Live examples! Han Chinese disagree with me. But they prove my statements true with the way they disagree.

I got this comment by Han Chinese.

Comment	Date	Actions
	Superior Han Chinese fuckyou@superior.com | 121.120.111.94 Dear Inferior race, Han Chinese are not evil. They are just proud of themselves. Many non-Han Chinese or other races envy or jealous about the success of Han Chinese. The same “jealousy” from German/Arabs toward Jews. Because Han Chinese have: 1) higher intelligence (ranking 2nd in the world, after Ashkenazi Jews) 2) 5000 years of civilization 3) greatest culture 4) great food 5) Great economic power 6) Great military power From, Superior Han Chinese From When I think Han Chinese normal human, I hurt myself., 2008/11/30 at 4:42 AM

=====================

Remark:

Up till now, it is the first time for me to have such a unique Han Chinese comment. He/she offered “evidences” to prove his/her statements. The way is very rarely to be seen. But he/she still just proved my statements true. They think themselves are superior, but they couldn’t defend themselves. And it is why they think they can offend others (Because they think themselves are superior). They don’t know that arrogance, or rudeness, or unfairness, or lies is not superiority, but hurt themselves each other and hurt outsiders. Totally evil cancer cells.
.

The arrogant hypocrites

Usually, what would people do after they did something wrong?

Got guilt? Upset? Confess? Or cover what they did? Never admit what they did?

All are possible.

And Han Chinese would do more.

Han Chinese would be arrogant after they did something wrong if they don’t fear others. And they would act as if they were in charge of the truth. They would let you know what the “truth” is like the judges. And they would arrogantly rudely rebuke you, blame you, or even punish you violent.

So, when you see Han Chinese arrogantly rebuke you or blame you on offending them after they offended you, you should know that Han Chinese trait. They are arrogant virulent hypocrites. What Han Chinese want to do is to deceive you or fool you to control your mind to morally arrogantly offend you.

Smart? Or extremely evil?

“Don’t fear! I am not a bad woman.”

Location: China

Date: 21st century

One day, when I was sitting in a crowded hall waiting for a bus, an old woman approached me. After watching her behavior and some gesture, I guessed she wanted to fool me. Soon she sat down next to my seat. She looked upset. Then she leaned over to me and arrogantly rudely ordered me to tell her the departure time of some bus. I answered with my suspecting eyes. Seconds later, she blamed me in a low voice “Don’t fear! Don’t fear! I am not a bad woman.” I angrily told her that I was not the staff of the bus station, and she should have asked the working staff to know the departure time. A working staff was standing 2 meters away from her. She saw that moment I was not as foolish as she estimated. Then she moved her body and swung on her seat. Minutes later, she left the seat without asking the working staff about the departure time.

————–

Questions,

Why did the old woman treat me so arrogantly rudely because of the age difference?

Why did they do something bad in an arrogant way? Arrogantly order you, rebuke you, educate you to fool you to offend you? (It is related to Han Chinese traditional beautiful moral value of “to admire the old and surrender to the old to serve the old”.)

Why did she suppose I feared her when I suspected her? Why did she understand my refusal as fear? (She thought Han Chinese must fear the rude vicious offender and surrender to the offender. And she thought I must be the same.)

Why did she fool others in an arrogant way?

Why did she give up after getting angrily responded to?

Why did she have no shame after it was apparent that she told a lie (that she wanted to know the departure time.)? She looked just as usual.

The arrogant rude dishonest coward Han Chinese!

Why do I attack you? It is because you are bad.

When Han Chinese attack, they don’t need facts, truth, consistence, or fairness. They attack only because “I am not happy with you.” And when their attack proves themselves responsible, and if the problem has nothing to do with the blamed, they have another reason to attack you, “why I attack you, it is because you are bad, and it is also why you are bad. If you are not bad, would I attack you?!”  “No fly stays on the unbroken eggs. (苍蝇不叮无缝的蛋 ) (If you got blamed, you must be bad.)”

You are angry? It is because you think about it!

Why are you angry after you got offended? Han Chinese think it is because you think about it. So, it isn’t the offender’s problem. It is the victim’s problem. So, the victim should blame him/herself because he/she thinks about the offense. If the victim forgets it, he/she should not be angry after getting offended.

But if themselves are angry, it must be because of you. Because they think of you when they are angry. It is why you should be blamed.

Han Chinese dishonesty

There are dishonest people in every ethnic group. Is it necessary to discuss Han Chinese dishonesty as a special one?

Han Chinese is a special group. Their dishonesty is also special.

Usually, if people of other ethnic groups commit crime, they don’t redefine the value of what they did. If they did something wrong and if they got caught, they probably refuse to admit their wrongdoing, but they don’t change the values. But Han Chinese are different. If Han Chinese did something wrong, not only do they refuse to admit their wrongdoing, but also try their best to redefine the value of what they did. And in the end, they let you know what they did is not wrong at all, probably it is right, good, and helpful. You can’t blame them or punish them. On the contrary, you should appreciate them and better reward them. If you are in the conflict with them, they redefine the value of what you did. Simply, what you did is wrong. You should get punished. Sometimes, themselves did what you did. How can Han Chinese do in that case? It is not a problem at all. Han Chinese can define the behavior bad if you did, and they can define it good if themselves did. Logic? Yes, that’s Han Chinese logic. And that is so natural and Han Chinese are so proud of it, because they think themselves so smart.

If you get confused about values, what’s wrong and what’s right? Han Chinese educate you that you are wrong because it is you, and themselves are right because it is themselves. What’s helpful and what’s harmful? Han Chinese also educate you that what you did is harmful because it is you, and what themselves did is helpful because it is themselves.

—————

Dear readers, do you still think all human are the same because they are categorized into human?

How do Han Chinese behave and how do they understand others’ behaviors?

Where: china
When: 21st century

1
When I rode a bike passing by an old man, he got upset. “I am so old! You even  hit me the old?!”

The truth is that I didn’t hit him. He just got upset by the coming bike. But what surprised me is his reason.
I am the older, so, you cannot hit me. If I am the younger, can you hit me? The younger can be hit by the older?  (Han Chinese really think they can treat the younger people in that way.)

2
There was something wrong with my computer monitor. I found some telephone numbers in news paper to contact repairing companies. I called them and made an agreement with one of them on the phone. According to the agreement, I should pay 50 Yuan after it got repaired.
I went to that company with my monitor. After it got repaired, I was told to pay 120 Yuan.
I refused to pay. I reminded him of the agreement. He insisted on asking that price.
“You can’t change the price without negotiating with me. You shouldn’t make a decision on your side alone.”

“So, you want to make a decision on your side alone, don’t you!” shouted the man.
……

He was a typical Han Chinese.
I meant that the price should be changed after the negotiation with each other, or remains the same as the price in agreement. It should not be changed as he wanted.
But he thought, if he couldn’t change it as he wanted (on his side alone), could I change it as I wanted (on my side alone)? There’s just no equality or negotiation in his mind. He thought the price should be changed either on this side alone or on that side alone.

3
I talked to a woman. She told me she was a policewoman. I got badly impressed by Chinese policemen/women. I stopped talking to her. She then said proudly, “Hah, you got scared by me!”

It made me sick to talk to a Chinese policewoman. But she thought it must be because I got frightened by her. (Probably she thought her job was to make people scared.)

4
Someone visited me and left something in my room. I found it later and gave it back. Another one said, “You were afraid that you would get beaten. So you gave it back?”

I thought I should give back something that is not belonging to me. But I got understood because I feared and surrendered. What if I didn’t fear?
And did others have the right to beat me if I didn’t give that back?
Should I fear if I got beaten?
(This example reflects how Han Chinese think about fairness, dignity or honor, and their rights or obligation, and also how Han Chinese behave. Fear or not, while not fair or not, is a Han Chinese behavior conduct.)

5
When I got on a bus, a woman pushed me to make me cede more room to her. I though I had the right to stand there and I had no room to cede and the woman had more room than mine (It was very crowded on that buss). The woman complained all the time. And when she got off, (I was still on the bus) she shouted at me, “That man, you are that arrogant!”

Why did she ask more room when she had already had more room than others? (She thought me selfish because I rejected her selfish demanding.)
Did she think others had the right to stand on a bus without offending? (She thought I behaved unfairly while not herself behaved unfairly.)
Why didn’t she shout at me on the bus? Why did she do after getting off? (Because it was SECURE for her to provoke when I was still on the bus.)
Who’s arrogant? (She thought me arrogant because I rejected her arrogance.)

—————
I don’t think Han Chinese will feel strange when they read the above stories. But we can find out Han Chinese behavior principles and reasoning principles. And how do they understand others’ behaviors or reasons. Han Chinese behavior or reasoning system is different from others’. And they understand others as themselves.

How To Express “Well Respected” In Han Chinese?

In English language, if  some journal is trustworthy, it is called “well respected”. But in Han Chinese language, it is called “from the authority or from the powerful violence”(权威). (You must believe because it is from power or violence. If you don’t believe nor accept, you will get punished by the authority with powerful violence. Are you afraid of it? If yes, accept! And it is why it is the truth. Facts? What’s that? We Han Chinese see facts as nothing.)
If a Han Chinese official is well trusted and his/her policies are well recognized and well accepted, Han Chinese call it “well trusted and well accepted as if it is from powerful violence”(威信).
And if some Han Chinese is called to take some important position to do something important to the public, he/she is “trusted as if he/she is powerfully violent”(威望).

And the language difference really reflects the difference between the two groups of people. And the reality is,

Who is right? The more arrogant, or the ruder, or the more violent Han Chinese are right. Why? Because they can make others afraid of them. And they are more than right. Actually they are the criterion of rightness, because they are more violently arrogant rude.

And Han Chinese are arrogant, rude and violent because they want to be right. And when they behave in that way, they are really “right”, they think themselves are right and other Han Chinese also think them right.

Facts? Truth? Rights? Obligations? Fairness? Those cannot make Han Chinese to pay respect to or accept.
———–

Han Chinese win your respect with power and violence.

Manchu conquest, helpful or harmful?

Manchu conquest, helpful or harmful?

Han Chinese have two answers opposite to each other.

1.

Han Chinese have been blaming Wu Sangui the traitor ( though Li zicheng is the real traitor). —- It seems Han Chinese think Manchu conquest is harmful. Or else, there would be no traitors, nor can they have any reason to blame so called traitors.

2.

Han Chinese are happy to see their territory being expanded to the unprecedentedly extend. —- It seems Han Chinese think Manchu conquest is helpful. (They even proudly claim that their country was the largest in the world in their Yuan dynasty.)

Han Chinese have also been thanking Manchu for their good emperors and their good rule. —- It seems Han Chinese think the Manchu conquest is helpful.

But how can the same thing be helpful and harmful to the same object?

Manchu conquest, helpful or harmful?

=============

And why did Han Chinese get conquered?

Han Chinese also have their “diverse” reasons,

We the great, superior, civilized ethnic group got conquered by Manchu?

• It is because of Wu Sangui the traitor.
• It is because Manchu were beasts, uncivilized, barbarian, cruel, war-liking.
• It is because we pardoned Manchu.
• It is because Manchu emperors and Manchu rule were good to Han Chinese.
• It is because Manchu and Han Chinese were brothers/sisters.
• It is because we were unwilling to kill them.

“How Can I Kill Such A Good Emperor!”

Wei Xiaobao is a very popular movie in china. And Wei Xiaobao is the central figure in that Movie. (Its popularity indicates that the values in that movie are well accepted or well agreed with by many Han Chinese. )
When Wei Xiaobao, the number one in Wushu and probably a “hero”, was asked why he hadn’t killed Manchu ruler, he answered “How can I kill such a good emperor!”
.
Then, why had Han Chinese been conquered? Han Chinese think it is not because Han Chinese got conquered, but because Han Chinese didn’t want to kill their conquerors, and because their conquerors/rulers were so good that Han Chinese were unwilling to kill them. Then the dominant ones were not the conquerors, not the rulers, but the Han Chinese, even though they could not devote a good emperor for themselves.
.
It is the Han Chinese version of explanation of their history.
.
Such a low group! They know nothing about the value of freedom!

Han Chinese Entrepreneurs

Han Chinese entrepreneurs, wherever they are from, have the same instincts.

• They know how to make profits, but they don’t know what fairness is.
• They are arrogant, and they make their business partners know that they are the superior by violating  their partners’ interests.
• They want to be the superior, but they don’t know what honesty is.

I Don’t Think You Are An Important Customer.

Why do Han Chinese fool their customers and arrogantly rudely offend the victims after making their customers lose money in deal?
Because they don’t think the customers are important.

But why don’t they refuse to deal with the unimportant costumers? Why do they fool others to make others lose money and arrogantly rudely despise others after hurting?
Han Chinese with their traditional beautiful moral values?
Or, actually the evil monsters with their traditional beautiful moral values as camouflage?

Beautiful Moral Values And Being Extremely Inconsiderate, Rude, Arrogant, Cruel

Han Chinese show others their beautiful moral values. But they treat those, whom they don’t fear, extremely inconsiderately, rudely, arrogantly, humiliatingly and cruelly.
Why and how can the beautiful moral values and the inhumanity happen to Han Chinese at the same time?
Just because they are  inconsistent ?

———–
It becomes “consistent” if you know that Han Chinese have their partial personalities, and their partial personalities can shit conditionally.

Some Han Chinese Behaviors With Their “Beautiful Moral Values”

Some Han Chinese phenomena,

• I am evil, rude, ignorant, arrogant, and having the values opposite to truth, and moral values are inconsistent with my own attitudes/behaviors. But if you resist to my arrogance and rudeness? You are not civilized! You should be civilized!  (What about myself? I am the civilization itself!)

• I am one-sided, vulgar, inconsiderate and arrogant. But if you do something proper? You’ve done something extremely improper(过分)!

• You complain about the treatment you received? You should tolerate and forgive others! And when I treat you? I punish you for whatever reasons just because I want to hurt you to benefit myself.

• I require you to fight for companies’ interests. But when I pay you, I don’t pay you full salary, because I also have to fight for companies’ interests.

• It is cruel to ourselves if we treat others kindly.

That’s the Han Chinese with their beautiful moral values. Are Han Chinese smart enough?

Are you nervous when you talk to me the boss?

“Are you nervous when you talk to me the boss?”
If Han Chinese bosses don’t think others are in the ranks high enough, many of them want to know if others are nervous when others talk to them. And they treat others arrogantly rudely if they think others in the inferior ranks.
But how can they become bosses?
Usually, Han Chinese bosses all have the record of violating others’ rights in business and most of them are undisciplined in solving business disputes. But they totally forget how they have behaved in business when they pursue to be arrogant. They just enjoy their arrogance and rudeness. And they totally forget their history of comfort women or comfort men when they expect others to tremble because their Han Chinese arrogance.
And how can employees be loyal to their Han Chinese arrogant bosses? To work for mutual benefit or for boss’ arrogance?

To Treat Each Other Politely After Having Enough Food Stock

Han Chinese have their ethical theory.
Why are people polite? One of the Han Chinese reasons is that Han Chinese can treat each other politely after having enough food stock.(仓廪实而知礼节)
What will they do if they have no enough food stock? There’s an answer in their ethical theory to the question. NOBODY IS POLITE in that case.
So, they can offend others reasonably if they have no enough food stock.
But, does their theory really prove Han Chinese morally superior? Or, is it actually the Han Chinese self-confession on their moral state?

(Han Chinese even don’t know moral duties come from relationship, while not from shortage or sufficiency.)

That is the self-described “morally beautiful ethnic group”. And Han Chinese self-confess that this group is actually a theft-group or a robber-group.

“You Are So Selfish!”

“You reject my (selfish) requirement? You are so selfish!”
———–
That’s Han Chinese definition of selfishness.
Han Chinese cannot know what selfishness is in their one-sided psychological state. And it greatly affects Han Chinese  understanding of the social fairness or the social justice. Usually, they are opposite to the truth.

To Go To Han Chinese Restaurants To Eat Ranks

Why do you go to a restaurant?
Usually you go there for food, for nutrition.
But why do Han Chinese go to a restaurant?
They largely go to Han Chinese restaurants (usually in Hong Kong, Guangdong, …) to eat ranks. They sort food in ranks, and give the titles to the food, such as “superior”, “the most superior”, “Wang”, “Ba”, “golden”, or “the most arrogant” …

It makes the food more tasteful for Han Chinese.

Which one is more dangerous, the Han Chinese country or the Han Chinese citizens of your country?

What if Manchu had let Han Chinese stay inside their enclosure to the south of their long fence (great wall)? Would Manchu have got culturally eliminated?

What if Americans hadn’t let Han Chinese flee to Taiwan?

What if more and more Han Chinese settle in Southern Mongolia?

What if more and more Han Chinese settle in Eastern Turkestan?

What if more and more Han Chinese settle in Tibet?

What if more and more Han Chinese live in Russia?

What if more and more Han Chinese live in your country as the citizens of your country?

Han Chinese, as the arrogant culture conquerors with their super powerful reproductive organs and their inherited relationship, are you sure you won’t become another Manchu?

Han Chinese country has never threatened any other ethnic group’s existence in their history as Han Chinese people have done.

You should keep the good relationship with me after you got hurt by me.

Han Chinese hurt you and destroy the relationship. And when you leave them after you got hurt, they would arrogantly blame you, educate you or rebuke you, “You don’t know how to make friends with others!” “You destroyed the relationship with others.” “You must be in the bad relationship with anybody.” “You isolate yourself.” “You don’t know the importance of close relationship with others.” “You can’t live a good life in the future if you can’t be in good relationship with others.” And they would enlighten you, “Don’t you know that someone can smile when others hurt him? He can make friends with anybody however others treated him. Everybody likes him. I have never heard him complaining after I treated him that badly. He will gain great achievements in the future because he can make friends with everybody.”

Han Chinese didn’t destroy the relationship with others after they hurt others. So, in the end, who destroyed the relationship? Han Chinese think those who resisted to the offense or leave the relationship after getting hurt did. Who should take responsibility for the sore relationship? And who should be blamed? Han Chinese have the same answer.

How do Han Chinese comment on themselves as the offenders, then? We are Han Chinese. We are great. Can we do anything wrong?

========

The responsibility for a good relationship is also one-sided. The extremely evil one-sided Han Chinese ethnic group!

You are immoral because I think I can assign moral duties to you.

Why are you thought immoral by Han Chinese?

Because you are really immoral?

No. The only reason for you to be thought immoral by Han Chinese is that you failed to make Han Chinese think you can be superior to them. You are thought immoral only because Han Chinese think they can assign moral duties to you (when they think they can be superior to you), and they think you failed to fulfill the “duties”.

And why do Han Chinese think themselves moral whatever themselves did if they can think you are immoral? The reason is the same. Since you failed to make them think you were the superior, they think you must be the inferior. Then, how can you the inferior assign moral duties to the superior? So, Han Chinese themselves can never be immoral if they can think you immoral. (That’s relativity in morality.) (Usually, Han Chinese children can’t blame their parents whatever their parents did. Han Chinese can’t blame their leaders whatever their leaders did. It is because of the same reasons for them to think somebody immoral or not.)

And it is also why Han Chinese need their ethical system made of contradictions. And they never misuse the contradictory ethical system.

============

Han Chinese moral values = the duties I can assign to you (or the duties you can assign to me) =\= the moral values because of human life itself

Racism and hypocrisy

Human can’t be judged because of their skin color. Individually, it’s true. But different culture groups are really basically different in quality. Those cultures can be inherited generation after generation before memory (before you remember when you started to remember your own name). And when people pay more attention to their own identities, no matter their skin colors are, they will look for something to identify themselves to distinguish themselves from others, and naturally they want to prove themselves superior.  We call it racism. Racism is not only the white people’s property. All kinds of colored people can be racists once they have a chance to proudly identify themselves from others by distinguishing between skin colors or others features like origins.

White people are not more racism at all.

And there’s another question, what about human evolution?

Human evolution means the quality requirement for human becomes higher and higher.

But if some group of people can’t reach the higher standard, can they be categorized low-qualified human group? Racism?

If we don’t distinguish between human rights and human quality, will the human rights become hypocritical and in the end slow down human evolution?

Human dream is self-conditional, if we don’t distinguish between human rights and conditions for human itself-(quality), hypocrites will destroy human dream. History has been proving it.

I can’t agree with racists. But I believe in real human values. And I agree that human are different in quality because of culture, tradition, values, or other factors affecting human quality.

And hypocrites are more dangerous than racists.

Han Chinese sense of arrogance

If you are arrogant, few Han Chinese think you are arrogant. If themselves are arrogant, few of them think themselves are arrogant. But if you are not arrogant and if you resist to others arrogance, Han Chinese think you are so arrogant, because  you can’t yield to others’ arrogance when others think themselves are superior, and because you don’t think you are the inferior, and because others think they should be above you and control you. When others think themselves are the superior, and if you reject their controlling, they hatefully think you are so arrogant.
That’s Han Chinese understanding of arrogance.
Are Han Chinese different from many others?
Han Chinese ethnic group itself is a “distinguished” “outstanding” group.

The worst people

What kind of people do Han Chinese think the worst?
The violent selfish offenders are not the worst. On the contrary, Han Chinese admire them. Usually Han Chinese pay respect to them because they can make others have fear ( 敬畏 Pinyin: jing wei; Translation: pay respect to those who I fear).
The arrogant masters are not the worst. On the contrary, Han Chinese think them are superior because their arrogance and rudeness.
Those who share the same evil characteristics are not the worst. On the contrary, they are the great descendants of the great ancestor of Yan Huang. “We all are great because we share something in common.”
But, those who don’t offend, nor surrender, i.e. who are different from the typical Han Chinese, are the worst, because they failed to accept the offense. (Han Chinese think you must be the inferior since you don’t offend others. And since you are the inferior, others must be superior to you, and you should accept the offense. But you don’t offend nor surrender. It is why Han Chinese think you are the worst , either the morally worst or the most inferior. Simply, Han Chinese can’t accept the “abnormal monsters” who don’t offend nor surrender.)

The title of wife-of-boss

Wife of boss is not a position. But sometimes it is more powerful than the boss.

Han Chinese bosses are emperor of company, no wondering how arrogant they are.
But sometimes, the wives of bosses are more arrogant. And the “wife of boss” becomes a title for those women. When you mention them, you don’t need to say “Ms. XXXX”, but only need to say the “wife of boss”. And they are happy to be called that way.
But why can they be so arrogant rude? Only because they can fuck the arrogant, the bosses?

=============

It’s a critical Han Chinese company feature. And it shows the property of a company. It isn’t a group based on the relationship between people who work together or the relationship between the employer and the employees, but the employees hired by a family. A Han Chinese company is more like an enlarged Han Chinese family.

It’s you who’s wrong!

Where: china
When: 21st century

We were waiting in the line to have some products procedure finished.
A violent arrogantly aggressive wealthy businessman ordered me to cede the chance to him to let him have his products procedure finished first. I had waited ahead him and waited for hours. I refused. He shouted, “Cede or not?!” I said no. He pushed my cart aside crazily and waved his fist to beat me. I didn’t cede and prepared for a fighting. At that time, the factory owner and working staff came surrounding us watching. They did nothing but pulled my cart to another machine and cede my chance to that unbelievably selfish rude arrogant violent businessman. Nobody said any word at the scene.
Minutes later, the wife-of-boss came to me, arrogantly ORDERED  me not to be angry. I told her no. She shouted, “You treated me, the wife-of-boss, that way?! It must be you who’s wrong!” She was that angry and that arrogant. But I remembered she said nothing to that violent “customer”. She was afraid of him, the arrogant violent.

Violence is the only solution to the arrogant rude violent people

Non-violence?

I am the fool who practiced non-violence. And I woke up after the deadly lesson I got taught by the Han Chinese.

Non-violence as a “beautiful” (actually hypocritical) value is conditionally true. It depends on whom you are dealing with. It doesn’t depend on how beautiful your mind is!
Violence is the only solution to the problems caused by the arrogant rude violent one-sided selfish people. You can never seek justice if others think themselves are the superior master and you are the inferior slave and if they believe in violence and if you believe in non-violence, because they don’t think you should have any right at all. To ask them to think about your rights? It’s ridiculous! On the contrary, violence, and the victory with violence, can help you, and only that can help you, seek justice for yourself.

Non-violence can only encourage the evil to be eviler!

Don’t trust hypocrites! They are irresponsible! Hate them! They are much much worse than offenders themselves. And if they yell “Non-violence” after themselves offended others, they are simply extremely hypocritical.

Dear-from-the-same-womb

There are many sickening titles for Han Chinese to fool others. One of them is the famous title of “dear-from-the-same-womb”(亲爱的同胞 Pinyin: qin ai de tong bao. Translation: dear fellow citizens, dear countryman).

Its direct meaning is that you are my brothers/sisters who have the same mom (from the same womb) if I call you  “dear-from-the-same-womb”. (The womb must be a super one because Han Chinese population is more than 1.3 billion, and sometimes mainland Han Chinese call themselves “mom” and call overseas Han Chinese “the lost sons”, that means the moms and sons must be from the same womb. Stunning?)

But Han Chinese don’t only call other Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, but also call people of other ethnic groups “dear-from-the-same-wombs”. Why? They had called Mongols Hulu before. But they call Mongols “dear-from-the-same-wombs” today. They had called Manchu Dalu before. But they call Manchu “dear-from-the-same-wombs” today. They call Taiwanese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”. But they set a condition for the title when they call Taiwanese that only those who are willing to be united with mainland can be called “dear-from-the-same-wombs”. So, it is so clear why and how Han Chinese apply the sickening title. If they want to rule others, others are their “dear-from-the-same-wombs” whatever former relationship between them. If others resist to their intention of ruling, others are not their “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, and others are even their enemies.

The words are so sweet. And the application is so simple.

Why Are Japanese Most Hated By Han Chinese?

Han Chinese as an ethnic group has been invaded by many. Among the many, Mongols and Manchu have become Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, Russian has become Han Chinese “superior brother”, only western countries and Japan remain on Han Chinese enemy list. And Japanese are the most hated by Han Chinese. Why?
Because of Japanese invasion?
Obviously it isn’t a true reason.
Because of the so called Nanking massacre?
I remember that there are Yangzhou massacre and Jiading massacre by Manchu. But Manchu people have become Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”. So, it isn’t a true reason either.

Because of the Japanese cruelty in battle?

I remember that Mongols were also very cruel. But Han Chinese call them “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, too. So, it isn’t a true reason either.
Then, what’s the exact reason for Han Chinese to hate Japanese that much?
There are some clues.
When Japanese invaded china, some Han Chinese cried that Han Chinese had taught Japanese the students, how to write, but today the students attacked their teachers!
When Han Chinese mention Japanese, the most used title is “the dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters”.
And Han Chinese want to prove that Japanese ancestors are Han Chinese. (According to Han Chinese way of thinking, ancestors are superior to descendants, and ancestors are in higher rank, and the lower ranked descendants who scattered in the world should be ruled by the descendants who live in the area where their ancestors lived. And mainland Han Chinese, especially the Han Chinese from Henan(河南), Shanxi(陕西), Shanxi(山西) or around, should rule all of the Han Chinese in the world.)
Then, the chief reason for Han Chinese to hate Japanese is that Japanese had ever hurt Han Chinese arrogance! While not anything else.
And Han Chinese hadn’t been completely conquered or ruled by Japanese. Han Chinese have no history to be called “our dynasty” ruled by Japanese. Had Han Chinese been completely conquered and ruled by Japanese, Han Chinese attitudes towards Japanese would be totally different. But it didn’t happen. Otherwise, Han Chinese will call their rulers “dear from-the-same-wombs” to avoid explaining their humiliated history, just like they call Mongols or Manchu. (If ruled by brother, Han Chinese think their honor is still there.)
It is why Japanese cannot be called “our dear from-the-same-wombs” by Han Chinese, but hated most by them.

Why is beijing 2008 olympics most hated by Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”?

beijing 2008 olympics torch had been welcomed with protests. But those who hate the olympics most are Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”(亲爱的同胞 Pinyin: qin ai de tong bao. Translation: fellow citizen; brothers/sisters; countryman).
Why?
What’s wrong with Han Chinese?
What does the title of “dear-from-the-same-wombs” really mean?
How should Han Chinese treat their “dear-from-the-same-wombs”?
I’d rather leave the questions.

Han Chinese Made Me No Longer Hate Japanese

Since my birth, I had been taught how bad Japanese were. And I had read numerical Chinese books about Japanese cruelty.
But my dear-from-the-same-wombs, the Han Chinese, had converted me not to hate Japanese any more, because Han Chinese have been much much worse than Japanese invaders. And there’s another difference. Japanese treated their enemy cruelly, while Han Chinese treat their dear-from-the-same-wombs cruelly, unfairly, arrogantly, rudely, inhumanly, virulently …
That is a huge difference.

The Useful Urine

There’s a story about how Han Chinese treated their class enemies in china.
During the Culture Revolution, when public criticizing and punishment was held, some class-enemies would get criticized, scolded, and punished because of their “class-crimes”. One of the ways to punish them is to have night-soil buckets, which were filled with urine, and to hang the night-soil buckets on each of the class-enemies’ neck with an iron wire, and then to pour boiling water into the night-soil buckets to stir and heat the smelly air out of the urine, to suffocate the class-enemies.

I remember French Revolution. There are many killings in that era. But did French treat their domestic or foreign enemies in that way?

Because Han Chinese ethnic group is smarter than French ethnic group?

Love And Hatred

When I went to beijing, Han Chinese illustrated what love was and what hatred was.

I had to love the Party, had to love china, had to love the ruled (the people), had to love the old, have to love the young, had to love everything they wanted me to love. It was my obligation to give my love.

And when I thought I had my rights and when I practiced my rights, they illustrated me what hatred was. They hated me that much! They treated me that hatefully! That rudely, arrogantly and violently! I saw vicious beasts only because they saw me practicing my rights,

And in the end, I understood what Han Chinese love and Han Chinese hatred was.
Love means I must love them. I must attend to that obligation.
But if I want to have any right or enjoy any right, they let me know what hatred is.

Old Hatred and New Hatred

In June that year after the Hainan Island incident, I visited a military unit in beijing. When I entered the building, I saw a wall in the hall and there’s a propaganda, which read “旧恨添新仇, roughly translated: new hatred was added to the old hatred”.

But I remember that USA had been one of the main trading partners of china at that time.
Trading partner? Enemy?
War? Peace?

I am right, because

Han Chinese reasons or theories for why right why wrong are contradictory. They don’t have any consistent ethical system for anybody at anytime in any case. So, why right? Why wrong?

1

My reasons or my theories are right, yours are wrong. It is because the reasons or theories are MINE, while not YOURS.

2

I think you should be restricted by me. So you are morally wrong when you are in any conflict with me. I can think you are the inferior and I can be arrogant rude offensive. And I just blame you, educate you, and rebuke you. It is why I am right.

3

But everthing changes when we are in the violent conflicts. In that case, I am right because I am the winner in the violent fighting. And I am wrong because I am the loser. The winner in the violence is right.

=============

Probably the above are not Han Chinese philosophy in books. But they are definitely Han Chinese behavior principles in reality.

Dynasty history and Han Chinese history

The Han Chinese history I had learned in the class,

• We don’t know where we are originally from. But we know we all have the same ancestor, Yan Huang. And I don’t have an idea if that person is male or female. And I have never known if he or she has a spouse. But he or she has so many descendants. And our earliest ancestor was living in Hua Xia, the center of the world.
• And we have so many dynasties. To learn history means to learn dynasties, from their birth till their death. And we all learn the lessons from the death of the dynasties to seek how to keep a dynasty alive as long as possible. We also learn the relationship between Han Chinese and other ethnic groups. But its necessity is far less important that a dynasties’ life. Dynasty! Dynasty! Dynasty! Han Chinese history means dynasties. And in the end, we pay more attention to the rise and fall of some dynasty than who ruled us in that dynasty. We are sensitive to the dynasties’ life, but have less sense of the rulers’ identity.

That’s Han Chinese, a rotten group obsessed with over self-respecting. They have been living in the glory of 5000 years of writing history. They got lost in their dynasties and dynasties. And in the end, few of them know their own identity. If you call them Han Chinese and talk about Han Chinese, they would feel it objectionable and answer you that why you are so abnormal that you even talk about the so called Han Chinese. “Han Chinese” is so called. They totally forget themselves are Han Chinese.

When you learn the dynasty history, do you still really remember that’s Han Chinese history?

When I think Han Chinese normal human, I hurt myself.

When I think Han Chinese normal human, I hurt myself.

When I think Han Chinese evil, and when I prepare for fighting, I don’t hurt myself that much.

It almost cost my life to have the faith of “if I treat others friendly, I will be treated friendly, if I treat others better, I will be treated better”. Han Chinese taught me lessons, deadly lessons. And when I went to the opposite, I started to know the real Han Chinese. They offend the kind and surrender to the offender.

That’s just my life experience.

Because of age

Han Chinese would rebuke others because “I think you must be older than me!” (You are older. You should be restricted more.) They can also rebuke others because “I think you must be younger than me.” (You are younger. You should be restricted more.)

You are supposed to be either older or younger (without knowing the truth), and it becomes the reason why you are morally wrong.

I suppose myself either older or younger, and it is why I can arrogantly rebuke you the morally wrong.

That’s Han Chinese moral values system. The surface reasons are not the real reasons. The real reasons are hidden in their behaviors. The same conditions can cause either wrong or right, depending on “who”.

So, what is the real Han Chinese reason for becoming right or wrong?

Not the abstract “if conditions, then statements”, but “If it is me, then I must be right and I am the superior and I can arrogantly rebuke you. If it is you, then you must be wrong and you the inferior should be rebuked by me the superior.”

Han Chiense moral criterion is “who-criterion”.

“You are morally inferior!”

When I got attacked unfairly, when I got offended by the arrogant, I complained. But I just got despised by the listener, “You are morally inferior!” (象个小孩！不懂事！Pinyin: xiang ge xiao hai, bu dong shi)

So, who is morally superior?

Han Chinese think the arrogant offender, the unfair attacker, is morally superior, or just superior and has the rights to offend and attack. Unfairness is nothing wrong. But arrogance wins sympathy.

That’s Han Chinese sense of morality.

Double gain and double loss

After Han Chinese did something evil, they beautify themselves (sometimes they redefine the values to make themselves never be wrong) and deface the victim. And they pretend to be morally superior and they are arrogant. Then, they, the morally superior, can arrogantly attack the victims more. They smartly make double gains.

And after the victims have the loss, they just get smeared to be morally inferior. And they get attacked more. They take double losses.

It happens to Han Chinese all the time.

And it is why you can see why Han Chinese have something “beautiful” and also something “evil”. And it is why Han Chinese are so hypocritical and behave evilly. And it forces all of the Han Chinese to engage in a contest, double gains contest (actually double evils), in their daily life. If there’s anybody not engaging in that contest, they just get punished by taking double losses.

Religion and science, Han Chinese and European

When I read the history of Christianity, I find that Europeans have been seeking the facts to prove everything true in the bible. And it becomes the reason why they believe in the God. And more importantly, it becomes one of the sources of science. In both the areas of human and the nature, Europeans have discovered many secrets since the beginning of Christianity when Europeans sought evidence to prove the contents of the bible true.

Simply, Europeans believe because of the facts.

But Han Chinese are totally different. Totally. If Europeans have the faith of facts, Han Chinese have the faith of how-I-think-about-it.

When people doubt if the Gods exist, Han Chinese say, “They exist if you believe in the Gods.” And when people doubt if it is valuable to believe in the Gods, Han Chinese say, “It works if you believe in the Gods.” That means it depends on how you think or whether you believe or not, while not because of the facts or not.

When Han Chinese professors teach theories in universities, they act as if those theories are sacred and you can only believe but can’t doubt and seek evidences to prove the theories true. If you refuse to accept any theory before you find evidences to prove it, you would be thought the inferior and get low scores. If you believe the theories before you have the evidences, you can get higher scores and teachers think you are smart. Han Chinese learn theories more religiously than Europeans read the bible. (Is it amazing?)

That also affects Han Chinese life. (Please view a related post here.)

Few Han Chinese admit that they are inferior. But their inferiority is just the fact and they “naturally” ignore the fact. On the contrary, they “naturally” show others their “superiority” because of the pressure from their relationship.

Tragedy.

Han Chinese love

“Love!”

“You should love others!” “You should donate your love!” It is because love is a good human value. Love can make the world much better. It can prove you are good if you love others. It can show your good personality if you donate your love to others.

But do Han Chinese love others?

No. We Han Chinese think stupid people love others. Foolish people follow the hypocritical words.

What Han Chinese do is to ask you to donate love and tell you how good it is to love others. And Han Chinese are very happy when you donate your love to them. If you failed to donate your love, they will condemn you the bad!

Han Chinese friendship

Han Chinese want you to become their friends, because they want you to treat them as friends.

Han Chinese want you to become their brothers/sisters (dear-from-the-same-wombs), because they want you to treat them as brothers/sisters.

But do themselves treat you as friends or brothers/sisters? No. They just treat you as their enemy because they just want to enjoy the rights of your friends/brothers/sisters and the rights to treat you as enemy. They don’t definitely want to attend to the duties for a friend. And it relieves them when they treat you as their enemy. (Should friendship be a mutual one? Oh my goodness! What’s a question! We Han Chinese only know how to use others. Friendship is just a tool.)

That’s not a theory about Han Chinese. That’s the Han Chinese reality.

Think and real

One of the most featured Han Chinese phenomena is that Han Chinese concern more about how others would think about them. They don’t concern much about what life should really be. So, Han Chinese live the life of how-others-would-think-about-me, while not live the life that it should be.

It is because Han Chinese relationship between the superior and the inferior. And it causes serious Han Chinese problems. For example, in their relationship, Han Chinese “naturally” pursue the life of being the superior. But it isn’t the real superiority, but making-others-think-I-am-superior. And it is why Han Chinese don’t admit any wrongdoing after they made mistakes. It is also why Han Chinese can’t accept the  reality when others are really better than them. And it is why Han Chinese can’t learn from lessons, but telling the world how superior themselves are all the time. And it is why Han Chinese actually become the inferior. They just keep blind to the truth.

If people want to pursue the real superiority, they shouldn’t keep blind to the facts. They should find out their own flaws to correct themselves and make themselves really superior. They shouldn’t pursue to be thought superior by others and then fool others, and also fool themselves. They can never learn only because they worry whether they would be thought inferior if they admit their own flaws.

And the problem is serious enough to make Han Chinese even not be able to learn after they have got conquered twice! And it is why they just have been proving their superiority to their masters with their knees on the ground.

Han Chinese is the ethnicity which has been going backward. It isn’t because of their skin color, but because of their relationship.