Why Are Japanese Most Hated By Han Chinese?

Han Chinese as an ethnic group has been invaded by many. Among the many, Mongols and Manchu have become Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, Russian has become Han Chinese “superior brother”, only western countries and Japan remain on Han Chinese enemy list. And Japanese are the most hated by Han Chinese. Why?
Because of Japanese invasion?
Obviously it isn’t a true reason.
Because of the so called Nanking massacre?
I remember that there are Yangzhou massacre and Jiading massacre by Manchu. But Manchu people have become Han Chinese “dear-from-the-same-wombs”. So, it isn’t a true reason either.

Because of the Japanese cruelty in battle?

I remember that Mongols were also very cruel. But Han Chinese call them “dear-from-the-same-wombs”, too. So, it isn’t a true reason either.
Then, what’s the exact reason for Han Chinese to hate Japanese that much?
There are some clues.
When Japanese invaded china, some Han Chinese cried that Han Chinese had taught Japanese the students, how to write, but today the students attacked their teachers!
When Han Chinese mention Japanese, the most used title is “the dog-fathered inferior Japanese monsters”.
And Han Chinese want to prove that Japanese ancestors are Han Chinese. (According to Han Chinese way of thinking, ancestors are superior to descendants, and ancestors are in higher rank, and the lower ranked descendants who scattered in the world should be ruled by the descendants who live in the area where their ancestors lived. And mainland Han Chinese, especially the Han Chinese from Henan(河南), Shanxi(陕西), Shanxi(山西) or around, should rule all of the Han Chinese in the world.)
Then, the chief reason for Han Chinese to hate Japanese is that Japanese had ever hurt Han Chinese arrogance! While not anything else.
And Han Chinese hadn’t been completely conquered or ruled by Japanese. Han Chinese have no history to be called “our dynasty” ruled by Japanese. Had Han Chinese been completely conquered and ruled by Japanese, Han Chinese attitudes towards Japanese would be totally different. But it didn’t happen. Otherwise, Han Chinese will call their rulers “dear from-the-same-wombs” to avoid explaining their humiliated history, just like they call Mongols or Manchu. (If ruled by brother, Han Chinese think their honor is still there.)
It is why Japanese cannot be called “our dear from-the-same-wombs” by Han Chinese, but hated most by them.

Why Do Han Chinese Look So Serious?

Where: china
When: 21st century

When I walked in the street with some westerners, they asked, “Why do Chinese look so serious?”
A good question.
Most of Han Chinese have to look serious when there meet strangers. If they don’t look serious, they would get punished. Most of Han Chinese think those people inferior if they don’t look serious. And Han Chinese think they have a chance to release their mental pressure to the inferior. And they will treat the inferior rudely arrogantly.
So, it is very important for Han Chinese to show others the coldness and seriousness to get secured. (They want to let others know “I don’t trust you and I am ready to defend myself if you attack me”.)
————
Another question frequently asked by westerners is “Why do Chinese like to wear a suit?”
It can’t be explained by exploring Chinese physical feelings when they are in a suit, but can be partly explained if we notice that Chinese concern how others think them (the superior or the inferior). They want to make others’ attitudes by wearing a suit more than their other concerns.

Fuck your mom and fuck your wife

“Fuck your mom in the pussy!”

I don’t know how many Han Chinese or how many times they say that to others everyday. But I guess more Han Chinese say that more frequently than the Han Chinese who say “thank you” or “sorry”.
But, why do they (men or women) say,

“Mom’s!”

“Mom’s pussy!”
“Your mom’s pussy!”

“Fuck your mom!”
“Fuck your mom in the pussy!”
“I fuck your ancestor!”
“I fuck eighteen generations of your ancestor!”
And some women would say, “Fuck your dad!”
But they don’t say,
“Fuck your wife.” or “Fuck your daughter.” or “Fuck your son.” They don’t even say “Fuck you!”

Why?
What’s the difference?
Obviously, it is because of the generation difference.
Why can the generation difference be used to offend?
It is because of Han Chinese ranking difference between different generations and because the rights/obligations are different between different ranks.
So, it is definitely different between “fuck your mom” and “fuck your wife” or “fuck your daughter”. (One can be in the superior generation by fucking others’ mom or dad, and can only be in the same generation by fucking others’ wife, and can only be in the inferior generation by fucking others’ daughter or son. It cannot offend others for Han Chinese to say “fuck your daughter”. Han Chinese think it can only offend themselves to say “fuck your daughter” (to become others’ son in law to be the inferior). So, no Han Chinese say that. But a lot of Han Chinese say “fuck your mom”.)
——————————-
* Han Chinese say that to humiliatingly offend others.

Main reason for Han Chinese evils

Why are Han Chinese “naturally” arrogant, rude and liking offending the vulnerable, the kind, the considerate, or the friendly? And why are they “naturally” cowardly to fight against the offender?

Why could Han Chinese accept Mongols’ rule or Manchu’s rule, but couldn’t they accept their children leaving home (escape from their control)?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about freedom, others’ freedom or themselves’ freedom?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about fair, normal and proper rights/obligations, or rights/obligations-based fairness? But all of them know what superior/inferior is, and all of them try to find out whether others see them the superior or the inferior. Why?

Why do Han Chinese know nothing about facts, but keep in their minds who is the superior, who is the inferior?

Why are the arrogant Han Chinese comparatively lower qualified, and why do they demand others to be higher qualified? Why do “the superior humans” become sub-beasts?

Why do Han Chinese fight mainly over “who can be the arrogant”, and why is it the main reason for Han Chinese infighting?

Why are Han Chinese so hypocritical?

Why are Han Chinese so inconsistent?

Why do Han Chinese give the reasons, moral values, theories, or knowledge contradictory to their own attitudes/behaviors, or against themselves? And why don’t they think they have any problem, but think themselves the superior or the smarter?

Why do Han Chinese have no fact-based standard, but have the standard of “how I see you” or “how I would be seen” to settle the dispute in the relationships?

Those are main Han Chinese evils. And the main reason for those evils is the evil in the relationships between Han Chinese themselves, or between Han Chinese and others. Han Chinese relationship is between the superior and the inferior. It forces everybody’s psychological state or personality state compulsorily partial, one sided, prejudiced. So, Han Chinese are naturally not able to think or act fairly, or fact-basedly, or adhere to universal moral values.

the “pig/dog” and the “dear from the same womb”

Another interesting and contradictory phenomenon is that Han Chinese call other Han Chinese “dog/pig”, or “non native”, or “wanderer”, but also call other Han Chinese and sometimes non-Han-Chinese “dear from-the-same-wombs”.

Why?

It can also be simply explained.

If Han Chinese want to rule you and if you are willing or possibly you are willing to accept their rule, you are their “dear from-the-same-wombs”.

But if you are already under their rule, or if you are not under their rule and you are unwilling to accept their rule, you are the “pig/dog”.

So, you can know when you will be called “pig/dog” and when you will be called “dear from the same womb” by Han Chinese.

Pig/dog and the superior ethnic group

You would find it very interesting and contradictory that Han Chinese themselves call each other “Pig/dog” and at the same time they force everybody to think Han Chinese ethnic group “the superior ethnic group”.

Why?

That phenomenon can be easily explained.

It is because Han Chinese personality is one-sided and their pursuit of being arrogant.

Then, the partial personality and their pursuit make them look down on each other and offensively call each other “pig/dog” to make themselves be the superior and can be arrogant, and the same reasons make them have to force everybody to think Han Chinese ethnic group “superior”, and then they can be arrogant in the world.

So, Han Chinese make themselves “the superior pig ethnic group”.

How to describe Han Chinese in a simple way

If I want to describe Han Chinese in a simple way, all of the below are true.

• Han Chinese is a group, of which the members are in the relationship between the upper and the lower all the time.
• Han Chinese distinguish between who can be the upper and who should the lower when they get to know each others, while not concern friendliness or fairness.
• Han Chinese can’t really know what fairness is.
• Han Chinese have the unbalanced personality in their unbalanced relationship.
• The unbalance causes most of the Han Chinese traits.
• Han Chinese use moral values as their tool to offend others, and free themselves from obligation.
• The only universal moral value for all of Han Chinese is that “human” should pursue to be arrogant, even if they have to kneel.
• Han Chinese put moral values lower than the upper ranked Han Chinese, and higher than the lower ranked Han Chinese.
• Han Chinese have most of its values opposite to natural human values.
• Han Chinese moral values are for unbalanced relationship, while not for natural human relationship. Their moral values don’t benefit either side in the relationship.
• The higher ranked Han Chinese have the attitudes/behaviors poorer than the lower ranked Han Chinese’s.
• Han Chinese are unbalanced and evil, but they are arrogant and look down on whomever they don’t fear.
• Han Chinese know what “truth” should purposely be, but don’t know what truth is.
• Han Chinese don’t know what facts are. They don’t know how to treat facts either.
• You can never understand Han Chinese with your natural human personality.
• Han Chinese don’t know your rights or my rights, but know who can be the upper and who should be the lower. And that’s the conduct of their behavior. That’s why they treat others and why they accept the treatment by others.

Han Chinese Evolution

When those in the upper rank or the low life in the upper rank become lower life in the upper rank, and limit the lower ranked ones to become higher-qualified, that makes people both in the higher rank or in the lower rank become lower further.

Many say that there’s no development in Han Chinese history. Roughly, it is true. Han Chinese even became morally worse in their history.

If we realize that Han Chinese means Han Chinese relationship, it is not hard for us to understand their history (from Qin Empire till today’s communism Empire).

Every Han Chinese is in Han Chinese relationship, which is between the upper and the lower. And every Han Chinese has to be restricted by Han Chinese relationship moral codes, which serves the upper and offends the lower. And the upper doesn’t think they should adhere to the same moral values, because they want to be different and to be the higher. Then, when they treat the lower, their attitudes or behaviors are like beasts’. They even act more savage than beasts. So, Han Chinese must be in the relationship between the higher and the lower. And the upper has more savage attitudes/behaviors and the lower can’t be thought better than the upper. It causes the quality of the entire group goes down. When the declining quality threatens most or all of Han Chinese lives, the relationship can’t be stable, and it collapses. After a period of turmoil, new relationship between the upper and the lower got established. And another cycle begins. That’s Han Chinese dynasty cycle.

Such Han Chinese characteristics happens to Han Chinese personal relationship, also happens to the relationship between Han Chinese ruler and the people.

Today, mainland China is still heavily influenced by Han Chinese tradition and communism. It is little influenced by western civilization. And it goes more like a traditional Han Chinese Dynasty. Other Han Chinese countries or areas are influenced by western civilization more, and when Han Chinese struggling between the western values and the traditional Han Chinese relationship, the state can be better than that in mainland China, but no match for western world.

.

From the upper to the lower

Because of Han Chinese unbalanced right/obligation in their unbalanced relationship, everybody wants to be the upper. But their history shows that it makes them become the lower in geopolitics, morality, or in quality.

The Han Chinese “upper” is not the fact of “upper”, but they make others think them the upper, don’t make others think them the lower. Because of Han Chinese right/obligation in their upper/lower relationship, they make others think them the upper by offending, humiliating others, violating others’ rights, assigning others responsibilities, robbing more opportunities. That makes them morally low. And it makes them politically weak. It is one of the reasons why they got conquered and ruled by their vastly outnumbered rivals. And since they think the learners the lower, the arrogant ignorant ones the upper, it lowers the entire group’s quality.

Fight for arrogance and fight against arrogance

Han Chinese are famous for their infighting. But why do they fight and what do they fight for?

Han Chinese fight against each other for arrogance and against others’ arrogance.

No Han Chinese are equal in their relationship. Han Chinese create any relationship based on inequality. Then, it means actually the relationship is between the offender and the victim. And Han Chinese make moral codes to solve the relationship problems between the upper and the lower. But naturally nobody wants to be the lower, the victim. Every Han Chinese wants to be the upper, the offender. When the relationship is already formed, they live in the unbalanced order to wait for their turn to be the upper. But if the relationship is not formed, all of them want to try their arrogance over others. It causes fighting. Everybody wants to lower others and make themselves the upper. It is what Han Chinese fight for and fight against. It is also why they fight against each others.

Strategy and values

Everybody can have their own values. But among those different values, who have the better values?

When people say that value is their belief. It is just a belief, no need to offer reasons. Can people say, “It is my right and it is my choice. I enjoy my life when I have the values.” It sounds great. Most of people like freedom and want to enjoy freedom. But can we really choose our values freely?

What’s a pity. We are born to live under conditions. We can’t be unconditionally alive. And when we contest with each others, the one, who can have better values, wins. If we have no absolute reference of value, we can only find the better values by testing it. And the best test is international wars. (Today, people look for reasons to prove ancient Greek democracy is superior. But if Persians had won over Greeks, people would prove another way of life superior. Han Chinese is the only one, who can win by keeping blind to fact. Han Chinese don’t win in reality, they win in how-I-think-it. So I have to set it the standard of value if a country would win or lose in international wars in a long time. The superiority in international wars means better values.)

———————-

How to evaluate?

The answer is related to what we want to get, because only when we want to have something happening to our life, it is valuable for us to evaluate.

It means the evaluation is related to the conditions of the goals we pursue.

Whatever human thinks themselves are, human can’t set their goals freely. Nobody can’t think they are the master of the world when they get down on their knees to their invaders if at the same time they think they are mentally normal. So, I suppose it the highest and realistic goal to live without surrendering to the rivals. Sometimes, we call it strategy. Although such goal can’t satisfy anyone, but it is already the toughest one for us to pursue.

Without rival and competition, human always goes stupid. No any danger in human life is tougher than the rival. So, we can suppose we have the smartest rival, and we can define it right if it is helpful to defeat the rival, and define it wrong if it is in our rival’s behalf to defeat ourselves.

If we think we are different from anything else alive, it is vitally important for us to know the exact affection by the factors.

We should know anything helpful or harmful. And it is also vitally important for us to know the ranking of the values, because it is impossible for us to pay full attention to anything in our life. We should distinguish between urgent and not urgent, between important and more or less important, between affecting factors and non-affecting factors. And we should know the exact affection by the factors and the conditions for them to take effect.

How to compete with our rivals?

Another question should be answered first. Why and how can any rival get defeated? It is because nothing can be alive absolutely freely. Anything alive is conditional. When the conditions get destroyed, nothing can be alive. And the competition is to destroy each others’ conditions of being alive. Those ,who can know and control the conditions of being alive more, can be predominant. But why do some of the people or animals surrender, while others don’t? Animals are not controlled by their own ideas, but controlled by their natural traits. Human is different. When some people surrender, while others don’t do in the same conditions, it means those people think freedom or superiority less important than life. So, if we don’t want to surrender or die, we should not give our rivals any chance to destroy the conditions of being alive, and at the same time, we should have the superior power to destroy the conditions for our rivals to be alive.

The solvable problems and the unsolvable problems

It means something is against our wish if there are problems. But what kind of wishes are possible to get fulfilled and what kind of wishes are impossible to get fulfilled?

Some wishes are easy to get categorized. But some wishes are not easy to get categorized. There’s no obvious boundary between the solvable problems and the unsolvable problems. Sometimes we can call it ambitious if we want to solve the problems, which seem unsolvable. But sometimes it is obviously foolish to solve the problems we think them solvable.

Only those solvable problems can become our work to find the solution.

Han Chinese phenomena or facts

Han Chinese is a group. Can I collect a group’s phenomena like collecting a person’s facts?

If the phenomena happened to Han Chinese at different time, can I put the facts together to find out the principles hidden in the facts?

And like a person changing all the time, Han Chinese group is changing too. How can I find any Han Chinese behavior principle?

If the personal traits don’t lead to conflict, the personal traits can be the group’s traits.

And the traits can be inherited (It is also called tradition) and can influence the descendants, so, I can put the facts happened in different era together to find principles in those “stable Han Chinese traits”.

Generally, we can research Han Chinese by acknowledging today’s Han Chinese, and how Han Chinese evaluate their history or others’ history.

Human facts or phenomena

Human behaviors are different from mechanical motions. Human behaviors are consciously or unconsciously controlled or affected by aims, i.e. we can look for the values of human behavior to alive-system. But it is improper to look for the value of tide to the water. So we can’t think human behaviors are governed by Newton motion laws. But we should seek the value of behavior to human life.

So, when we collect facts or phenomena of human, we should know we are collecting alive-system actions.

How to describe a phenomenon?

We can describe a human phenomenon like describing a rock, or oil. But we should also describe a human phenomenon by describing the value of the behavior, object’s goal if it is a conscious phenomenon, feelings, what the object knows or experiences, decision making process and the reasons, ideas, thoughts, knowledge, attitudes, conflicts in environment or conflicts in mind, need, desire, the way to satisfy a desire, habit, history of experience, history of desire and the history of how desires got satisfied, what history the object remembers and what history the object forgets, what does the object desire most, what is the most unhappy thing in the object’s life, what strongly controls the object’s behaviors or actions, what controls the object, while not the object control him/herself, …, any factor affecting a person different from anything else. By comparing with anything else and seeking the reasons for the difference, we can gradually make the image of a person clear. And the right description can be done.

How to understand a phenomenon?

When the right description of a person is done, the phenomena are also well understood.

How can we know the description is the truth?

Here I have to give a presumption. I suppose all humans have the same original state with the same principles. Then, all of us are just conditionally different. If we can are under the same conditions, we are in the same state and we are the same, we have the same feelings, same desires, we act the same way … Then, if I can change my state to be the same as that of others, I can say I know others, or else, I don’t know others. This presumption is critically important. Without it, we can’t know each other exactly. For example, without that presumption, if somebody shows others something red, probably John actually sees something blue with the name of red, and Mary sees something yellow with the name of red. We just can’t prove it. Then, if we think the presumption true, it is critically important that we should get rid of our self to adjust our self to be the same as the object’s to have the possible knowledge of the object. When we naturally act the way same as the way our object acts, we probably know the object exactly. If we can know others, we can only know ourselves, and only when we can suppose we are the same as others, we can know others by knowing ourselves. But it is conditional. Or else, we would get the false information about the object.

General analysis process

Suppose there’s no contradiction in nature.

Apparently, the quality of hypothesis depends on the quality of the fact set. If there are more independent facts or phenomena of the object in the set, the hypothesis, which should be consistent with the set, is closer to truth.

(The freedom of hypothesis gets restricted by facts. What we want is the hypothesis with less freedom.)