

• the lower cedes rights to the upper,
• the vulnerable cedes rights to the stronger,
• the fooled cedes rights to the hypocritical,
• to cede rights to you at this time and offend you more at another time.

So, why do Han Chinese cede? It is because they are forced to do, or fooled to do. And when they don’t think they should cede, or when they don’t know who should cede, they fight.

It’s the time for me to be arrogant.

If you ask Han Chinese for help, most of them would think, “You need help? It’s the time for me to be arrogant.” And they would look down on you. Even if they really helped you, they would educate you or rebuke you to let you know you are the lower and themselves are the upper.

But there’s also a way to get helped without being looked down on. If you order others to serve you when you need help, and shout at others if they failed to offer help, and if others don’t resist to you, you won’t be looked down on. On the contrary, you would be treated as the upper.

That’s Han Chinese.

The definitions of some words

The definitions of some words

• superior/inferior (upper/lower). A president of some organization would be thought the superior by comparing to the members of the organization, and vice versa. A more qualified person can be thought the superior by comparing to the lowly qualified, and vice versa. A hero can be thought the superior by comparing to those who make troubles, and vice versa. Any persons can be thought the superior if they adhere to higher value-standards, and vice versa. But here, “the superior” means somebody is unfairly, unreasonably or improperly treated as the predominant one largely because of policy, tradition, his/her arrogant attitude, or because of the result of power struggle. And “the inferior” can be defined in the same way. When it becomes the basic relationship in a society, the entire society becomes evil, and all of its members become evil.
• equality. Equality means everybody can get the same result/consequence if they meet the same conditions and they are offered the same conditions for the same result/consequence. And different people get different results under different conditions, they can exchange the results by exchanging the conditions without thinking it unfair.
• fairness. There are two kinds of fairness. One is rights/obligations-based fairness in a freely established relationship. It means, if I agree to such a relationship, then I fulfill the obligations and have the rights. The other one is normality-based fairness. If it helps human life, then it is fair, or vice versa.

Main reason for Han Chinese evils

Why are Han Chinese “naturally” arrogant, rude and liking offending the vulnerable, the kind, the considerate, or the friendly? And why are they “naturally” cowardly to fight against the offender?

Why could Han Chinese accept Mongols’ rule or Manchu’s rule, but couldn’t they accept their children leaving home (escape from their control)?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about freedom, others’ freedom or themselves’ freedom?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about fair, normal and proper rights/obligations, or rights/obligations-based fairness? But all of them know what superior/inferior is, and all of them try to find out whether others see them the superior or the inferior. Why?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about facts, but keep in their minds who is the superior, who is the inferior?

Why are the arrogant Han Chinese comparatively lower qualified, and why do they demand others to be higher qualified? Why do “the superior humans” become sub-beasts?

Why do Han Chinese fight mainly over “who can be the arrogant”, and why is it the main reason for Han Chinese infighting?

Why are Han Chinese so hypocritical?

Why are Han Chinese so inconsistent?

Why do Han Chinese give the reasons, moral values, theories, or knowledge contradictory to their own attitudes/behaviors, or against themselves? And why don’t they think they have any problem, but think themselves the superior or the smarter?

Why do Han Chinese have no fact-based standard, but have the standard of “how I see you” or “how I would be seen” to settle the dispute in the relationships?

Those are main Han Chinese evils. And the main reason for those evils is the evil in the relationships between Han Chinese themselves, or between Han Chinese and others. Han Chinese relationship is between the superior and the inferior. It forces everybody’s psychological state or personality state compulsorily partial, one sided, prejudiced. So, Han Chinese are naturally not able to think or act fairly, or fact-basedly, or adhere to universal moral values.

He threatened to beat me.

One day, my father came back home trembling. I had never seen him scared like that. He murmured, “I found I was very coward.”

When I asked what happened, he said, “A man passed by and said I was in his way. I told him it’s not really. He stayed and threatened to beat me. I found I was so coward.” He was still trembling.

I got shocked.

My father was a family tyrant. He was our master and he had never been wrong whatever he did because he treated us violently. And he could tell us to do whatever he wanted. In his mind, we were nothing but tools.

But then, the tyrant was trembling. The tyrant was a coward when he encountered another tyrant.

Proud of offending and smart to surrender

“I wanted to beat them. But later I found they were stronger than me. I was afraid I would get beaten by them. I fled.”

The above Han Chinese confession is not rarely to be found.

If Han Chinese can offend others (violate others’ rights or treat others offensively), they don’t think it bad, but would be proud of it.

If Han Chinese get offended by a tougher one, they would like to surrender and think themselves smart.

Han Chinese don’t have a universal behavior conduct reference frame or coordinates system. They don’t have a consistent value/attitude/behavior conduct, either. Wrong or right, good or evil, stupid or smart, when and who should be thought right or wrong, all depend on what Han Chinese want or what conditions they are under.

Rights/obligations? To have the rights/obligations as the conduct of values/attitudes/behaviors? That’s not Han Chinese.

Because I didn’t look down on you!

“Why did I sell the product to you? You should know it is because I didn’t  look down on you! (那是因为我给你面子！) (So you should appreciate me.)”

Or, “Why did I buy your product? You should know it is because I didn’t  look down on you!(So you should appreciate me.)”

If you blame Han Chinese after you got offended by them, Han Chinese even say, “Did I offend you? I treated you in that way, because I didn’t look down on you! (It means, if I looked down on you, I would not offend you. You should say thanks to me (after getting offended by me).)”

That’s Han Chinese. They are arrogant like that.

So, why did they surrender to and comfort Japanese troops? It must be because they didn’t look down on Japanese troops. Or else, they would look down on Japanese troops and would not surrender or comfort. (为什么我们投降？为什么我们慰安？那是我们汉支那给了你们日本人面子！！是我们看得起你们！要不是给你们面子，我们才不会投降呢！我们才不会慰安呢！小日本！)

So, why did they surrender to Manchu and had gotten ruled for 267 years? It must be because they didn’t looked down on Manchu conquerors.

So, why did they get conquered by Mongols and had gotten ruled for 89 years? It must be because they didn’t looked down on Mongol cavalry.

So, why did they cede large part of territory to Liao and Jin in Song Dynasty? It must be because they didn’t looked down on the invaders.

(Dignity and Honor? Rights/obligations and fairness? Interests and normality? Sorry, we Han Chinese don’t know what they are.)

My family and my country

Who had I been in my family before I left it?

• I was definitely the lower in my family (lower than anybody who was older than me, or of older generation).
• I had no rights in my family. (I could get food to eat. But it was not because I had any right. I couldn’t defend it. My parents could stop giving me food if they got angry at me. They thought I should guess what they needed and serve them like a good servant to make them happy. It was why they thought me worthy of their food. And they thought the food was their giving. I should “thanksgiving”.)
• They also thought I should be the lower when I was in the relationship with the people out of my family.
• My parents and grandparents acted as the lower when they were in the relationship with the people out of my family.
• They didn’t resist to the offenders out of my family. They surrendered and they beautified their behavior.
• They thought they were the lower when they were with others out of my family. And they thought me lower than them. And then, I should lower further than the people out of my family.
• When I got offended by the people out of my family, my parents helped the offender to oppress me.
• But my parents thought I should make them proud by winning the competition with the people out of my family, or make them proud by getting in the higher rank out of my family.
• I was born the tool for my parents or grandparents to reach their goal. And the pressure on me was so strange and so contradictory.

.

Who was I in China?

• I was the lower. I should pay respect to the old, the officers, the wealthy people, …, but nobody was asked to pay respect to me. I should be treated as the low classed if I left my hometown. And communist regime made the policy to treat me as the lower classed even if I stayed in hometown because people had different rights/obligation in different areas.
• I was asked to think myself the lower. It means I should criticize myself whatever I was, whatever I did, and should praise others whatever, and treat myself as the lower.
• I could seldom ask for my rights if I wanted to be a good person. I should try my best to devote myself to others.
• I had no rights to resist to the offender.
• There’s no right, no fairness, no justice. I was the lower. And I should be the lower. And I should be happy to be the lower. It was me in my country.
• But I couldn’t criticize Han Chinese as the lower. Han Chinese as a group must be the superior, upper and good whatever they were, whatever they had done. So I must, I had to, be the arrogant upper because I was Han Chinese. But they all treated me as the lower. So contradictory. So odd.

.

My family and my country treated me in such a similar way.

Han Chinese reasoning

I am arrogant and rude, but I have all the reason to be right, you have all the reason to be wrong if you blame me.

If the same thing happens to you, it proves you are the inferior, wrong, and the lower. If it happens to me, it proves me right, superior to you and I am the upper.

That ethical reasoning system is what Han Chinese have been working hard to develop in their thousands of years of history.

You are wrong, because I want you to be wrong and I want to prove you wrong. And the reasoning is what I have smartly developed.

I am right, because I want me to be right and I want to prove me right.

Relativity in Han Chinese rights/obligations

In a Han Chinese mind, there’s no citizen rights or citizen duties. But all are relative rights or relative obligations. It means, I have rights/obligations or not, it depends on the rank difference between you and me. The upper has all the rights and no obligations, and the lower has no rights but all the obligations.

It is why Han Chinese treat each others as if the relationship between them is between the master and the slave. And their attitudes or behaviors are also one sided. You can’t find their behavior conduct like ” I should treat others that way because others are the citizens of the same country, or because others have some rights.”

It can also be used to explain why Han Chinese engage in infighting all the time. How can they know who should be the upper or who should be the lower if they don’t fight?