It is fair because you can offend the third party to get compensated after you had loss.

You can’t find fairness in Han Chinese moral values. But Han Chinese have the reasons to let you know their moral values are fair. For example,

1

When you are asked to serve the older generations, they would say, “You can ask your children or grandchildren to serve you in the future.” That means it is fair for you to serve the older generation today because you can get compensated when you become older.

2

When you got offended, usually, Han Chinese don’t encourage you to fight for justice, on the contrary, they would enlighten you, “You can offend the third party to get compensated if you can offend.” They think it fair.

…

It is fair because you can offend the third party to get compensated after you had loss.

Fair?

Cede and accept the cession

There’s a famous Han Chinese story titled “Kong Rong gives up the pear”(孔融让梨 Pinyin: kong rong rang li).
In that story, Kong Rong is morally good, because he, as a little child, knows he should gives up his rights to his elder brother, the superior.

But I have a question.
Is the one, who accepts the cession, morally good?
If yes, both accepting the cession and ceding should be morally good. But they are opposite to each other.
If no, why should people think it morally good to cede?

—————–
That’s a typical Han Chinese moral value, which is one-sided.

Motivation and facts

How do Han Chinese hit back when you uncover their facts, which make them sound not that superior?

They will never ask if it is the truth or if it is fair. But they would ask if you are evilly motivated. (You reveal their facts because you are virulent. Or else, you would help them to hide the facts.)

But are Han Chinese themselves virulent to do something themselves don’t want to show others? Were themselves evilly motivated when they behaved?

“If I can’t attack, I can cede!”

If Han Chinese got offended and if they got frightened by the offender, they would arrogantly find the solution, “If I can’t attack, I CAN cede!” ( “惹不起，躲得起！” Pinyin: re bu qi, duo de qi). Or, they would offer the solution to others by arrogantly rebuking, “If you can’t attack, CAN’T you cede either?’

Han Chinese are even arrogant when they surrender.

And they only know offense and cession. You can’t expect to hear Han Chinese saying, “I don’t attack. But I don’t cede either.”

I-hope-you, I-hope-everybody

Sometimes, we would say, “I hope you will get better soon.” or, “I hope everybody can enjoy their lives.”

But Han Chinese have more “hopes” to others. They would say,

“I hope you will serve your country more after you grow up!”

“I hope everybody can donate their love to others!”

“I hope you will change your attitudes in the future!”

“I hope you won’t behave in that way in the future!”

“I hope everybody will take action to make it better!”

“I hope you will serve your parents!”

“I hope you will not fail the mission assigned by others!”

…

Can the hoped hope back?

What are those “hopes”?

No, the hoped can’t hope back. If they do, they will be thought astonishingly arrogant, rude and make those hoping people extremely angry! All of those “hopes” are restriction, ordering or obligation assignment by the superior or the self-supposed-superior (to the inferior or the supposed inferior). But Han Chinese say that even if they are not officers. It is the Han Chinese way of arrogance.

But Han Chinese don’t think, they even don’t know, that’s arrogant, rude. It becomes their pride to hope others in that way.

Finnish had conquered Russians twice!

Mongols conquered Han Chinese

Date	Late 13th century
Location	China
Result	Mongol Conquest
Territorial changes	Han Chinese ceded all of their territory

Belligerents

Mongols

Han Chinese

Population Resource

0.8~2 million

60~100 million

Natural Resource, Area

Smaller at the beginning

Larger at the beginning

Natural Resource, Economical or Military Resource

poor

rich

Manchu conquered Han Chinese

Date	Around 1640 AD
Location	China
Result	Manchu conquest
Territorial changes	Han Chinese ceded all of their territory

Belligerents

Manchu

Han Chinese

Population Resource

About 1 million

50~100 million

Natural Resource, Area

smaller

larger

Natural Resource, Economical or Military Resource

poor

rich

If Finnish were Mongols or Manchu, they had conquered Russians twice! Because in winter war, Finnish VS Russians

Winter War

(Most of the data are copied from Wikipedia.com.)

Date	November 30, 1939 – March 13, 1940
Location	Eastern Finland
Result	Interim Peace
Territorial changes	Moscow Peace Treaty

Belligerents

Finland

Soviet Union

Population Resource

3.5 million

170 million

Natural Resource, Area

0.37 million km²

22.4 million km²

Natural Resource, Economical or Military Resource

poor

rich

Commanders

Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim	Kliment Voroshilov
	Kirill Meretskov
	Semyon Timoshenko

Strength

250,000 men	1,000,000 men
30 tanks	6,541 tanks
130 aircraft	3,800 aircraft

Casualties and losses

66,548 total casualties	391,783 total casualties
26,662 dead	126,875 dead or missing
39,886 wounded	264,908 wounded
1,000 captured	5,600 captured
	2,268+ tanks

The resource comparison between Mongols/Manchu and Han Chinese is so close to the comparison between Finnish and Russians. If Mongol and Manchu are renamed to be Finnish, and if Han Chinese is renamed to be Russian, the Russians had been conquered by Finnish twice and ruled for 356 years in total.

But it didn’t happen in western history.

——————————–

(It is one of the reasons why I admire Finnish the brave.)

100% proper and 100% wrong

If you got offended by Han Chinese, and if you fought back, and if there’s the Han Chinese third party intervening in the offender’s favor. The third party would say,

“You reacted to your offender? You didn’t behave 100% proper!

Is the offender 100% wrong? Your offender didn’t behave 100% wrong! You shouldn’t think others totally wrong.”

So, who should be blamed and who should be defended? The third party would say,

“You should be blamed because you didn’t behave 100% proper. And your offender should be defended because he/she didn’t behave 100% wrong.”

So, who is right? Who is wrong? The third party would say,

“You are wrong because you didn’t behave 100% proper.

Your offender isn’t wrong because he/she didn’t behave 100% wrong.”

So, who should get punished? The third party would say,

“You should get punished because you didn’t behave 100% proper!”

=============

Does it sound pretty true?

Is corruption bad?

Is corruption bad?

Han Chinese in mainland china have their theory,

1

Capitalism is bad, because you can see corruption happens in America, UK, France, Japan … Socialism is good because we want to eliminate corruption from our society. And we are good because our nation is a socialism country.

Their reasoning,

We are good and USA is bad because of the supposed corruption.

(It indicates that corruption or not is the criterion of values.)
2

How can you say communist regime is bad because of the corruption? How can we be bad? Can’t you see there’s also corruption in America?

Their reasoning,

We are not bad because we just have the same problem as USA. Corruption can’t be the criterion of values.

(It indicates that USA itself is the criterion of values.)

———————-

What is the real Han Chinese criterion of values?

“We can’t be bad. We must be good.” That’s the real Han Chinese criterion of values.

============

Remarks,

I changed the structure of the contents after Jose posted the comment and replaced the word of “are” with “must be” in the last sentence. But I didn’t change other contents.

Dare, fair and fear

If Han Chinese think others are against their wills, and if they don’t get scared by others, usually, their first response is to shout to threaten, “If you dare! (你敢！Pinyin: ni gan)” (It means I will attack you to make you scared if you dare to do. Usually the attack is an violent one, or power-abuse.)

It can’t be expected that Han Chinese response to those against their wishes by asking, “Is it fair?”, and stop others by making it clear that they will seek justice if getting treated unfairly.

And when Han Chinese dare to offend others, they just do. And if themselves get scared, they just surrender. Fair or not, dignity and honor, it isn’t what they concern.

Dare-or-not, while not the fair-or-not, is one of the Han Chinese behavior principles. And the principle is actually a fear-or-not. So, who should fear because of the other side? That’s what Han Chinese concern first.

This self-confession can be used to explain many Han Chinese phenomena.

To become the object to know the object

How to know human?

We can watch.

We can give a theory to explain what we have observed. And we can test it to see if it is true.

But we can never really know human only by watching.

How to know human, then?

Before we answer this question, we should answer other questions first. How can we communicate? How can we understand each other when we communicate? Why can’t we even understand each other in any case? If these questions can’t be answered, we can’t know how we can know human. And if these questions can be well answered, it gives us clues to find the ways to know human.

Suppose there’s somebody honest who can tell you everything about him/herself without an intended lie, can you know him/her by understanding what he/she tells you?

If we want to fully understand another people, what suppositions we need? We should suppose,

• we can know ourselves,
• different people have the same or similar cognition system, and we can know the same thing if we are under the same conditions,
• we express the same thing in the language which can make the expression disambiguated,
• when we try to understand each other, it means we try to recover the mental state to get the same awareness which has been already existed in our mind, and when we get it, we say we understand. If it doesn’t exist in our mind, we have no chance to understand.
• we have to have something to be recovered to be bewared,
• the same thing being bewared means we have to be under the same conditions, and means we have to get in the same mental or bodily state.

We suppose we know others if the above suppositions met.

It requires the researchers to be able to change their mental state to have the objects’ mental state. It means the researchers should eliminate all of self and build the objects’ self. But how to break our self?

We know we have personalities. It means everybody has their comparatively stable state of self. But we also know the personality can be changed and usually we can experience strong feelings during the process of changing. And usually we don’t like those feelings. It means if we want to change our self, we have to be brave enough to bear the uncomfortable feelings to change our self. There’s a fact that children can’t be that calm if they lose the chance to have what they like but most of adults can be calm or calmer than children when they lose what they like. It isn’t because how long they have lived, but because of the feelings caused by gain or loss they have experienced and the state of balance of the feelings. That makes them different when they want to free their mental state from restriction by psychological forces. Those, who had ever lost any hope in their lives, probably depressed to death, can have the ability to free their mental state and adjust it to the possible state they want to be in. And if the state is exactly the one their objects are in, they can, probably, know their objects. It is the furthest extent how we can know others.

(Are you still so sure your comment is true when you judge others?)

Consistently arrogant

Sometimes, Han Chinese are consistent. For example,

They tend to be arrogant rude. But if their arrogance or rudeness gets rejected, they would arrogantly rebuke you, “You should tolerate!”

Tolerate what?

Tolerate their arrogance and rudeness.

How do they demand?

Arrogantly.

Their arrogance and rudeness is really consistent all the time.

Han Chinese, religion, and science

Religion has the theory (it is called faith) which can’t be false even if the facts disprove it.

Han Chinese can’t be wrong whatever the facts are, because Han Chinese want to be the superior. They think if they have to yield to the facts, it means they become the inferior.

Science has no theory which can be true without checking the facts. On the contrary, Facts can never be wrong. Facts just exist or occur conditionally. Even if the facts are not good for us, we just rethink what we should pursue and how to get it. But it doesn’t mean we can deny the facts. And the facts-conditions is out of our wills’ control. It means we can’t win if our wills are against the facts. But we can control the factors if we can know and take advantage of the conditions for the facts to occur. And it is the most powerful way for human to become really superior. And it is the reason why we human are superior to all of the other species in the universe.

Sometimes, our pursuit, attitude or faith really works. But if we don’t make them go well with the science (facts), it just can’t make us really more powerful or more superior in the reality. And it is just the fact when Han Chinese has the faith of we-must-be-the-superior-whatever-the-facts-are.

“You Han Chinese have been conquered and ruled twice!”

In a university.

One of my classmates arrogantly despised other ethnic groups. He is Han Chinese. He was just proud of Han Chinese and thought Han Chinese superior to others.

Another classmate despised back, “You Han Chinese have been conquered and ruled twice!” He is of Manchu ethnicity.

It shocked me.

In my life, nobody had told me we got conquered or ruled. I only knew “the Mongol rulers” or “the Manchu rulers”. But how could they become our rulers? How could we, the Han Chinese, become ruled by them? Nobody had told me the reasons. Nobody had asked those questions. Nobody had even used the word of ruled. They just used the word of ruler.

At that time, I was still proud of my Han Chinese ethnicity. But the pride got shaken and got shadowed.

Han Chinese, the “bigoted”, the “racists”

When I worked for Han Chinese bosses in exporting business, they all talked about the risk in business. The risk is not because of the market change out of estimation, but because of whom we dealt with. (The companies I worked for are small businesses.)

When we met prospective customers, the Han Chinese bosses asked the first question was what ethnicity these possible customers were of.

If we said “the westerners from Western Europe, or North America, or Australia, or Japanese”, the bosses would say, “Learn more about them. If they are really the people you said, and if they don’t work with other people, you can try to develop relationship with them. And be careful at the beginning.”

If we said “westerners from Latin America or Eastern Europe”, the bosses would not trust them that much.

If we said “Arabs from Middle East”, the bosses would have hard choice. They knew probably they could have lots of business chances, but the risk was higher.

If we said “Africans”, or “South Asians”, or “South Eastern Asians”, or “Koreans”, the bosses would shake their heads, “Too many scammers!”

If we said “Chinese”, the bosses would say, “Swindlers? How can you get to know them? How long have you known them? Have you done business with them before? If they want to do business with us, it is OK only if they pay the deposit and payment is before the shipment.”

————–

If Han Chinese want to fight against those bigoted, those racists, are themselves the bigoted, or the racists? If not, do they insult themselves?

the victim comfort men and the victim comfort women

Han Chinese were victims. They have been saying that.

They were the victims of “the dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters (狗日的小日本鬼子 gou ri de xiao ri ben gui zi) “, and the victims of “western bandits ( 西方强盗 xi fang qiang dao)”. The “western bandits” defeated their Manchu masters and looted them. “The dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters” defeated their Manchu msters, Russian colonists, and later Han Chinese, and looted china, and recuited huge number of comfort men (colabournists, 伪军 wei jun) and comfort women.

They were the victims.

But when I lived with Han Chinese, I found that if you don’t attack, if you are not arrogant, Han Chinese will suppose you are bad, or suppose you should be the inferior, and they think they should violently cruelly conqueror you to stop your supposed evil or your supposed inferiority, if you don’t surrender, you will get cruelly tortured. (And if you violently resist to their attack, they don’t fight bravely. They just become the victims.)

They are arrogant superior rude masters and rulers of the world.

But they have been saying there were the victims.

They were the victims.

They were the victims!

They were the victims?

Victims???

How can they be?!

It always puzzles me a lot when I put those facts together. And it always shocks me when I see they treat me or others that arrogantly, rudely, viciously, violently and cruelly and they say they were the victims.

The victim comfort men or the victim comfort women?

The victims?

The worst offenders, actually?

Truth hater

Han Chinese must be truth haters, or else, they can’t be the typical Han Chinese.

If people accept the truth unconditionally, people can’t reject the truth because of the relationship they are in. But Han Chinese are in the relationship between the superior and the inferior, they have to choose to act because of the truth or because of the demanding from the superior. And if they accept the truth when the truth is contradictory to the demanding, it means there’s no ranking difference, and they are equal because of the acceptance of the truth. But Han Chinese just can’t accept no ranking difference between them. And they simply expel the truth out of their life. And they hate the truth.

Right/Wrong Or Superior/Inferior

1
When I offered evidence to prove somebody morally wrong, he didn’t told me that there were flaws in my proof. He didn’t ask me to offer more evidences, or offered his evidences to prove himself not wrong, but despised me, “Young man!” (In his mind, a young man = poorly qualified = the inferior. And it is why I made the “mistake” to make the “wrong” statement against him. And it proves himself not wrong. And that’s the way he proved himself right.)
2
I had ever published posts on Chinese forum to prove “Han Chinese traditional beautiful moral values” evil. Another forum user came and left a reply, “Are you a calf?” He didn’t offer any evidence to prove my statement false. (In his mind, a calf = ignorance, rash, impoliteness and the inferior. He proved my point of views wrong by proving me the inferior.)
3
After I got offended, I told my offender what wrongness he had done. He commanded me, “Don’t be angry! Don’t be angry!” (Why did I tell him he was wrong? He thought it was because I was angry. And he thought he had the power to restrict my emotional state. And after he arrogantly restricted me, I would not think him wrong, and he was not wrong.)
4
An old woman wanted to talk to me. But she acted like an arrogant master. I told her I didn’t want to talk to the rude people. She rebuked, “Was I rude?! You should know what’s forgiveness!” (She thought if she could restrict me like a master or governor, it must be my wrongness to blame her. What I did wrongly was that I was not well restricted by her. If I was well restricted, I would not blame her, and she would not be wrong.)
5
When some Han Chinese culture-traitors publish posts on forum to blast Han Chinese history and culture, they get rebuked, “Are you the descendants of Yanhuang (炎黄 yan huang)?” (If yes, you have NO right to seek truth. Then Han Chinese history or culture can not be attacked. Then there’s nothing wrong with Han Chinese history or culture, but superiority.)
…
(Too many examples! The number of the examples must be hundreds of times larger than Han Chinese population, because it is Han Chinese itself. It is the reason why they are Han Chinese. They do that everyday!)

—————–
All of the mature Han Chinese know that and themselves act in that way.
(You show me the evidence to prove me wrong? I show you my arrogance to prove you the inferior and arrogantly treat you as the inferior or assign obligations to you. Then, can I, the superior, still be wrong?
It is why Han Chinese aren’t wrong. They act in that way, whomever they are in conflict with.)

In a Han Chinese mind, you can be morally wrong because of their moral standard, but themselves can never be morally wrong, they use the relationship between the superior and the inferior to respond to your condemnation or your evidence.

How to seek truth with Han Chinese, then?
I strongly recommend a cockroach for you to seek truth with, while not Han Chinese!!!

Han Chinese don’t tell lies all the time!

Can I say Han Chinese tell lies all the time?
No, I can’t. It isn’t true. For example, Han Chinese say they can tell truth after getting drunk (酒后吐真言 jiu hou tu zhen yan).
But, what would they tell when they aren’t drunk? Just tell lies?
Why don’t they say that they can tell truth when they aren’t drunk?

How different are they, Han Chinese and cancer cells?

Human needs the right values to live.
Cancer cells need a living body to live.
But Han Chinese have values that are backwards. And cancer cells destroy the living body.
When cancer cells kill the body, cancer cells kill themselves, too.
When Han Chinese destroy the right values, what kind of life can themselves live?

How different are they, Han Chinese and cancer cells?

—————–
If human wants to pursue a better life, it is conditional.
When Han Chinese pursue a better life under the conditions causing the worse life, they can only get the opposite result.
Han Chinese even pursue the better life under the conditions causing the worse one.

Anti-Japanese and anti-communist-regime

When Han Chinese act against something or somebody they define bad, would they make progress?

The Han Chinese patriots, those anti-Japanese patriots, would they make china better? How do themselves behave, then?

The anti-communist-regime dissidents or victims, would they make china better? How do themselves behave, then?

None of them examines themselves when they act against something or somebody. On that point, they are the same. They can’t make progress.

Seek truth? Narrow minded! Seek justice? Intolerant!

If you can’t make others scared, and if you want to seek truth and justice after you got offended, you would get blamed. Seek truth? Narrow minded! Seek justice? Intolerant!

What is the broadminded, then? Whatever the “truth” your offender or the people who intervene are telling, you just accept.

What is the tolerant, then? However they treat you and however they think about the treatment, you just accept without the slightest complain.

That’s the Han Chinese truth and Han Chinese justice.

Happiness and hatred because of my success

It is not easy for mainland Chinese to go to college. And if you don’t have beijing citizenship or shanghai citizenship, it become harder.

When my scores were higher than some universities’ lowest passing scores for the province where I was born, I had a chance to go to that university. But my happiness only lasted for minutes. My family was happy, because they got told that they had good fortunes. And my relatives were happy, because they got told that they might have good fortunes, too. Probably they could have their fate changed one day because of my success. It made me not be able to be happy. I felt the burden on my shoulders. And most of others were not happy. Some of them even hated. One of them said, “How can a bamboo shoot come out of the grass?!” When I visited one of my primary school teachers, he was not happy either. He coldly responded to my message, “We have a neighbor’s son going to the same university. And another neighbor has a son going to the best university.” He just let me know he thought it’s nothing that I went to a university. And some others just talked behind me, “So many students are in the universities!” “I have heard that he can do nothing but reading the books.” At that time, I didn’t know what they were worried about. Today, I know why they were not happy. They were worried if I would be superior to them because I went to the college. They were worried and hated. And they despised me. They just wanted to let me know I was still the inferior, or at least I shouldn’t be superior to them. It couldn’t change my ranking to go to college. (But, did I think I was superior to them?)

Later, I made friends with some westerners. One of them, a young woman, had a problem. After she partly solved the problem and became happy, other westerners were joyful. They said, “Let’s be happy just like our daughter has her problem gone and we are happy like her parents.” I got shocked. They couldn’t know that. The shock happened deep inside my soul secretly. Let’s be happy because she became happy? Why weren’t they worried that she would be superior to them because she became happy? (The answer lies in the relationship between westerners.)

And it made me clearly know why Han Chinese hate others that much when others made success, and why sometimes Han Chinese have to be modest. Almost all of those “ignorantly” proud Han Chinese would get taught lessons to know they can only be happy secretly, or being happy inside and showing others their sorrow on their faces, just make others know they are not the superior. Or else, other Han Chinese would make them unhappy to make them inferior. (The partial Han Chinese relationship makes Han Chinese virulent and makes them not be able to be natural.)

Han Chinese just can’t be happy for you because you are happy.

——————–

( Because Han Chinese relationship is between the superior and the inferior, there are also a condition for them to be kind to others, to love others, to help others, to say sweet words to others, or to say they are in the sweet relationship with others. The condition is that others must show their inferiority first.)

The conversation between the superior and the inferior

When I was in an internet chatroom, a woman took the initiative to talk to me.

There’s no greeting. She asked me about my age, job, salary … like a policewoman.

I told her she was rude.

She rebuked me that she was not rude and I should know what forgiveness was, and she said, “I hope you would not treat the people around you in the same way!” (the bad way)

The woman thought I was young because I was not arrogant. And she thought it was why she could be arrogant rude. But she needed forgiveness, and she rebuked me after the forgiveness requirement, and educated me how I should treat others.

That’s just typical Han Chinese.

And, that’s the conversation between the supposed superior and the supposed inferior. And the supposed inferior was treated really as the inferior. Han Chinese relationship between the internet users is between the superior and the inferior, too, just like the offline relationship.

The excuse to accept the unfairness and humiliating

Why do you fight after your rights got violated if you are not thought the superior?

Han Chinese think it is because you don’t have an excuse to accept the unfairness, loss, or humiliating, or an excuse to avoid being thought the inferior (因为没有个台阶下，担心被别人看不起，所以你需要有个台阶，好在接受了别人的欺侮后还能够不被别人看不起). They don’t think you need justice, but an excuse. So they don’t help you to seek justice, but give you an excuse, the excuse to accept the loss and humiliating. So, Han Chinese have their Han Chinese way to solve the problem. Instead of seeking the justice, they will try to help you smartly find an excuse for you to accept the unfairness and the humiliating. When it is done, Han Chinese think problem is solved. They don’t think you have any reason to fight any more.

Can you seek justice, while not such an excuse, after your rights got violated? Sorry, Han Chinese can’t understand what you are asking at all.

—————-

Instead of thinking it insulting or offensive, I’d rather think if you flatter Han Chinese when you call them chinapig, because did any pig need an excuse to be happily slaughtered?

—————

Instead of seeking their own reasons for the Mongol and Manchu conquests, Han Chinese have been seeking excuses to avoid being thought the inferior.

Warning! I would think you the inferior and treat you as the inferior!

I posted threads (in Han Chinese) to point out the evil of Confucianism on an internet forum in China.

A man replied to my threads.

He asked me how old I was, and whether I was a calf or not. (A calf in Han Chinese means ignorant, inexperience, immature, reckless, and sometimes means rude.)

When I answered his reply to ask him to check the conditions of my statement before he made his comment. He seemed happy at his “successful” comment and said, “Do you think you got thought the inferior and got treated as the inferior? (你是不是感觉很没面子呢？)” And he warned me, “If you attack Confucianism, I will think you the inferior and treat you as the inferior further more!”

Confucians have been arrogant, rude, offensive, and humiliating. It is why Confucianism is true. It is why Confucianism can’t be wrong. And they don’t think their arrogance rudeness is their fault, but their pride, and at the same time it is why others are wrong.

Rebuking

I posted a thread (in Han Chinese) about politics on an internet forum in china.

Another forum user made a comment. (She labeled herself the member of Chinese Democracy Movement.)

She acted like the superior and rebuked me, “What do you know about democracy?! What would china be if people accept your idea?!”

I asked her to find the conditions of my statement.

She admitted that she hadn’t read the conditions before the rebuked me. But she rebuked again, “How could I make a true comment without the context?!” (Absolutely! So true! She thought it’s my fault that she made a comment without considering the conditions or without reading the context.)

And she rebuked me one more time, “I really don’t know what china would be if applying your idea!”

————–

So, what did she do?

Just rebuking.

Before she knew she rebuked me wrongly, she rebuked.

When she knew she rebuked me wrongly, she rebuked.

After she knew she rebuked me wrongly, she still rebuked.

I need conditions to make a true statement. But is there any condition for her to rebuke me? No. She just can rebuke me under any condition, arrogantly, like the superior rebukes the inferior unconditionally.

The most unwanted life

If Han Chinese have to live a life looked down on by others, they would live the most unwanted life, because if they live the life of the inferior, their life has to be an inferior one. If their life is an inferior one, they can’t have any dream in their life. And they shouldn’t pursue a better life. And sometimes that means they have no rights but only obligations in their inferior humble life. All of these are because of they are thought the inferior, and the inferior has to live an inferior life to make the superior happy. And the superior can’t tolerate the inferior having a life same as theirs’. The superior Han Chinese think the inferior should, must, has to live a humble life to distinguish between the superior and the inferior. That’s the wish from the superior to the inferior. Sometimes, it is just a glass ceiling, but sometime, it is the reality and the superior is violently intolerant if the inferior livies a good life.

And if Han Chinese can live a life, in which they are the most superior and all of the others are inferior or humble servants, they just live the best life.

————-

That’s also the Han Chinese behavior conduct when they treat others.

the family ruler and the class ruler

When I went to school, I was asked to fill a form. There’s a blank asking me who was my family ruler (家长).

We also had a class ruler (班长) in schools. And the class ruler is a decision maker if there’s any plan for the class, he/she acts absolutely like a ruler.

Such “superior” people! Democracy?

The Mother In Law And The Daughter In Law

A Han Chinese mother in law
is a master,who can treat her daughter in law as a slave,
is a governor, who can make laws to restrict her daughter in law,
is the superior, who can never been blamed by her daughter in law.

And at the same time, a daughter in law
is a slave of her mother in law,
is ruled by her mother in law,
is the inferior, is nothing, who has no any right.

And Han Chinese know what the daughter in law should do. She should endure such a life, and wait, until she has a chance to become the mother in law of her own son’s wife, and to treat her daughter in law like a cruel master to release the stress she got from her mother in law.

The relationship between Han Chinese mother in law and daughter in law is the relationship between all of the Han Chinese. And the personality of the daughter in law is the personality of most of Han Chinese. When they got offended, they don’t resist, but look for chances to hurt innocent others.
That evil!

What kind of son-in-law’s are Han Chinese seeking for their daughters?

Han Chinese marriage is largely decided or planned or urged by their parents.

What kind of son-in-law’s are Han Chinese parents seeking for their daughters?

The first condition is that the son-in-law-to-be must recognize his parents-in-law’s superiority and must think he is inferior to them.

The second condition is that the son-in-law-to-be must serve his parents-in-law’s like the inferior serve the superior.

What kind of daughter-in-law’s are Han Chinese parents seeking for their sons?

The same conditions for the daughter-in-law-to-be.

Why had Han Chinese got conquered twice and got ruled for 356 years?

It is because those conquerors were beast! It is because those conquerors were inferior to us Han Chinese.

Since 1279 when Mongols conquered the entire Han Chinese territory, no Han Chinese have seriously sought the reasons for their fall but they all have worked hard to prove themselves superior and the conquerors are inferior beasts.

Han Chinese were conquered and ruled by beasts. So, have they proven themselves the superior sub-beasts?

What an ethnic group! They had been inferior, but they have been arrogant, and can’t learn!

Typical Han Chinese can’t be honest.

Typical Han Chinese live in the relationship between the superior and the inferior.

What moral values do Han Chinese adhere to to restrict their behaviors, then?

The moral values are not because of the facts or fairness, but because of what the ranking difference requires, or because of those that would help Han Chinese to become the superior. Such a way of thinking is different from the requirement of honesty. And it definitely can’t make Han Chinese honest.

And when typical Han Chinese forget or don’t know what natural values are, they think themselves, the distorted self, natural. And the abnormality just make Han Chinese naturally dishonest and against the natural values.

Han Chinese can’t be honest in their partial relationship.

The supremacy of Han Chinese language

If you want to be rude,

If you want to be arrogant,

If you want to offend others,

If you want to humiliate others,

If you want to distort the facts,

If you want to reverse the truth,

If you want to be hypocritical,

If you want to be contradictory,

If you want to be unfair,

If you want to be extremely biased,

I strongly recommend Han Chinese language. It would be the best for you to reach your goals, because the language is designed or developed to fit those purpose.

That’s the Han Chinese language supremacy.

I should be the most inferior.

Since my earliest memory, I have been educated and trained by my parents that I should be the most inferior, inferior to anybody in the world. If any of my attitudes or behaviors did not meet the requirement, I would get “educated” by anybody. That means anybody could rebuke me, teach me, even hit me to let me know I was the most inferior in the world.

And when I got offended, I couldn’t defend. I even had no rights to defend. When I needed somebody to do something for me, even if it was a deal I paid others, I should beg, and the other side could decide if my begging could be considered or not. If it wasn’t considered, I could only give up however important it was for me, because I was the most inferior, how could I think others should put any obligation on themselves because of the relationship between them and me?

I had been in that state through out my early life. And I knew what hell was.

Only when I started to learn laws, politics and wars, and when I started to know democracy, freedom, fairness, justice, dignity and honor, I started to get shocked. It is the beginning for me to know there are rights for everybody and we can defend our rights by seeking justice or honor. And nobody can be fair if they are arrogant in the relationship with others who are the citizens of the same country. And I started to seek the normal way of life and set it my thinking or behavior conduct. But it caused new problems when I worked and lived with Han Chinese. No Han Chinese thought I was normal. No Han Chinese thought I was right. I was in the conflicts with Han Chinese and they just thought I was the problem itself. They could accept an inferior me, but they couldn’t accept me if I wanted a normal and fair relationship.

Han Chinese just need others to be inferior to them to satisfy their personality state.

Behavior-reasoning-system

Everybody has their behavior-reasoning-system. And it is abstract. That means the reasoning system is an “if conditions, then statement” one and for everybody. And interestingly, usually, the behavior-reasoning-process goes unconsciously.

Because of the behavior-reasoning-system, usually a coward is also a bully, and a bully is also a coward. It is just the phenomenon we can observe or experience in our lives.

Comparing the bully-coward-reasoning-system with the rights/obligations-fairness-reasoning-system,

In a bully-coward-reasoning-system, anybody can be a bully because they are stronger than others, and when they see others are stronger than them, they think it reasonably for others to be the bully and themselves should yield.

In a rights/obligations-fairness-reasoning-system, nobody think they should surrender because others are stronger, and themselves won’t offend others because themselves are stronger. But they will ask for justice if their rights got violated and they will give others fairness if they realize that themselves offended others.

So, we definitely can’t think those people good, who surrender to the evil, because when they can make others surrender, they think they can be evil. It is reasonable for them.

Those who can accept the evil treatment by others, they will treat others evilly. They have the same reason for what they can accept and what they will give.

Good people should be honest and intolerant to the evil, and should accept justice.

Encourage the offender, and discourage the victim

After the highest level power struggle is done (new emperor got recognized), Han Chinese have the value of encouraging the offender and discouraging the victim to keep the peace under the realm.

If the victim resists or seeks justice, more pressure to the victim than to the attacker. The resisting or justice-seeking victim would get blamed because he/she is “serious, narrow-minded, intolerant, not like a great man/woman, inferior, virulent, slandering, incriminating, a trouble maker, a peace destroyer, making the society politically unstable, or blaming others after offending others”. And the victim would get told, “Surrender! If you don’t give up, if you insist on asking for punishing the offender, we will punish you.” “You and the offender will get punished equally (both getting beaten 50 hits).” “If you don’t give up, we will convict you are the offender and punish you!” “If you mention it again, you are the offender and punish you alone!” “Are you the victim? Others said that you were the offender!”

Or the victim would get fooled, “Give up seeking justice, because the offender is your working colleague/your neighbor/living in the same place with you/your classmate/you can see each other everyday/you know each other/you both are Chinese! … And because you will get benefited in the future when the offender gives you something/some chance/… (you just pay the price of getting offended to getting  benefited by the offender in the future).”

And Han Chinese have been practicing it for thousands of years.

But the side-effect of the peace-without-justice/truth is proven vital to this group.

• People don’t fight for honor when they get invaded because the resistance has been discouraged but surrendering has been encouraged and trained.
• Justice or truth has nowhere to be sought.
• Nobody knows what justice or truth should be because the value of peace-without-justice/truth and the practice has confused them.
• The Han Chinese personality is not honest-with-dignity-and-honor, but goes to the opposite.
• The reasoning system in their minds is not rights/obligations, dignity or honor, fair or not, just or not, normal/proper or not, but taking advantage of the value to offend and use this moral value to support the offending and oppress the victim.
• It destroys Han Chinese moral values. Han Chinese moral state and quality has been going down.

Han Chinese is an ethnic group which is morally upside down.

Human rights to the anti-human group

No fair side can be sought among Han Chinese, including in the conflicts between communists regime and Falun Gong.

Falun Gong have sentenced many communist officers to death in the name of the Gods just because they said those “criminals” had the Gods shocked.

If I had to live under a Falun Gong regime, what life could I live?

Really, I want to live a life because I am a living thing. I look for food to eat because my body needs it, while not because of any reason else. I want to go to the beach to have a sun-bath simply because I want to enjoy the sun, while not because of any reason else. I don’t want to live a life because the Gods demand me to do this or to do that for them. Unlike the life under the debated, publicly issued, and clearly explained laws, I really don’t know what the Gods need under the Gods’ rule. And I really don’t know how to avoid making the Gods unhappy or shocked. I don’t want to get sentenced to death because I made the Gods unhappy or shocked.

If I should get tried and sentenced, I would rather get tried by a tribunal and sentenced by judges by citing both the laws and my crimes, and the judges and tribunal are appointed by the government, and I can have a lawyer to defend, and the laws are made by law-makers who are elected by people, and I would rather get executed by  the government which is elected by the people. And my death sentence is because of justice, while not because of the shocked Gods. And the justice is sought because of the requirement of the normal relationship between me and others.

I really don’t want to get tried by some people in the name of the Gods. And I committed crime is not because I had the Gods unhappy or shocked.

I want to live my life, while not the life ordered by the Gods.

I want to get ruled by the authority which is elected by people, including my vote, while not the Gods, who I have never seen, or never talked to. And I have never known what the Gods have been thinking, never known what the Gods would order me to do. I don’t want to be ruled by the Gods, mastered by the Gods, or owned by the Gods. My life is mine. I live because I have my life, not because I should serve the terrible bossy master Gods.

In Falun Gong members’ or practitioners’ minds, human’s only position is the servant of the Gods, while not for human itself. And the “no-human” group claimed their “human rights” and their requirement got supported by the UN.

When the Gods have all the rights and power, and only the oppressed servant position for human, where would the human rights be?

If we suppose the communist officers are just “the Gods”, what’s the difference between “the communist Gods” and Falun Gong’s “the Gods”? If the communist regime acts against human, doesn’t Falun Gong (in the name of the Gods)?

Human rights to the anti-human group?

—————–

One of the reasons why Falun Gong needs the Gods is that they are not powerful enough to win the fighting against their enemy largely in power struggle, but can only seek the terrorist master Gods to terrify their enemy and satisfy their disappointment and satisfy their hatred, while not seeking the justice.

But, is it a human-favor group?

—————–

I have other questions,

Since the Gods create anything and rule the world, can’t they even give their human-servants human rights or guarantee the human rights? Why did Falun Gong ask United Nations to support their Human rights because they are the Gods believers?

I am afriad that what Falun Gong really wants to have is the Gods’ rights. But why do they need United Nations to support their Gods’ rights? The Gods can’t even give or protect their own Gods’ rights?

How false is it if I say what Falun Gong has been doing is to scam people and use the Gods as the tool to oppress others?

“Abnormal”

A frequently used word by Han Chinese is “abnormal”.

What are described abnormal by Han Chinese?

• those who behave different from Han Chinese
• those who have different ideas from Han Chinese’s
• those who adhere to different values from Han Chinese’s
• anything newly created or introduced

When Han Chinese see others different from themselves, they don’t consider others’ rights/obligations, or fairness, or possible making progress, or politeness. They don’t consider if others behave naturally either. What they think is that Han Chinese are normality itself. And more exactly, those Han Chinese, who are in the higher ranks, are normality itself.

But how normal are Han Chinese themselves?

Beautiful lies or kind lies

Is it fair to tell lies to fool others (except fooling enemy in wars)?

But Han Chinese think it either necessary or beautiful/kind to tell lies, because

• you can’t do anything great if you don’t tell any lie (不撒谎就做不了大事).
• I don’t want to make you unhappy if I let you know the truth (美丽的谎言，善意的谎言).

Then, why not telling lies to become great or beautiful? Why should telling lies be evil when we have good reasons to tell lies?

That’s just the Han Chinese phenomenon.

Han Chinese antonym: their words and the truth

There’s a Han Chinese phenomenon,

If you use the words, which Han Chinese use to attack others, to describe Han Chinese themselves, or if you use the words, which Han Chinese use to praise themselves, to describe those who got blamed by Han Chinese, you would find it closer to the truth.

That’s Han Chinese antonym.

The intolerant asks others to tolerate

Where: china

When: 21st century

Story 1

I don’t like arrogant rude people.

A teacher knew that. And she arrogantly rebuked me, “In my past life, so many people attacked my family. My father almost got incriminated to get jailed. And so many people attacked me. We just tolerated them. And today, those attackers pay respect to us. You should treat others like us. Tolerate the attackers! Heard? Remember?”

But, simply, she couldn’t tolerate me. What I did is refusing to associate with those arrogant rude people. I got no tolerance.

Story 2

A young woman liked me.

She asked me to visit her parents. If her parents agreed, she thought we should get married. And she told me I should be a tolerant person. That’s her requirement. I shouldn’t restrict her, or blame her if she did anything wrong. She also told me that her father was identified as a class enemy in the past. Her parents lost everything but lives. But her parents tolerated their attackers and now they lived happily.

I told her that I didn’t think her parents honest, though they were the victim of evil. Her parents didn’t distinguish between tolerating others and pursuing justice and truth.

She got angered and we just broke up.

She asked for tolerance, but she could tolerate nothing!

People use tolerance to restrict others. But there’s no tolerance if the requirement of tolerance gets rejected. It isn’t  because others don’t tolerate, but because themselves can’t tolerate, extremely intolerant.

————

I can tell the number 100 story about tolerance. But all of the stories tell the same truth that tolerance can’t be one-sided restriction or another word of dishonesty, or cowardice. Without these conditions, tolerance just becomes hypocrisy. And the so called tolerance just contributes to a worse world, because it causes less restriction to the evil.

The fact-set and the theory-set

The fact-set is the set of independent facts, phenomena, testing results, affections, …, anything existing conditionally despite we believe or not, which can be observed, experienced, tested, …

And the theory-set is the set of theories, which are made to explain some fact-set.

Then, the more facts in the fact-set, the fewer theories can be in the theory-set. And vice versa.

Any theory-making should reach the goal of having the unique theory for a complete fact-set.

But just as we all can see, we can never guarantee any fact-set is a complete one. It means we can never have a final theory for any object. Any theory can only be true under the condition of the related fact-set.

============

Remark,

It is one of the most powerful research method to seeking the conditions for any fact’s existence.

Because I think you are the inferior

Where: beijing
When: 21st century

I needed a telephone.
I went to a market.
When I stayed at a telephone shelf, a salesclerk came to me to introduce the products. He strongly recommended some brand in his beijing native accent. It looked nice. I bought it and asked him to give me the guaranty for repairing. He told me no need, I could go back to him if there’s anything wrong with the telephone.
Several days later, there’s something wrong with the telephone and it could not work.
I went to that market again with that telephone.
I found that salesclerk and told him what had happened.
He said nothing as if he didn’t hear.
I repeated.
“What’s wrong?!” He roared, “Wait for a while!”
“It doesn’t work!” I got angry and shouted back.
“Why did you yell so loudly?!” He shouted.
He roared first and yelled more loudly. But he rebuked me.
I angrily waited for him to handle my telephone problem.
When nobody there asked him for service, he came to me and checked the telephone, “What’s wrong with it? It looks very good. Nothing wrong.”
I told him it didn’t work, and asked him to test it.
He reluctantly went to a telephone line and connected it.
The telephone didn’t work. But he still said, “What’s wrong with it? Nothing wrong!”
I got astonished. He could even say something opposite to the truth in front of him!
I asked him whether there’s anything he could see or hear. After I repeatedly asked him that question, he accepted the return and would give me a new one.
He checked the telephone to see whether there’s any damage by me. Suddenly he cried, “Ah! There’s a fissure! You damaged it! Ah! A fissure!” He yelled. He called the natural fissure by product assembling a damage.
I asked him to look carefully.
“Ah! A fissure! Ah! So long a fissure!” He yelled more loudly. “No, you cannot return it. You damaged it by yourself. You can only have it repaired. Go to the repairing department.”
He gave the telephone back to me.
I saw him stood there as if it was none of his business.
Then, I asked him to tell me the repairing department’s telephone number and made a call. The person answering my call told me I had to send the telephone to their department, which was about 20 km away, and told me to show them the repairing guaranty, which the salesclerk refused to give me. When I asked whether I could had it repaired in the market where I bought the telephone, he said no, and told me they had the company rules and nobody could break the rules.
…

———

Remarks,

Why did that salesclerk treat me in that way? If I was a beijing native, would he treat me in the same way?

The only reason for him to treat me in that way is because I was not a beijing native, and he thought me the inferior. So, he could fool me, cheat me, shout at me, rebuke me, blame me, and he did nothing wrong whatever the facts were, but I did everything wrong whatever the facts were. Because he thought me the inferior, he thought me wrong and I must be wrong, he thought himself right and he must be right. Because he thought me the inferior,  he could judge and rule me after failing to fulfill his obligation. But, who is the inferior really? Why do Han Chinese act opposite to the image they think they should be?

The arrogant, rude, vicious victims

My experience tells me that,

Han Chinese are the most arrogant in the world if they don’t get scared.

They are rude violent if they don’t get scared.

They are as vicious as beasts if they don’t get scared.

They are the Gods and they want to make the world become whatever they want if they don’t get scared.

They want to make others scared and make others think them (those Han Chinese) the most superior all the time.

But, meanwhile, they have been telling the stories that they were the victims. Comfort women, for example, comfort men (collaboration army), and those killed in Sino-Japanese war all were the victims. And the time hasn’t been able to change Han Chinese attitudes or behaviors.

So, Han Chinese are the arrogant, rude, vicious victims.

Han Chinese Great Men

How to become a Han Chinese great man?

Han Chinese definition of a great man:
Those, who can surrender and offend, are great men.(大丈夫能屈能伸)
When should a great man surrender? When he thinks his opponent more like an offender, because his opponent is more vicious, more reckless, attacking more fiercely, more powerful, or crueler …
When should a great man offend? When he thinks himself more like an offender, because his opponent is kind, friendly, considerate, gentle, fair, or at least seems not as rude violent as himself.

How to define the men, who don’t offend, nor surrender, i.e. live with dignity and honor?
Sorry, there’s no Han Chinese definition for them, because no Han Chinese do that way in their superior long history.

————–
(It is their confession to tell the world who Han Chinese are.)