The only Han Chinese consistency

If you put what Han Chinese said and what they did together, you would find that there’s no consistency.

If you put what Han Chinese said or did at different times together, you would not find any consistency.

If you think Han Chinese have the conduct of “if conditions, then what human should do”, you would fail to find any consistency of their conduct.

It seems Han Chinese have no any predictable attitude/behavior/response/reason. But it isn’t true. There’s Han Chinese consistency, and that’s the only one.

The only Han Chinese consistency:

“If you and me are in a family relationship, usually I should adhere to the family behavior rules.”

“If you are not in the family relationship with me, and if I can make the maximum instant benefit for myself, or if I can avoid larger instant loss, whatever my attitude/behavior/response/reason is right. ” It is absolutely one sided and temporary.

Then, we can find the Han Chinese consistency or Han-Chineseism to understand what they say and what they do when they are in conflict with others (their dear from-the-same-wombs, or other ethnic minorities, or foreigners).

Why do Han Chinese offend Japanese in peace time? Because they want to be the upper group.

Why did Han Chinese comfort Japanese troops? Because they wanted to live longer.

Why is it wrong at this time, while it was right before? Because Han Chinese can benefit themselves more by stating it wrong at this time.

Why don’t Han Chinese have the same moral values as those they ask others to have? Because they can benefit themselves more by doing that.

Why is what Han Chinese do different from the image they use to impress others? Because they think they can benefit themselves more by doing that.

No consistency?

Absolutely consistent!